, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD Turion II Neo K685 vs AMD Turion II Neo K645

AMD Turion II Neo K685

► remove from comparison

The AMD Turion II Neo Dual-Core K685 is a laptop processor for small and light subnotebooks. It is based on the Champlain core (K10 architecture) and should be similar to the desktop Athlon II line. The K685 offers an integrated DDR3 memory controller and a 1600 MHz 16 Bit HyperTransport 3.0 (HT3200) link.

AMD Turion II Neo K645

► remove from comparison

The AMD Turion II Neo K645 is a laptop processor for small and thin subnotebooks. It is part of the Nile platform in conjunction with the AMD M880G chipset (Radeon HD 4225 on board graphics). Compared to the slower Athlon II and V Series CPUs, the Turion II offers a 128 Bit FPU and 1.6 GHz HyperTransport Link (compared to 64 Bit and 1 GHz). The integrated memory controller supports DDR3-1066 memory.

The performance of the CPU is compareable with 1.3-1.4 GHz Core 2 Duo processors (e.g., SU7300, SU9400). The power consumption of a Nile platform laptop (M301z) was higher than compareable SU based Intel systems. Still, the PCMark Vantage results were better.

AMD Turion II Neo K685AMD Turion II Neo K645
AMD Turion II NeoAMD Turion II Neo
GenevaGeneva
Series: Turion II Neo Geneva
» AMD Turion II Neo K6851.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD Turion II Neo K665 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD Turion II Neo K6451.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD Turion II Neo K625 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD Turion II Neo K6851.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD Turion II Neo K665 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2
» AMD Turion II Neo K6451.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD Turion II Neo K625 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
1800 MHz1600 MHz
32003200
256 KB
1 MB1 MB
2 / 22 / 2
15 15
45 45
S1g4S1
integrated DDR3 memory controller, MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
Architecturex86x86

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 K685 +
1 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 K685 +
1424 (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 K685 +
3083 (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 K685 +
3839 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 K685 +
1765 Points (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 K685 +
1410 s (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 K685 +
42 s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 K685 +
1451 Points (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 K685 +
42 s (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 K685 +
115 s (5%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 K685 +
2517 s (11%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 K685 +
4.8 Points (62%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Turion II Neo K685 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 26. 03:44:34

#0 checking url part for id 1539 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1537 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Sep 2021 13:09:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 1539 +0s ... 0.004s

#7 got single benchmarks 1539 +0.006s ... 0.01s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 1537 +0s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 1537 +0s ... 0.011s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.011s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.015s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.019s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)