Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 658 vs MediaTek MTK 8113T

HiSilicon Kirin 658

► remove from comparison  Kirin 658

The HiSilicon Kirin 658 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC for mid-range smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2017 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores. Four cores can be clocked with up to 1.7 GHz (power saving cores) and four with up to 2.35 GHz (performance cores). The difference to the older Kirin 650 and Kirin 655 SoCs is the higher clock speed of the performance cores (2.35 versus 2.1 and 2.0 GHz).

Furthermore, a ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card (at 900 MHz with 40.8 GFLOPS), a 64-Bit LPDDR3 memory controller and a dual-sim capable LTE Cat. 6 (max. 300 MBit/s and GSM, WCDMA, UMTS, HSPA+) radio are integrated in the SoC. The processor performance can be compared with the older Kirin 930 and therefore sufficient for daily usage as browsing and non demanding apps. High-end SoCs with Cortex-A57 or A72 cores however should be noticeably faster. The SoC is produced in a modern 16nm FinFET process and is therefore very power efficient.

MediaTek MTK 8113T

► remove from comparison

The MediaTek MTK 8113T is a simple SoC for e-ink tablets and e-readers. It is very energy-efficient, but does not support mobile communications or camera functions.

The SoC has two ARM Cortex-A53 cores with a clock speed of up to 2 GHz. LPDDR4 is supported as working memory. WiFi 5 and Bluetooth 5.0 are also on board.

The chip is manufactured using the 12 nm process.

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 658MediaTek MTK 8113T
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Clock2350 MHz2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 82 / 2
2 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Technology16 nm12 nm
FeaturesARMv8-ISA, Mali-T830 MP2, Dual SIM LTE (Cat. 6), LPDDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-T830 MP2 (900 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
13510 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
1608 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
1554 Points (18%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
913 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3460 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
874 Points (12%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3348 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
8591 ms (10%)
min: 16154.2     avg: 16194     median: 16193.8 (19%)     max: 16233.3 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
4589 Points (4%)
min: 1633     avg: 1694     median: 1694 (1%)     max: 1755 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
60438 Points (21%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
4464 Points (29%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
5794 Points (29%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 658 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MTK 8113T → 45% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 17. 16:50:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8960 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18028 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1737129031s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 Jan 2025 09:41:32 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8960 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 8960 +0.004s ... 0.007s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18028 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#10 got single benchmarks 18028 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.011s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.006s ... 0.016s

#13 return log +0.016s ... 0.032s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)