Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 910 vs WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 vs Broadcom BCM21664T

HiSilicon Kirin 910

► remove from comparison

The HiSilicon Kirin 910 is an ARM based quad core SoC for Android smartphones and tablets. As HiSilicon is fully owned by Huawei, the chip is mostly used in Huawei models like the MediaPad X1, P6 S, MediaPad M1 and Honor 3C 4G). The SoC integrates four Cortex-A9 cores (at 1.6 GHz max.), a ARM Mali-450 MP4 GPU (at 533 MHz), a 32-bit single-channel LPDDR3-1600 memory controller (533 MHz) and a LTE Cat. 4 radio. The similar named HiSilicon Kirin 910T is a 200 MHz higher clocked (CPU) version.

At the time of announcement in mid 2014, the CPU performance is in the mid-range of smartphone and tablet SoCs. The power consumption is a bit higher than usual, as the CPU cores are rather high clocked.

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove from comparison  WM8950

The VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 is an entry-level SoC for smartphones and tablets. It is aimed at Android 4.x and Windows CE devices and includes a single core Cortex-A9 processor at 1 GHz, an ARM Mali 400 (MP2?) graphics card, multi-standard 1080p video decoding, H.264 video encoding, a DDR3, LPDDR2 memory controller and a hardware security engine.

Broadcom BCM21664T

► remove from comparison Broadcom BCM21664T

The Broadcom BCM21664T is an ARM based entry-level SoC for smartphones that integrates two Cortex-A9 CPU cores clocked at up to 1.2 GHz and a HSPA+ modem with support for 21 Mbps HSDPA and 5.8 Mbps HSUPA. Furthermore, a VideoCore-IV GPU and a video decoder (H.264 1080p capable) and encoder (720p) are built into the SoC.

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 910WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950Broadcom BCM21664T
Series Broadcom
CodenameCortex-A9Cortex-A9Cortex-A9
Series: Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910 « 1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Clock1600 MHz1000 MHz1200 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 41 / 12 / 2
Technology28 nm
FeaturesARMv7, Mali-450 MP4 (533 MHz), LTE (Cat. 4), Single-Channel LPDDR3-1600 (6.4 GB/s)HSPA+ modem, H.264 1080p decoder, 720p encoder
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
iGPUARM Mali-400 MP
Manufacturerwww.wondermedia.com.tw

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 9720     avg: 9785     median: 9784.5 (8%)     max: 9849 Points
3801 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 9766     avg: 9884     median: 9883.5 (8%)     max: 10001 Points
3846 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 8327     avg: 9920     median: 9920 (8%)     max: 11513 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1452     avg: 1548     median: 1547.5 (3%)     max: 1643 Points
658 Points (1%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 481     avg: 509     median: 509 (10%)     max: 537 Points
353 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
622 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1753 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
2784 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
1575 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
1938 Points (5%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
202 MFLOPS (7%)
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
75.7 MFLOPS (3%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
62.8 MFLOPS (6%)
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
15.8 MFLOPS (2%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
22419 ms (26%)
16763 ms (20%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1277     avg: 1361     median: 1360.5 (15%)     max: 1444 ms
1316 ms (14%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
1217 ms (12%)
2410 ms (23%)
1348 ms (13%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 1467     avg: 1535     median: 1535 (1%)     max: 1603 Points
2121 Points (2%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
874 Points (23%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
1200 Points (27%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
1973 Points (26%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
5563 points (13%)
2140 points (5%)
3490 points (8%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 WM8950 +
1282 Points (8%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
min: 21467     avg: 21865     median: 21864.5 (51%)     max: 22262 Points
12059 Points (28%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
537 Iter./s (17%)
180 Iter./s (6%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
11881 Iter./s (39%)
4041 Iter./s (13%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
11258 Points (1%)
4230 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
2019 Points (10%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 910 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 50% n=4

Average Benchmarks Broadcom BCM21664T → 56% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 20. 06:39:11

#0 checking url part for id 6344 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 5948 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.158s ... 0.159s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.159s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 6344 +0.003s ... 0.161s

#8 got single benchmarks 6344 +0.008s ... 0.17s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0.003s ... 0.172s

#10 got single benchmarks 3778 +0.007s ... 0.179s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 5948 +0.003s ... 0.182s

#12 got single benchmarks 5948 +0.007s ... 0.189s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.189s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.127s ... 0.317s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.317s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)