HiSilicon Kirin 910 vs Rockchip RK3188

HiSilicon Kirin 910

► remove

The HiSilicon Kirin 910 is an ARM based quad core SoC for Android smartphones and tablets. As HiSilicon is fully owned by Huawei, the chip is mostly used in Huawei models like the MediaPad X1, P6 S, MediaPad M1 and Honor 3C 4G). The SoC integrates four Cortex-A9 cores (at 1.6 GHz max.), a ARM Mali-450 MP4 GPU (at 533 MHz), a 32-bit single-channel LPDDR3-1600 memory controller (533 MHz) and a LTE Cat. 4 radio. The similar named HiSilicon Kirin 910T is a 200 MHz higher clocked (CPU) version.

At the time of announcement in mid 2014, the CPU performance is in the mid-range of smartphone and tablet SoCs. The power consumption is a bit higher than usual, as the CPU cores are rather high clocked.

Rockchip RK3188

► remove

The Rockchip RK3188 is a fast ARM SoC primarily designed for tablets. It integrates four ARM Cortex A9 cores with NEON extension and a clock speed of up to 1.8 GHz, a Mali-400 MP4 graphics card (up to 600 MHz, 24 GFLOPS) and a low-power (LP-)DDR2/DDR3 memory controller. Due to the high clock rates, the performance of the CPU and GPU is superior to other Cortex-A9 quad-cores such as the Nvidia Tegra 3 and Samsung Exynos 4412. These high frequencies are possible due to the 28nm process (TSMC). However, this results in high power consumption and is thus not suited for compact smartphones.

HiSilicon Kirin 910Rockchip RK3188
Cortex-A9Cortex-A9
: Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
» HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL compare1 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 compare1 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
» Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL compare1 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 compare1 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
1600 MHz1800 MHz
4 / 44 / 4
28 28
ARMv7, Mali-450 MP4 (533 MHz), LTE (Cat. 4), Single-Channel LPDDR3-1600 (6.4 GB/s)Mali-400 MP4 (600 MHz), DDR2/DDR3 Memory Controller (max. 2 GByte)
ArchitectureARMARM
iGPUARM Mali-400 MP4 (600 MHz)
RK3188

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 9720     avg: 9785     median: 9784.5 (6%)     max: 9849 Points
min: 5828     avg: 7773     median: 7936 (5%)     max: 8887 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 9766     avg: 9884     median: 9883.5 (10%)     max: 10001 Points
min: 5434     avg: 7724     median: 8025.5 (9%)     max: 8812 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 8327     avg: 9920     median: 9920 (10%)     max: 11513 Points
min: 9142     avg: 9821     median: 9821 (10%)     max: 10500 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
622 Points (5%)
min: 182     avg: 320     median: 272 (2%)     max: 506 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1753 Points (16%)
min: 326     avg: 687     median: 803 (7%)     max: 933 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
2784 Points (5%)
min: 1769     avg: 2044     median: 2035 (4%)     max: 2328 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
1575 Points (3%)
min: 924     avg: 1123     median: 1104 (2%)     max: 1341 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
1938 Points (5%)
min: 1130     avg: 1275     median: 1182 (3%)     max: 1512 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1452     avg: 1548     median: 1547.5 (3%)     max: 1643
min: 1316     avg: 1410     median: 1421 (3%)     max: 1493
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 481     avg: 509     median: 509 (10%)     max: 537
min: 476     avg: 499     median: 504 (10%)     max: 516
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
202 MFLOPS (7%)
min: 130.044     avg: 131     median: 131.1 (4%)     max: 132.08 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
62.8 MFLOPS (6%)
min: 54.937     avg: 57.2     median: 57.2 (6%)     max: 59.372 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
22419 ms (38%)
13698 ms (23%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1277     avg: 1361     median: 1360.6 (15%)     max: 1444.1 ms
min: 849.2     avg: 1179     median: 1239.8 (14%)     max: 1387.7 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
1217 ms (12%)
min: 701.9     avg: 986     median: 1086 (10%)     max: 1169.6 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 1467     avg: 1535     median: 1535 (3%)     max: 1603 Points
min: 3092     avg: 3094     median: 3093.5 (5%)     max: 3095 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
874 Points (23%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
1200 Points (27%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
1973 Points (26%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
5563 points (13%)
5287 points (12%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 RK3188 +
min: 7505     avg: 7723     median: 7807 (51%)     max: 7856 Points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
min: 21467     avg: 21865     median: 21864.5 (51%)     max: 22262 Points
min: 2139     avg: 14154     median: 19571 (46%)     max: 20752 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
537 Iter./s (17%)
min: 179     avg: 329     median: 374 (11%)     max: 434 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
11881 Iter./s (39%)
min: 10329     avg: 11213     median: 11588 (38%)     max: 11722 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
11258 Points (1%)
min: 9258     avg: 10743     median: 10965 (1%)     max: 11782 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
2019 Points (10%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 910 → 100% n=21

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK3188 → 89% n=21

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)