HiSilicon Kirin 910T vs NXP i.MX 6SLL

HiSilicon Kirin 910T

► remove

The HiSilicon Kirin 910T is an ARM based quad core SoC for Android smartphones and tablets. As HiSilicon is fully owned by Huawei, the chip is mostly used in Huawei models like the MediaPad X1, P6 S, MediaPad M1 and Honor 3C 4G). The SoC integrates four Cortex-A9 cores (at 1.8 GHz max.), a ARM Mali-450 MP4 GPU (at 533 MHz), a 32-bit single-channel LPDDR3-1600 memory controller (533 MHz) and a LTE Cat. 4 radio. The similar named HiSilicon Kirin 910 is a 200 MHz slower clocked (CPU) version.

At the time of announcement in mid 2014, the CPU performance of the Kirin910T is in the mid-range of smartphone and tablet SoCs. The power consumption is a bit higher than usual, as the CPU cores are rather high clocked.

NXP i.MX 6SLL

► remove i.MX 6SLL

The NXP i.MX 6SLL or i.MX6SLL (i.MX 6 Series, MCIMX6V7DVN10AB Part Number) is a single core processor for e-readers. It integrates a single ARM Cortex-A9 processor core clocked at up to 1 GHz and a 2D graphics accelerator called Pixel Processor PXP (including E-INK display controller EPDC with support of up to 2332x1650 and 5-bit greyscale). The integrated memory controller supports up to 400 MHz LPDDR2 or LPDDR3 (32-bit interface). Flash memory can be attached using eMMC 5.0 or SD 3.0 (three connections available). Furthermore, the SoC supports 2x USB 2.0 OTH with PHY. The chip is pin-compatible with the i.MX 6SoloLite which features an additional Vivante GC320 graphics card. WiFi, Bluetooth, GPS or other peripherals have to be connected with external chips.

HiSilicon Kirin 910TNXP i.MX 6SLL
Cortex-A9Cortex-A9
: Cortex-A9
» HiSilicon Kirin 910T1800 MHz4 / 4
Rockchip RK3188 compare1800 MHz4 / 4
HiSilicon Kirin 910 compare1600 MHz4 / 4
Renesas MP5232 compare1500 MHz2 / 2
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1200 MHz2 / 2
Marvell PXA986 compare1200 MHz2 / 2
NXP i.MX 6SLL1000 MHz1 / 1
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 compare1000 MHz1 / 1
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1800 MHz4 / 4
Rockchip RK3188 compare1800 MHz4 / 4
HiSilicon Kirin 910 compare1600 MHz4 / 4
Renesas MP5232 compare1500 MHz2 / 2
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1200 MHz2 / 2
Marvell PXA986 compare1200 MHz2 / 2
» NXP i.MX 6SLL1000 MHz1 / 1
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 compare1000 MHz1 / 1
1800 MHz1000 MHz
4 / 41 / 1
28 40
ARMv7, Mali-450 MP4 (533 MHz), LTE (Cat. 4), Single-Channel LPDDR3-1600 (6.4 GB/s)32-Bit DRAM Controller 400 MHz LPDDR2/LPDDR3, E-INK Display Controller, 2D Graphics Acceleration, eMMC 5.0, USB 2.0 OTG
64 KB
256 KB
iGPUNXP PXP
i.MX 6SLL

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
11572 Points (7%)
11572 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
11485 Points (14%)
11485 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
13330 Points (15%)
13330 Points (15%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1796 (3%)
1796 (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
599 (12%)
599 (12%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
254 MFLOPS (9%)
254 MFLOPS (9%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
83.2 MFLOPS (8%)
83.2 MFLOPS (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
16135 ms (27%)
16134.7 ms (27%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1043 ms (11%)
6771 ms (74%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
2775 Points (5%)
2775 Points (5%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
7189 points (17%)
7189 points (17%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
23864 Points (56%)
23864 Points (56%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
584 Iter./s (18%)
584 Iter./s (18%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
13307 Iter./s (44%)
13307 Iter./s (44%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
12178 Points (2%)
12178 Points (2%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 910T → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks NXP i.MX 6SLL → 95% n=15

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)