Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core vs Apple M1 Max

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core

► remove from comparison Apple M2 Pro 10-Core

The Apple M2 Pro 10-Core is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the early 2023 MacBook Pro 14 and Mac Mini entry level models. It offers 10 of the 12 cores available in the chip divided in six performance cores (P-cores) and four power-efficiency cores (E-cores). The E-cores clock with up to 3.4 GHz, the P-Cores up to 3.7 GHz (mostly 3.3 GHz in multi-threaded workloads and 3.4 GHz in single threaded).

The big cores (codename Avalanche) offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 36 MB shared L2 cache (up from 24 MB in the M1 Pro). The four efficiency cores (codename Blizzard) are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. CPU and GPU can both use the 24 MB SLC (System Level Cache). 

The unified memory (16 or 32 GB LPDDR5-6400) next to the chip is connected by a 256 Bit memory controller (200 GB/s bandwidth) and can be used by the GPU and CPU.

The performance of the M2 Pro 10-Core should be similar to the old M1 Pro with all 10 cores. The multi-threaded performance should be slower, as the M2 10-core has two p-cores less (and 2 e-cores more) but the single-threaded performance should be better due to the faster clock speed and architectural improvements. The old M1 Pro 8-core should be noticeably slower.

The integrated graphics card in the M1 Pro 10-core offers all 16 of the 19 cores.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine (faster than M1 Pro), a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), a unified memory architecture, Thunderbolt 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders (including ProRes).

The M2 Pro is manufactured in 5 nm at TSMC (second generation) and integrates 40 billion transistors. 

Apple M1 Max

► remove from comparison Apple M1 Max

The Apple M1 Max is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the late 2021 MacBook Pro 14 and 16-inch models. It offers all 10 cores available in the chip divided in eight performance cores (P-cores with 600 - 3220 MHz) and two power-efficiency cores (E-cores with 600 - 2064 MHz). There is no Turbo Boost for single cores or short burst periods. The cores are similar to the cores in the Apple M1.

The big cores (codename Firestorm) offer 192 KB instruction cache, 128 KB data cache, and 24 MB shared L2 cache (up from 12 MB in the M1). The four efficiency cores (codename Icestorm) are a lot smaller and offer only 128 KB instruction cache, 64 KB data cache, and 4 MB shared cache. CPU and GPU can both use the 48 MB SLC (System Level Cache). The efficiency cores (E cluster) clock with 600 - 2064 MHz, the performance cores (P cluster) with 600 - 3228 MHz.

The unified memory (32 or 64 GB LPDDR5-6400) next to the chip is connected by a 512 bit memory controller (200 GB/s bandwidth) and can be used by the GPU and CPU. This is the main difference to the M1 Pro and the CPU performance is quite similar.

The biggest difference to the M1 Pro is the bigger integrated GPU with 24 or 32 cores (up from 16).

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a fast 16 core neural engine, a secure enclave (e.g., for encryption), a unified memory architecture, Thunderbolt 4 controller, an ISP, and media de- and encoders (including two ProRes engines).

The M1 Pro is manufactured in 5 nm at TSMC and integrates 57 billion transistors. The peak power consumption of the chip was advertised around 30W for CPU intensive tasks. 

ModelApple M2 Pro 10-CoreApple M1 Max
SeriesApple Apple M2Apple Apple M-Series
Series: Apple M-Series
Apple M2 Max compare2.42 - 3.7 GHz12 / 12 cores48 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro compare2.42 - 3.5 GHz12 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core « 2.42 - 3.7 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M2 compare2.42 - 3.48 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Apple M1 Max « 2.06 - 3.22 GHz10 / 10 cores48 MB L3
Apple M1 Pro compare2.06 - 3.22 GHz10 / 10 cores24 MB L3
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core compare2.06 - 3.22 GHz8 / 8 cores16 MB L3
Apple M1 compare2.06 - 3.22 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2424 - 3696 MHz2060 - 3220 MHz
L1 Cache7.3 MB2.9 MB
L2 Cache36 MB28 MB
L3 Cache24 MB48 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 1010 / 10
Transistors40000 Million57000 Million
Technology5 nm5 nm
FeaturesARMv8 Instruction SetARMv8 Instruction Set
iGPUApple M2 Pro 16-Core GPUApple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced

Benchmarks

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11811 Points (11%)
min: 12385     avg: 12389     median: 12386 (12%)     max: 12396 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1643 Points (70%)
min: 1530     avg: 1533     median: 1533 (65%)     max: 1536 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
449 Points (50%)
min: 390     avg: 393.3     median: 395 (44%)     max: 395 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3235 Points (8%)
min: 2735     avg: 2746     median: 2750 (7%)     max: 2753 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1664 Points (11%)
min: 1689     avg: 1691     median: 1691 (11%)     max: 1693 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
231 Points (70%)
min: 197     avg: 202.3     median: 200 (60%)     max: 210 Points
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
435 Seconds (6%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
415 Seconds (3%)
min: 187     avg: 188.7     median: 189 (1%)     max: 190 Seconds
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1926     avg: 1937     median: 1936.5 (82%)     max: 1947 Points
min: 1764     avg: 1780     median: 1782 (75%)     max: 1795 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12074     avg: 12132     median: 12131.5 (22%)     max: 12189 Points
min: 12563     avg: 12656     median: 12697 (23%)     max: 12708 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
447.4 ms (1%)
min: 404.3     avg: 459.2     median: 482.3 (1%)     max: 491.1 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
75471 Points (68%)
min: 66938     avg: 68647     median: 68029 (61%)     max: 70973 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
250 Points (72%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
391 Points (81%)
min: 350     avg: 358.7     median: 360 (75%)     max: 366 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1772 Points (68%)
min: 1586     avg: 1607     median: 1615 (62%)     max: 1621 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M1 Max +
50.8 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 M1 Max +
53 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
2.2 Watt (1%)
94%
1 M1 Max +
11.6 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.2 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 M1 Max +
31.9 Points per Watt (24%)

Average Benchmarks Apple M2 Pro 10-Core → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Apple M1 Max → 95% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 24. 17:27:30

#0 checking url part for id 14977 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13843 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:40:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.017s ... 0.018s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.018s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14977 +0.003s ... 0.021s

#7 got single benchmarks 14977 +0.009s ... 0.03s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13843 +0.003s ... 0.033s

#9 got single benchmarks 13843 +0.011s ... 0.043s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.078s ... 0.122s

#12 return log +0.021s ... 0.143s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)