Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960s

HiSilicon Kirin 710

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 710

The HiSilicon Kirin 710 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2018 and contains 8 processor cores (4x Cortex-A73 at up to 2.2 GHz, 4x Cortex-A53 at up to 1.7 GHz, BigLITTLE), an ARM Mali G51 MP4, a dual-channel LPDDR4 memory controller and a LTE radio (600 Mbps down, 150 Mbps up). Therefore, the CPU part is similar to the Kirin 960 and 970 (both higher clocked), but the graphics card is a lot slower. 

The Kirin 710 is manufactured at TSMC in 12 nm (compared to the 16nm Kirin 960 and 10nm Kirin 970).

The HiSilicon Kirin 710F is the same chip with a different package (FCCSP - Flip Chip Chip Scale Package) and offers the same specifications (see e.g. our review of the Huawei P Smart Z).

Qualcomm Snapdragon 850

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 850

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 Mobile Compute Platform (or SD850) is a ARM based SoC for Windows laptops. It is a higher clocked version (3 versus 2.8 GHz) of the Snapdragon 845 for smartphones and also manufactured in 10 nm LPP FinFET at TSMC. It integrates 4x Kryo 385 cores (Cortex-A75) at up to 2.95 GHz (max) for performance and 4x Kryo 385 (at 1.8 GHz?) for efficiency. Furthermore offers an X20 LTE modem (Cat. 18 1.2 Gbps downlink, Cat 13 150 Mbps uplink), ac-WiFi and a dual-channel 32-Bit 1866 MHz LPDDR4x memory controller.

The performance of the Snapdragon 850 in Windows is in theory similar to a Intel Core i5 of the Y-series (e.g. Core i5-7y54). However, this is only the case for native ARM64 compiled applications and games. 32-bit applications that are not compiled for the ARM architecture only run in an emulation and perform much worse (e.g. see Cinebench R11.5 benchmark). 64-bit Intel/AMD apps are not supported at all.

The chip is very power efficient as its produced at TSMC in the modern 10nm LPP process. Therefore, laptops using the Snapdragon 850 can be passively cooled (no fan) and should not throttle under constant load.

HiSilicon Kirin 960s

► remove from comparison

The HiSilicon Kirin 960S is an ARM based mid-range octa-core SoC for smartphones and tablets, which was introduced with the 2018 10.5-inch Huawei MediaPad M5. Compared to the normal Kirin 960, the 960S offers an additional NPU for AI calculations from the Kirin 970. Looks like to be slower clocked than the older Kirin 960.

Besides 8 CPU cores (4x Cortex-A73, 4x Cortex-A53), the SoC is also equipped with a modern Mali-G71 MP8 graphics adapter, a dual-channel LPDDR4 memory controller as well as an LTE Cat. 12/13 modem. It is one of the fastest ARM SoCs in the end of 2016. The Kirin 960 is manufactured in a modern 16-nm process at TSMC.

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 710Qualcomm Snapdragon 850HiSilicon Kirin 960s
SeriesHiSilicon Qualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameCortex-A73/-A53Cortex-A75 / A55 (Kryo 385)Cortex-A73/-A53
Series: Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9702.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9602.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960s2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710 « 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710A2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 « 2.75 - 2.96 GHz8 / 8 cores2 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55 (Kryo 385)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8452.8 GHz8 / 8 cores2 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55 (Kryo 385)
HiSilicon Kirin 9702.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9602.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960s « 2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 7102.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710A2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Clock2200 MHz2750 - 2960 MHz2100 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8
Transistors5500 Million
Technology12 nm10 nm16 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G51 MP4 GPU, 4x Cortex-A73 (2.2 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.7 GHz, big.LITTLE), LTE Cat-12 600 Mbps Downlink, Cat-13 150 Mbps Uplink, Bluetooth 4.2, WiFi a/b/g/n 2.4 GHz, AGPS, Glonass, BaidouX20 LTE Modem, Adreno 630 GPUARM Mali-G71 MP8 GPU, 4x Cortex-A73 (2.4 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.8 GHz, big.LITTLE), 2x 32 Bit LPDDR4 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-G51 MP4Qualcomm Adreno 630ARM Mali-G71 MP8 ( - 900 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
L1 Cache768 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB
L3 Cache2 MB
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 710
0.5 pt (37%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 SD 850 +
1166 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 SD 850 +
2284 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 SD 850 +
1456 s (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 SD 850 +
37 s (7%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 SD 850 +
4745 Points (8%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 SD 850 +
4.9 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 SD 850 +
28 fps (6%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 SD 850 +
2.3 sec (51%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 SD 850 +
34 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 SD 850 +
75 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 SD 850 +
1678 s (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 SD 850 +
13397 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 SD 850 +
12345 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 11158     avg: 16572     median: 17232.5 (15%)     max: 22668 Points
16059 Points (14%)
14698 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 SD 850 +
1116 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 SD 850 +
2132 Points (4%)
2323 Points (27%)
2101 Points (24%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 330     avg: 330.5     median: 330.5 (14%)     max: 331 Points
148%
1 SD 850 +
488 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1320     avg: 1338     median: 1338 (2%)     max: 1356 Points
144%
1 SD 850 +
1923 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 319     avg: 327     median: 327 (1%)     max: 335 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1266     avg: 1339     median: 1339 (4%)     max: 1412 Points
2269 Points (23%)
1634 Points (16%)
7118 Points (8%)
5809 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1612     avg: 1623     median: 1623 (22%)     max: 1634 Points
1706 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5377     avg: 5447     median: 5447 (13%)     max: 5517 Points
5609 Points (14%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5456 Points (9%)
5734 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1517 Points (23%)
1756 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 1356     avg: 1702     median: 1701.5 (14%)     max: 2047 Points
2165 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 2488     avg: 3017     median: 3017 (27%)     max: 3546 Points
3780 Points (34%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 9096     avg: 9764     median: 9763.5 (19%)     max: 10431 Points
10498 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 4429     avg: 4767     median: 4766.5 (10%)     max: 5104 Points
5303 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 5366     avg: 5857     median: 5856.5 (15%)     max: 6347 Points
6502 Points (17%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 3999     avg: 4223     median: 4205 (5%)     max: 4853 ms
2836 ms (3%)
5947 ms (7%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 9041     avg: 9659     median: 9695 (9%)     max: 10544 Points
13947 Points (13%)
6802 Points (6%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 52     avg: 61.7     median: 62 (13%)     max: 69 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 104012     avg: 108955     median: 110126 (38%)     max: 112870 Points
147305 Points (50%)
8364 Points (26%)
28103 Points (34%)
33870 Points (11%)
43350 Points (27%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 124870     avg: 139210     median: 135942 (24%)     max: 183420 Points
113687 Points (20%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 55985     avg: 58317     median: 58317 (49%)     max: 60649 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 35479     avg: 36250     median: 36250 (29%)     max: 37021 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 28697     avg: 28859     median: 28858.5 (5%)     max: 29020 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 60900     avg: 66675     median: 66674.5 (24%)     max: 72449 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 185725     avg: 190100     median: 190100 (18%)     max: 194475 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 181152     avg: 184162     median: 184162 (24%)     max: 187172 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 3783     avg: 4945     median: 5171.5 (27%)     max: 5286 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 10592     avg: 11047     median: 11046.5 (24%)     max: 11501 Points
5114 Points (33%)
5040 Points (25%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 710 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 → 123% n=5

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 960s → 93% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 25. 11:13:16

#0 checking url part for id 10172 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11391 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9952 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.124s ... 0.125s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.125s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10172 +0.017s ... 0.142s

#8 got single benchmarks 10172 +0.043s ... 0.185s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11391 +0.003s ... 0.188s

#10 got single benchmarks 11391 +0.01s ... 0.198s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9952 +0.003s ... 0.201s

#12 got single benchmarks 9952 +0.007s ... 0.208s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.208s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.184s ... 0.392s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.109s ... 0.5s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.5s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)