, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs HiSilicon Kirin 960s

HiSilicon Kirin 710A

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 710A

The HiSilicon Kirin 710A is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It is based on the Kirin 710, but manufactured in 14nm FinFET at SMIC (China) versus the TSMC in 12nm. It was announced mid 2020 and contains 8 processor cores (4x Cortex-A73 at up to 2 GHz, 4x Cortex-A53 at up to 1.7 GHz, BigLITTLE), an ARM Mali G51 MP4, a dual-channel LPDDR4 memory controller and a LTE radio (600 Mbps down, 150 Mbps up). Therefore, the CPU part is similar to the Kirin 960 and 970 (both higher clocked), but the graphics card is a lot slower. 

HiSilicon Kirin 960s

► remove from comparison

The HiSilicon Kirin 960S is an ARM based mid-range octa-core SoC for smartphones and tablets, which was introduced with the 2018 10.5-inch Huawei MediaPad M5. Compared to the normal Kirin 960, the 960S offers an additional NPU for AI calculations from the Kirin 970. Looks like to be slower clocked than the older Kirin 960.

Besides 8 CPU cores (4x Cortex-A73, 4x Cortex-A53), the SoC is also equipped with a modern Mali-G71 MP8 graphics adapter, a dual-channel LPDDR4 memory controller as well as an LTE Cat. 12/13 modem. It is one of the fastest ARM SoCs in the end of 2016. The Kirin 960 is manufactured in a modern 16-nm process at TSMC.

HiSilicon Kirin 710AHiSilicon Kirin 960s
HiSilicon
Cortex-A73/-A53Cortex-A73/-A53
Series: Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 970 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960s2.1 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A73/-A53
» HiSilicon Kirin 710A2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 970 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A73/-A53
» HiSilicon Kirin 960s2.1 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710A2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A73/-A53
2000 MHz2100 MHz
8 / 88 / 8
5500
14 16
ARM Mali-G51 MP4 GPU, 4x Cortex-A73 (2.2 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.7 GHz, big.LITTLE), LTE Cat-12 600 Mbps Downlink, Cat-13 150 Mbps Uplink, Bluetooth 4.2, WiFi a/b/g/n 2.4 GHz, AGPS, Glonass, BaidouARM Mali-G71 MP8 GPU, 4x Cortex-A73 (2.4 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.8 GHz, big.LITTLE), 2x 32 Bit LPDDR4 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-G51 MP4ARM Mali-G71 MP8 ( - 900 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 710A
26.6 pt (42%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 12601     avg: 12741     median: 12740.5 (13%)     max: 12880 Points
14698 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2411     avg: 2456     median: 2456 (31%)     max: 2501 Points
2323 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2441     avg: 2476     median: 2476 (36%)     max: 2511 Points
2101 Points (31%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3221 Points (26%)
2165 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
3498 Points (32%)
3780 Points (34%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
10491 Points (21%)
10498 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
4894 Points (10%)
5303 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6201 Points (16%)
6502 Points (17%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5734 (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1756 (36%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1706 (26%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5609 (14%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1422 (18%)
1634 (20%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5211 (8%)
5809 (9%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 297     avg: 298     median: 298 (16%)     max: 299
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1312     avg: 1322     median: 1322 (8%)     max: 1332
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
4411 ms (7%)
5947 ms (10%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
8911 Points (13%)
6802 Points (10%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
55 Points (19%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
147305 Points (50%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
8364 Points (26%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
28103 Points (34%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
33870 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
43350 Points (27%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
113687 Points (20%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
37557 Points (33%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
35829 Points (29%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
26575 Points (5%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
69743 Points (25%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
169704 Points (16%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
3345 Points (18%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
6401 Points (17%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 6287     avg: 7038     median: 7038 (46%)     max: 7789 Points
5114 Points (33%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 7991     avg: 8101     median: 8101 (41%)     max: 8211 Points
5040 Points (25%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 710A → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 960s → 94% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 16. 00:41:20

#0 checking url part for id 12945 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9952 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 12 Jun 2021 13:08:06 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.044s ... 0.044s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.044s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12945 +0.005s ... 0.049s

#7 got single benchmarks 12945 +0.007s ... 0.056s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9952 +0s ... 0.057s

#9 got single benchmarks 9952 +0.005s ... 0.062s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.062s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.075s

#12 return log +0.003s ... 0.078s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)