HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs HiSilicon Kirin 659

HiSilicon Kirin 935

► remove

The HiSilicon Kirin 935 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC (system-on-a-chip) for smartphones and tablets. It was launched in the first half of 2015. It integrates two quad-core clusters of Cortex-A53 cores (big.LITTLE). The performance cluster clocks at up to 2.2 GHz, the power saving cluster at up to 1.5 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a ARM Mali-T628 MP4 graphics card and LTE Cat. 6 modem. The SoC is manufactured in 28nm and thanks to the small Cortex-A53 cores also suited for smaller smartphones.

HiSilicon Kirin 659

► remove Kirin 659

The HiSilicon Kirin 659 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC for mid-range smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2017 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores. Four cores can be clocked with up to 1.7 GHz (power saving cores) and four with up to 2.36 GHz (performance cores). The difference to the older Kirin 650 and Kirin 655 SoCs is the higher clock speed of the performance cores (2.35 versus 2.1 and 2.0 GHz). The slightly older Kirin 658 is very similar. The 659 is in our benchmarks around 4% faster than the 658 and offers a better LTE radio (Cat. 13).

Furthermore, a ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card (at >=900 MHz), a 64-Bit LPDDR3 memory controller and a dual-sim capable LTE Cat. 6 (max. 300 MBit/s and GSM, WCDMA, UMTS, HSPA+) radio are integrated in the SoC. The processor performance can be compared with the older Kirin 930 and therefore sufficient for daily usage as browsing and non demanding apps. High-end SoCs with Cortex-A57 or A72 cores however should be noticeably faster. The SoC is produced in a modern 16nm FinFET process and is therefore very power efficient.

HiSilicon Kirin 935HiSilicon Kirin 659
Cortex-A53Cortex-A53
: Cortex-A53
» HiSilicon Kirin 9352200 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 6592360 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 658 (compare)2350 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 655 (compare)2100 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 650 (compare)2000 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 930 (compare)2000 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 620 (compare)1200 MHz8 / 8
Marvell Armada PXA1908 (compare)1200 MHz4 / 4
HiSilicon Kirin 9352200 MHz8 / 8
» HiSilicon Kirin 6592360 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 658 (compare)2350 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 655 (compare)2100 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 650 (compare)2000 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 930 (compare)2000 MHz8 / 8
HiSilicon Kirin 620 (compare)1200 MHz8 / 8
Marvell Armada PXA1908 (compare)1200 MHz4 / 4
2200 MHz2360 MHz
8 / 88 / 8
28 16
ARM Mali-T628 MP4 GPU, 4x Cortex-A53e (2.2 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.5 GHz, big.LITTLE), LTE Cat. 6, 2x 32 Bit LPDDR3-1600 Memory ControllerARMv8-ISA, Mali-T830 MP2, Dual SIM LTE (Cat. 6), LPDDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-T628 MP4 ( - 600 MHz)ARM Mali-T830 MP2

3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 9176     avg: 9766.5     median: 9766 (6%)     max: 10357 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
min: 9379     avg: 9822.5     median: 9822 (12%)     max: 10266 Points
12599 Points (15%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
min: 10360     avg: 11015.5     median: 11015 (13%)     max: 11671 Points
min: 11780     avg: 13617.5     median: 13379 (15%)     max: 14930 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics 2560x1440
min: 1632     avg: 1675.3     median: 1685 (21%)     max: 1717 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics 2560x1440
min: 1354     avg: 1624.8     median: 1685 (36%)     max: 1741 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
968 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
2829 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
5944 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
3298 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
3897 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 3888     avg: 3929     median: 3929 (10%)     max: 3970 Points
3508 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 941     avg: 949     median: 949 (19%)     max: 957 Points
876 Points (18%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 3438     avg: 3473     median: 3473 (12%)     max: 3508 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 887     avg: 888     median: 888 (15%)     max: 889 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
800 Points (13%)
min: 869     avg: 919     median: 926 (15%)     max: 946 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
2912 Points (5%)
min: 3316     avg: 3607.6     median: 3680 (6%)     max: 3805 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Multi Thread
min: 270     avg: 276.3     median: 276 (9%)     max: 282 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Single Thread
min: 127     avg: 128.4     median: 128 (13%)     max: 129 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
min: 11028     avg: 13952.3     median: 13952 (23%)     max: 16876 ms
min: 8684     avg: 9440     median: 9271 (16%)     max: 10788 ms
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
min: 942     avg: 991.9     median: 991 (11%)     max: 1041 ms
1172.8 ms (13%)
Octane V2 - Total Score
min: 4106     avg: 4376     median: 4376 (8%)     max: 4646 Points
min: 4191     avg: 4946.9     median: 4980 (10%)     max: 5471 Points
AnTuTu v5 - Total Score
min: 47515     avg: 47623.5     median: 47623 (48%)     max: 47732 Points
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
min: 62810     avg: 65730.4     median: 66608 (23%)     max: 68232 Points
AndEBench - Java
1694 Iter./s (52%)
AndEBench - Native
20418 Iter./s (67%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - CPU Tests
min: 122441     avg: 127602     median: 127601 (17%)     max: 132762 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 battery life
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score
3902 Points (33%)
min: 4615     avg: 4805     median: 4834 (40%)     max: 4911 Points
PCMark for Android - Work performance score
min: 4625     avg: 4748.5     median: 4748 (24%)     max: 4872 Points
min: 5704     avg: 5956.4     median: 5887 (30%)     max: 6252 Points
PCMark for Android - Computer Vision score
min: 2413     avg: 2625.5     median: 2635 (21%)     max: 2819 Points
PCMark for Android - Storage score
min: 5970     avg: 7032     median: 6957 (31%)     max: 8244 Points

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 935 → 100%

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 659 → 106%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)