Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7800

Intel Core 2 Duo L7100

► remove from comparison

Intel Core 2 Duo T7700

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 was the fastest Merom based Core 2 Duo with 35 Watt TDP (the Core 2 Extreme was faster, but featured a higher TDP). The Penryn based successor (e.g. Core 2 Duo T8300) is a bit faster at the same clock speed.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7800

► remove from comparison Intel T7800

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 is compareable to the Core 2 Extreme X7800 but featuring a lower TDP and a fixed multiplicator. It is a middle class dual core cpu in 2009 (at the time of announcement it was one of the fastest). Later the Penryn based Core 2 Duo CPUs succeeded the T7800.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo L7100Intel Core 2 Duo T7700Intel Core 2 Duo T7800
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1200 MHz2400 MHz2600 MHz
FSB800800800
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt34 Watt35 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm65 nm
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478 PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
$307 U.S.$515 U.S.
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7700Intel Core 2 Duo T7800

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1290 Points (11%)
min: 2505     avg: 2553     median: 2553.5 (21%)     max: 2598 Points
2663 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2294 Points (3%)
min: 4573     avg: 4620     median: 4620 (5%)     max: 4665 Points
5014 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
995 Points (2%)
min: 1946     avg: 2040     median: 2058 (4%)     max: 2108 Points
2258 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
41 s (9%)
min: 20     avg: 20.8     median: 21 (5%)     max: 21.74 s
19 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
90 s (4%)
min: 49.55     avg: 52     median: 52.2 (2%)     max: 54 s
47 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
2181 s (10%)
1266 s (6%)
1203 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
10503 MIPS (5%)
22156 MIPS (11%)
23563 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
7645 MFLOPS (6%)
15341 MFLOPS (12%)
16641 MFLOPS (13%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
3871 Points (24%)
min: 4014     avg: 5302     median: 5400.5 (34%)     max: 6458 Points
6634 Points (42%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T7700 +
5.3 Points (76%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T7800 +
4393 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 → 163% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 → 175% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.19
log 28. 09:39:52

#0 checking url part for id 386 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 323 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 339 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:15:05 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.007s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.009s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.009s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.009s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.009s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.009s

#25 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#26 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#27 getting avg benchmarks for device 386 +0s ... 0.009s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.01s

#29 got single benchmarks 386 +0.007s ... 0.017s

#30 getting avg benchmarks for device 323 +0s ... 0.017s

#31 got single benchmarks 323 +0.029s ... 0.047s

#32 getting avg benchmarks for device 339 +0.001s ... 0.047s

#33 got single benchmarks 339 +0.009s ... 0.056s

#34 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.056s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.057s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.059s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.06s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.061s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.062s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.063s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.064s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.065s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.066s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.067s

#63 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.068s

#64 return log +0s ... 0.068s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)