Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron J1850 vs Intel Celeron J1900

Intel Celeron J1850

► remove from comparison Intel J1850

The Intel Celeron J1850 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for desktops and nettops. It is clocked at up to 2.0 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-D platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and a clock speed of up to 2.0 GHz, the Celeron J1850 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the D2560. Presumably, the J1850 even competes with some of the Kabini APUs like the AMD A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 792 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 10 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact nettops.

Intel Celeron J1900

► remove from comparison Intel J1900

The Intel Celeron J1900 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for desktops and nettops. It is clocked at 2.0 - 2.42 GHz (Burst) and part of the Bay Trail-D platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and a clock speed of up to 2.42 GHz, the Celeron J1900 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the D2560. Presumably, the J1900 even outperforms the AMD Kabini APU A4-5000. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up 688 - 854 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 10 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact nettops.

ModelIntel Celeron J1850Intel Celeron J1900
CodenameBay Trail-DBay Trail-D
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-D
Intel Celeron J19002 - 2.42 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J1850 « 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J1800 compare2.41 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J1750 compare2.41 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J1900 « 2 - 2.42 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J18502 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J1800 compare2.41 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron J1750 compare2.41 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 MHz2000 - 2420 MHz
L1 Cache224 KB224 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
TDP10 Watt10 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, max. 792 MHz), Dual-Channel DDR3-1333 Memory ControllerIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 688 - 854 MHz), Dual-Channel DDR3(L)-1333 Memory Controller, CPU Burst
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (688 - 792 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (688 - 854 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$82 U.S.$82 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 11. 08:00:08

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4517 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 4768 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1733900408s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 10 Dec 2024 05:18:26 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 4517 +0s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 4517 +0s ... 0.005s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 4768 +0s ... 0.006s

#10 got single benchmarks 4768 +0s ... 0.006s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.006s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.006s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.007s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)