Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 620 vs MediaTek MT8161

HiSilicon Kirin 620

► remove from comparison  Kirin 620

The HiSilicon Kirin 620 is an ARM-based octa core SoC for mid-range smartphones. It was announced at the end of 2014 and features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores at 1.2 GHz (max.). Furthermore, the processor integrates a ARM Mali-450 MP4 graphics card, an LPDDR3 memory controller, an LTE Cat.4 modem, 802.11n WiFi and Bluetooth 4.0. The chip is manufactured in 28nm and relatively power efficient.

MediaTek MT8161

► remove from comparison

The MediaTek MT8161 is an ARM based entry-level to mid-range SoC for (Android based) tablets. It offers four ARM Cortex-A53 processor cores (quad-core) that are clocked with up to 1.3 GHz. Furthermore, an ARM Mali-720 graphics card, a LPDDR3 memory controller (e.g., accessing 1 GB in the Lenovo Tab 2 A8-50), Bluetooth 4.0 and dual-band 802.11 b/g/n are integrated in the SoC.

The performance is situated in the entry level of 2015 and often similar to the Kirin 910T (see benchmark below).

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 620MediaTek MT8161
Series Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Cortex-A53
JLQ JR510 compare1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 650 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 « 1.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT81611.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
JLQ JR510 compare1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 650 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6201.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 « 1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1200 MHz1300 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 84 / 4
Technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesARMv8-ISA, Mali-450 MP4, LTE (Cat. 4), LPDDR3 Memory ControllerLP-DDR3 memory controller, 1080p video encode, 1080p video decode, embedded GPS / GLONASS / BeiDou module, Bluetooth 4.0, FM radio support, ARM Jazelle, ARM TrustZone
iGPUARM Mali-450 MP4ARM Mali-T720 MP2
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 6531     avg: 6885     median: 6884.5 (4%)     max: 7238 Points
8693 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 6434     avg: 6917     median: 6916.5 (6%)     max: 7399 Points
8398 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 6861     avg: 7534     median: 7533.5 (6%)     max: 8206 Points
9598 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2151     avg: 2453     median: 2452.5 (4%)     max: 2754 Points
1838 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 541     avg: 565     median: 564.5 (8%)     max: 588 Points
616 Points (9%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
166 MFLOPS (6%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
52 MFLOPS (5%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 15866     avg: 17376     median: 17375.5 (20%)     max: 18885 ms
24610 ms (29%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1373     avg: 1680     median: 1679.5 (18%)     max: 1986 ms
1713 ms (19%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 MT8161 +
1654 ms (16%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 1857     avg: 2170     median: 2170 (2%)     max: 2483 Points
2510 Points (3%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
907 Points (24%)
911 Points (24%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
1104 Points (25%)
1398 Points (31%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
1146 Points (15%)
1866 Points (25%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 MT8161 +
7512 points (17%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
min: 30558     avg: 32403     median: 32402.5 (33%)     max: 34247 Points
26820 Points (27%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 MT8161 +
768 Iter./s (24%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 MT8161 +
7742 Iter./s (25%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 MT8161 +
43768 Points (6%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
3717 Points (19%)
3396 Points (17%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 620 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT8161 → 110% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.22
log 06. 04:27:43

#0 checking url part for id 6667 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6882 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 Feb 2023 08:57:17 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.078s ... 0.079s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.079s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 6667 +0.002s ... 0.081s

#7 got single benchmarks 6667 +0.01s ... 0.09s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6882 +0.002s ... 0.092s

#9 got single benchmarks 6882 +0.011s ... 0.103s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.103s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.064s ... 0.167s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.192s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)