Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5750

Intel Core 2 Duo L7300

► remove from comparison

Intel Core 2 Duo T7250

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring only 2 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7200 offers a larger level 2 cache (4MB) and a lower clocked FSB and therefore is a bit faster on the average. However, due to the smaller cache and the lower core voltage, the T7250 should be a bit more power efficient.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5750

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow. Compared to the minimal faster T5800, the T5750 features only a 667 MHz clocked FSB.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo L7300Intel Core 2 Duo T7250Intel Core 2 Duo T5750
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1400 MHz2000 MHz2000 MHz
FSB800800667
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt35 Watt34 Watt
65 nm65 nm, 1.075V-1.175V65 nm, 1.075V-1.175V
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C85 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitIntel 64, Enhanced Steepstep, Execute Disable Bit
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7250Intel Core 2 Duo T5750

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 T5750 +
1.1 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T7250 +
min: 1999     avg: 2062     median: 2072.5 (17%)     max: 2093 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T7250 +
min: 3729     avg: 3771     median: 3762.5 (4%)     max: 3822 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T7250 +
45 s (9%)
101%
1 T5750 +
41.3 s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T7250 +
min: 1608     avg: 1678     median: 1705 (4%)     max: 1751 Points
102%
1 T5750 +
min: 1714     avg: 1732     median: 1738 (4%)     max: 1745 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T7250 +
min: 27     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (6%)     max: 32 s
100%
1 T5750 +
28 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T7250 +
min: 65     avg: 69.5     median: 69.5 (3%)     max: 74 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T7250 +
min: 1432     avg: 1544     median: 1544 (7%)     max: 1656 s
100%
1 T5750 +
1523 s (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T7250 +
min: 18085     avg: 18213     median: 18213 (9%)     max: 18341 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T7250 +
min: 11961     avg: 12395     median: 12395 (10%)     max: 12829 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T7250 +
min: 3715     avg: 4317     median: 4366 (27%)     max: 4794 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T7250 +
4.9 Points (70%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T5750 +
min: 3375     avg: 3413     median: 3412.5 (3%)     max: 3450 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.19
log 28. 21:52:56

#0 checking url part for id 344 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 340 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 407 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:15:05 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#25 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#26 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#27 getting avg benchmarks for device 344 +0s ... 0.007s

#28 got single benchmarks 344 +0s ... 0.007s

#29 getting avg benchmarks for device 340 +0s ... 0.007s

#30 got single benchmarks 340 +0.024s ... 0.031s

#31 getting avg benchmarks for device 407 +0s ... 0.032s

#32 got single benchmarks 407 +0.014s ... 0.046s

#33 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.046s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.047s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.048s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.05s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.051s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.053s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.054s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#51 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.054s

#52 return log +0s ... 0.054s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)