Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5550

Intel Core 2 Duo L7100

► remove from comparison

Intel Core 2 Duo T5550

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 is an entry-level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Merom-2M core and therefore manufactured in 65nm. It does not support Virtualization functions VT-x of the Merom core and offers only a low clock speed and 2MB level 2 cache.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo L7100Intel Core 2 Duo T5550
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1200 MHz1830 MHz
FSB800667
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt34 Watt
65 nm65 nm, 1.075V-1.250V
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Transistors291 Million
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketPPGA478
FeaturesIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T5550

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1290 Points (12%)
1826 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2294 Points (3%)
3397 Points (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
995 Points (2%)
1484 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 L7100 +
41 s (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 L7100 +
90 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 L7100 +
2181 s (10%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 L7100 +
10503 MIPS (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 L7100 +
7645 MFLOPS (6%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
3871 Points (24%)
3891 Points (24%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T5550 +
4.8 Points (69%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 → 135% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 29. 10:33:37

#0 checking url part for id 386 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 390 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 25 Sep 2022 13:14:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#37 composed specs +0s ... 0.005s

#38 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 386 +0s ... 0.006s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#41 got single benchmarks 386 +0.007s ... 0.013s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 390 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#44 got single benchmarks 390 +0.012s ... 0.025s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.027s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.031s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.032s

#58 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.032s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.028s ... 0.06s

#60 return log +0.004s ... 0.064s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)