Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7250

Intel Core 2 Duo L7100

► remove from comparison

Intel Core 2 Duo T7200

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring the full 4 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7250 offers a smaller level 2 cache and a higher FSB but should be a bit slower on the average.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7250

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring only 2 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7200 offers a larger level 2 cache (4MB) and a lower clocked FSB and therefore is a bit faster on the average. However, due to the smaller cache and the lower core voltage, the T7250 should be a bit more power efficient.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo L7100Intel Core 2 Duo T7200Intel Core 2 Duo T7250
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1200 MHz2000 MHz2000 MHz
FSB800667800
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt34 Watt35 Watt
65 nm65 nm, 1.0375V-1.300V65 nm, 1.075V-1.175V
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478PBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization VT-x, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitVirtualization, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
$286 U.S.
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7200Intel Core 2 Duo T7250

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 L7100 +
1290 Points (11%)
161%
1 T7250 +
min: 1999     avg: 2062     median: 2072.5 (17%)     max: 2093 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 L7100 +
2294 Points (3%)
164%
1 T7250 +
min: 3729     avg: 3771     median: 3762.5 (4%)     max: 3822 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T7250 +
45 s (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
995 Points (2%)
min: 1674     avg: 1720     median: 1717 (4%)     max: 1757 Points
min: 1608     avg: 1678     median: 1705 (4%)     max: 1751 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 228     avg: 233     median: 235 (90%)     max: 236 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
41 s (9%)
min: 25     avg: 25.8     median: 25.5 (6%)     max: 27 s
min: 27     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (6%)     max: 32 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
90 s (4%)
min: 62     avg: 63.5     median: 62.5 (3%)     max: 66 s
min: 65     avg: 69.5     median: 69.5 (3%)     max: 74 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
2181 s (10%)
min: 1585     avg: 1591     median: 1591 (7%)     max: 1597 s
min: 1432     avg: 1544     median: 1544 (7%)     max: 1656 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
10503 MIPS (5%)
min: 12234     avg: 18153     median: 18153 (9%)     max: 24072 MIPS
min: 18085     avg: 18213     median: 18213 (9%)     max: 18341 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
7645 MFLOPS (6%)
min: 8806     avg: 11683     median: 11683 (9%)     max: 14560 MFLOPS
min: 11961     avg: 12395     median: 12395 (10%)     max: 12829 MFLOPS
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 591     avg: 598     median: 592 (41%)     max: 610 Points
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
100%
1 T7200 +
2091 Points (86%)
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
100%
1 T7200 +
2018 Points (91%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 5372     avg: 6325     median: 6472 (87%)     max: 6903 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
3871 Points (24%)
min: 3715     avg: 4317     median: 4366 (27%)     max: 4794 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T7250 +
4.9 Points (70%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 → 130% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 → 132% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.19
log 30. 14:16:10

#0 checking url part for id 386 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 168 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 340 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 29 Nov 2022 12:15:11 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#25 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#26 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#27 getting avg benchmarks for device 386 +0s ... 0.007s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.008s

#29 got single benchmarks 386 +0.007s ... 0.014s

#30 getting avg benchmarks for device 168 +0s ... 0.015s

#31 got single benchmarks 168 +0.047s ... 0.062s

#32 getting avg benchmarks for device 340 +0s ... 0.062s

#33 got single benchmarks 340 +0.023s ... 0.085s

#34 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.085s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.086s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.087s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.089s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.09s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.09s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.09s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.091s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.091s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.091s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.091s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.091s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.091s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.092s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.092s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.092s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.092s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.092s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.092s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.094s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.094s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.095s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.095s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.096s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.096s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.097s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.097s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.097s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.098s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.098s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.099s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.099s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.1s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.1s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.1s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.101s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.102s

#82 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.102s

#83 return log +0s ... 0.102s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)