, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

HiSilicon Kirin 650 vs MediaTek MT8161

HiSilicon Kirin 650

► remove from comparison Kirin 650

The HiSilicon Kirin 650 is an ARM-based octa-core SoC for mid-range smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2016 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores. Four cores can be clocked with up to 1.7 GHz (power saving cores) and four with up to 2 GHz (performance cores). Furthermore, a ARM Mali-T830 MP2 graphics card (at 600 MHz with 40.8 GFLOPS), a 64-Bit LPDDR3 memory controller and a dual-sim capable LTE Cat. 6 (max. 300 MBit/s and GSM, WCDMA, UMTS, HSPA+) radio are integrated in the SoC.

The processor performance can be compared with the older Kirin 930 and therefore sufficient for daily usage as browsing and non demanding apps. High-end SoCs with Cortex-A57 or A72 cores however should be noticeably faster.

The SoC is produced in a modern 16nm FinFET process and is therefore very power efficient.

 

MediaTek MT8161

► remove from comparison

The MediaTek MT8161 is an ARM based entry-level to mid-range SoC for (Android based) tablets. It offers four ARM Cortex-A53 processor cores (quad-core) that are clocked with up to 1.3 GHz. Furthermore, an ARM Mali-720 graphics card, a LPDDR3 memory controller (e.g., accessing 1 GB in the Lenovo Tab 2 A8-50), Bluetooth 4.0 and dual-band 802.11 b/g/n are integrated in the SoC.

The performance is situated in the entry level of 2015 and often similar to the Kirin 910T (see benchmark below).

HiSilicon Kirin 650MediaTek MT8161
Mediatek
Cortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
» HiSilicon Kirin 6502 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT81611.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6502 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
» MediaTek MT81611.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
2000 MHz1300 MHz
8 / 84 / 4
16 28
ARMv8-ISA, Mali-T830 MP2, Dual SIM LTE (Cat. 6), LPDDR3 Memory ControllerLP-DDR3 memory controller, 1080p video encode, 1080p video decode, embedded GPS / GLONASS / BeiDou module, Bluetooth 4.0, FM radio support, ARM Jazelle, ARM TrustZone
iGPUARM Mali-T830 MP2 (900 MHz)ARM Mali-T720 MP2
ArchitectureARMARM

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 MT8161 +
8693 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
11640 Points (12%)
8398 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 13588     avg: 13632     median: 13632 (14%)     max: 13676 Points
9598 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
1440 Points (18%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3768     avg: 3841     median: 3841 (6%)     max: 3914
1838 (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 883     avg: 895     median: 894.5 (18%)     max: 906
616 (13%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 9111.2     avg: 9254     median: 9253.9 (16%)     max: 9396.5 ms
24610 ms (41%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 MT8161 +
1713 ms (19%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 MT8161 +
1654 ms (16%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4188     avg: 4472     median: 4472 (6%)     max: 4756 Points
2510 Points (4%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
1434 Points (38%)
911 Points (24%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
1965 Points (44%)
1398 Points (31%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
3356 Points (44%)
1866 Points (25%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 MT8161 +
7512 points (17%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
100%
1 MT8161 +
26820 Points (27%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 50366     avg: 51755     median: 51754.5 (18%)     max: 53143 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 MT8161 +
768 Iter./s (24%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 MT8161 +
7742 Iter./s (25%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
142543 Points (19%)
43768 Points (6%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5120     avg: 5230     median: 5229.5 (26%)     max: 5339 Points
3396 Points (17%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 650 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT8161 → 61% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 02. 15:42:42

#0 checking url part for id 8075 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6882 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 01 Aug 2021 13:08:38 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.041s ... 0.041s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.041s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8075 +0s ... 0.042s

#7 got single benchmarks 8075 +0.008s ... 0.05s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6882 +0s ... 0.05s

#9 got single benchmarks 6882 +0.008s ... 0.058s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.058s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.067s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.07s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)