, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

HiSilicon Kirin 820 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810

HiSilicon Kirin 820

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 820

The HiSilicon Kirin 820 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2020 and contains 8 processor cores. One fast ARM Cortex-A76 core with up to 2.36 GHz, three addition A76 cores at up to 2.22 (as the old Kirin 810) and four efficiency Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.88 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a 5G modem and a fast mid-range ARM Mali-G57 MP6 graphics card. For AI acceleration, the Kirin 820 integrates a DaVinci NPU.

The performance of the CPU part in our tests was slightly higher than the old Kirin 810 (thanks to the fast performance core). Huawei advertises 27% performance advantage for the CPU. The NPU and GPU have bigger performance gains with 73% and 38% more power.

The chip should also integrate Bluetooth 5 and WiFi 6.

The SoC is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC and therefore should be very energy efficient.

HiSilicon Kirin 810

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 810

The HiSilicon Kirin 810 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2019 and contains 8 processor cores. Two fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores with up to 2.27 GHz and six small power efficient ARM Cortex-A55 cores with up to 1.88 GHz (bigLITTLE). Furthermore, the SoC integrates a mid range graphics card called ARM Mali-G52 MP6 with 6 clusters. For AI acceleration, the Kirin 810 integrates a Ascend D100 Lite NPU (Da Vinci architecture). The integrates LTE modem supports Cat.12/13 with Dual Sim VoLTE. For photography, the Kirin 810 integrates the Kirin ISP4.0. The memory controller supports LPDDR4X at up to 2133 MHz. Furthermore, WiFi 802.11ac and Bluetooth 5.0 are integrated in the chip.

The SoC is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC and therefore should be very energy efficient.

HiSilicon Kirin 820HiSilicon Kirin 810
HiSilicon HiSilicon
Cortex-A76/-A55Cortex-A76/-A55
Series: Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G compare0 - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 compare0 - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
» HiSilicon Kirin 8201.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 8101.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 980 compare0 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G compare0 - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 compare0 - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 8201.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
» HiSilicon Kirin 8101.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 980 compare0 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A76/-A55
1840 - 2360 MHz1880 - 2270 MHz
8 / 88 / 8
7 7
ARM Mali-G52 MP6 GPU, 1x Cortex-A76 up to 2.36 GHz, 3x A76 nup to 2.2 GHz, 4x A55 up to 1.84 GHz, big.LITTLE, 5G TDD/FDD, Bluetooth 5, WiFi 6, AGPS, Glonass, BaidouARM Mali-G52 MP6 GPU, 2x Cortex-A76 (2.2 GHz) + 6x Cortex-A55 (1.88 GHz, big.LITTLE), LTE Cat-12 1400 Mbps Downlink, Cat-13 200 Mbps Uplink, Bluetooth 5, WiFi a/b/g/n/ac, AGPS, Glonass, Baidou
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP6ARM Mali-G52 MP6
ArchitectureARMARM

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 820
45.5 pt (73%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 810
36.6 pt (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
41610 Points (43%)
min: 18123     avg: 23401     median: 24426 (25%)     max: 27654 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
4642 Points (58%)
min: 3501     avg: 3731     median: 3720 (47%)     max: 3972 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
4637 Points (67%)
min: 3463     avg: 3749     median: 3782 (55%)     max: 4003 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4235 Points (34%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5223 Points (47%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
17014 Points (33%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
7277 Points (15%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
9969 Points (26%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
0 (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
0 (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
0 (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
0 (0%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3113 (39%)
2836 (36%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
9860 (12%)
7891 (10%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
642 (34%)
min: 592     avg: 598     median: 598 (32%)     max: 604
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2434 (14%)
min: 1890     avg: 1920     median: 1919.5 (11%)     max: 1949
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2254 ms (4%)
min: 2471.6     avg: 2950     median: 2646.3 (4%)     max: 3730.9 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
19727 Points (28%)
min: 15947     avg: 16825     median: 16604 (24%)     max: 17925 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
115 Points (37%)
min: 71     avg: 83.7     median: 83 (26%)     max: 97 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
68406 Points (57%)
min: 55189     avg: 62040     median: 58957 (49%)     max: 71973 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
52226 Points (42%)
min: 45079     avg: 53673     median: 47554 (38%)     max: 68387 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
117476 Points (22%)
min: 56693     avg: 68299     median: 64645 (12%)     max: 83558 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
131099 Points (47%)
min: 92494     avg: 97432     median: 94457 (34%)     max: 105346 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
369207 Points (36%)
min: 259370     avg: 291444     median: 295579 (28%)     max: 319383 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
238069 Points (31%)
217082 Points (29%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
8006 Points (42%)
4294 Points (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
22692 Points (61%)
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
9527 Points (62%)
min: 7541     avg: 8133     median: 7695 (50%)     max: 9164 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
13099 Points (66%)
min: 9189     avg: 10361     median: 9824 (49%)     max: 12070 Points

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 820 → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 810 → 60% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 20. 04:06:07

#0 checking url part for id 12581 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12116 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:09:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.046s ... 0.047s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.047s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12581 +0.003s ... 0.05s

#7 got single benchmarks 12581 +0.007s ... 0.057s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12116 +0.003s ... 0.06s

#9 got single benchmarks 12116 +0.008s ... 0.068s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.068s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.071s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.071s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.072s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.072s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.073s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.073s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.073s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.074s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.074s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.074s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.075s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.009s ... 0.083s

#23 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.084s

#24 return log +0.003s ... 0.088s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)