Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Intel HD Graphics 505

Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580

► remove

The Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580 (GT4e) is an integrated professional graphics unit of the Skylake generation (top version). As successors of the Iris Graphics 6200 (Broadwell), the Iris P580 can be found in some high-end Xeon quad core CPUs and offers 128 MB of dedicated eDRAM memory. Furthermore, the so-called GT4e-version features 72 Execution Units (EUs). Besides the eDRAM cache, the Iris 580 is able to access the main memory (2x 64bit DDR3L-1600 / DDR4-2133).

Compared to the consumer Iris Pro Graphics 580, the P580 is only included in the Xeon processors and intended for professional applications (certified drivers?) similar to the Quadro and Fire Pro lines. 

Compared to the Iris Graphics 550 (28 W GT3e), the Iris Pro Graphics P580 offers more EUs (72 vs. 48) and a larger eDRAM Cache (128 vs. 64 MB).

Performance

The exact performance of the Iris Graphics P580 depends on memory configuration and CPU model (different clock speeds). However, it should be clearly faster than the old Broadwell Iris Pro 6200 and may compete with a dedicated GeForce 945M. Modern games of 2015/2016 should be playable in medium settings.

Features

The revised video engine now decodes H.265/HEVC completely in hardware and thereby much more efficiently than before. Displays can be connected via DP 1.2 / eDP 1.3 (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 60 Hz), whereas HDMI is limited to the older version 1.4 (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 30 Hz). However, HDMI 2.0 can be added using a DisplayPort converter. Up to three displays can be controlled simultaneously.

Power Consumption

The Iris Graphics P580 can be found in some mobile high-end quad core processors (45 W). Therefore, they are most likely not used in thin and light laptops.

Intel HD Graphics 505

► remove Intel HD Graphics 505

The Intel HD Graphics 505 is an integrated processor graphics unit from the Apollo Lake generation (e. g. Pentium N4200), which was announced mid 2016. The GPU can convince with low consumption figures, but the performance is only in the low-end segment and is rarely sufficient for modern games. Being the maximum configuration of the Apollo Lake GPU, the HD Graphics 505 is equipped with 18 Execution Units (EUs) running at up to 750 MHz. The technical specifications of the GPU are based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which is also used for the more expensive Skylake series.

Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the HD 505 has to access the main memory via processor (2x 64bit DDR3L-/LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400).

Performance

The HD Graphics 505 should be slightly slower than the older Core-M GPU HD Graphics 5300, so modern games (as of 2016) will rarely run smoothly even at the lowest settings.

Features

The revised video engine now decodes H.265/HEVC completely in hardware and thereby much more efficiently than before. Up to three displays can be connected via DP/eDP or HDMI (4K probably only at 30 Hz via HDMI 1.4).

Power Consumption

The TDP of the whole Pentium N4200 chip is 6 Watts by default, so the GPU is primarily used for (often passively cooled) netbooks or thin notebooks. The TDP can also be reduced to 4 Watts, but this will obviously affect the performance.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics P580Intel HD Graphics 505
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Gen. 9 Series
Iris Pro Graphics P580 72 @ 350 - 1100 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 580 (compare) 72 @ 350 - 1050 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 550 (compare) 48 @ 300 - 1100 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 540 (compare) 48 @ 300 - 1050 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 530 (compare) 24 @ 350 - 1150 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 520 (compare) 24 @ 300 - 1050 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 515 (compare) 24 @ 300 - 1000 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 610 (compare) 12 @ 300 - 950 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 510 (compare) 12 @ 300 - 950 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 605 (compare) 18 @ 300 - 750 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 505 18 @ 300 - 750 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 600 (compare) 12 @ 300 - 700 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 500 (compare) 12 @ 300 - 700 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics P580 72 @ 350 - 1100 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Pro Graphics 580 (compare) 72 @ 350 - 1050 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 550 (compare) 48 @ 300 - 1100 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Iris Graphics 540 (compare) 48 @ 300 - 1050 (Boost) MHzeDRAM + 64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 530 (compare) 24 @ 350 - 1150 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 520 (compare) 24 @ 300 - 1050 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 515 (compare) 24 @ 300 - 1000 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 610 (compare) 12 @ 300 - 950 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 510 (compare) 12 @ 300 - 950 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 605 (compare) 18 @ 300 - 750 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 505 18 @ 300 - 750 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
UHD Graphics 600 (compare) 12 @ 300 - 700 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
HD Graphics 500 (compare) 12 @ 300 - 700 (Boost) MHz64/128 Bit
CodenameSkylake GT4eApollo Lake
ArchitectureIntel Gen. 9 (Skylake)Intel Gen. 9 (Apollo Lake)
72 - 18 -
Core350 - 1100 (Boost) MHz300 - 750 (Boost) MHz
BuseDRAM + 64/128 Bit64/128 Bit
MemoryeDRAM(LP)DDR3(L) / LPDDR4
Max. Memory128 MB
yesyes
DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 12_1)DirectX 12 (FL 12_1)
Technology14 nm14 nm
FeaturesQuickSyncQuickSync
Introduced24.01.2016 01.09.2016
CPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v54 x 3000 MHz, 45 W350 MHz1100 MHz

3DMark - Time Spy Score 2560x1440
min: 87     avg: 115.8     median: 107 (1%)     max: 161 Points
3DMark - Time Spy Graphics 2560x1440
min: 76     avg: 101.5     median: 94 (1%)     max: 142 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
min: 27199     avg: 32979     median: 32480 (6%)     max: 41454 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 17895     avg: 21634.2     median: 19899 (3%)     max: 28843 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Score 1280x720
min: 2411     avg: 2877     median: 2837 (5%)     max: 3558 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 2844     avg: 3609     median: 3413 (2%)     max: 4738 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Score 1920x1080
min: 324     avg: 417.3     median: 383 (1%)     max: 565 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Graphics 1920x1080
min: 344     avg: 448.6     median: 408 (1%)     max: 606 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 26964     avg: 33899.2     median: 36228 (5%)     max: 39766 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance 1280x720
min: 476     avg: 692.2     median: 679 (2%)     max: 899 points
3DMark 11 - Performance GPU 1280x720
min: 424     avg: 631.8     median: 620 (1%)     max: 825 points
3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics 505
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics 505
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics 505
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - high, Tesselation (normal), DirectX11 1280x1024
8.9 fps (4%)
SPECviewperf 11
Siemens NX 1920x1080 + Intel HD Graphics 505
Tcvis 1920x1080 + Intel HD Graphics 505
SolidWorks 1920x1080 + Intel HD Graphics 505
Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 + Intel HD Graphics 505
Maya 1920x1080 + Intel HD Graphics 505
Lightwave 1920x1080 + Intel HD Graphics 505
Ensight 1920x1080 + Intel HD Graphics 505
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit + Intel HD Graphics 505
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit + Intel HD Graphics 505
Cinebench R15
OpenGL 64Bit + Intel HD Graphics 505
Ref. Match 64Bit + Intel HD Graphics 505
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + Intel HD Graphics 505
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Intel HD Graphics 505
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
18.9 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
29.2 fps (8%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
10.3 fps (3%)
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
16.6 fps (10%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Room GPUs-only
min: 62     avg: 87     median: 87 (2%)     max: 112 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - Sala GPUs-only
min: 93     avg: 141.5     median: 141 (1%)     max: 190 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - Normal, Score 1024x600
382 Points (1%)
Power Consumption - FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test - Power Consumption (external Monitor) 1280x720 *
19 Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel HD Graphics 505 → 100%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
4.8  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
1  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
2  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
3.7  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
3  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
5.5  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
2.8  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
2  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
2  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
ELEX

ELEX

2017
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
4.6  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
F1 2017

F1 2017

2017
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
13  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
28  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
25.2  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
14.7  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
21.4 26.6 ~ 24 fps
med. 1920x1080
HD Graphics 505:
15.3  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
5.4  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
5.9  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
12.1  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
14.4  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
2.3  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
9.7  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
5.1  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
7.1  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
5.2  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
3.1  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
3  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
5.6 6.1 6.2 8.8 ~ 7 fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
4 4 4.1 4.5 ~ 4 fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
15  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
8.9  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
6.6  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
4.1  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
10.9  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
6.3  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
11.8  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
6.5  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
25.2  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
16.4  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
20.7  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
13.8  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
32  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
22  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
36.5  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
12.7  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
9.5  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
4.3  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
7.3  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
6.9  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
10.6  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
7.5  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
28  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
14  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
18.3  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
14.1  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
12.4  fps
med. 1344x756
HD Graphics 505:
7.7  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
75.2  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
18.4  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
14.2  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
9.3  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
51.5  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
19  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
6.5 7.8 ~ 7 fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
4.2 5.1 ~ 5 fps
high 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
3.5  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
17.1 20.9 ~ 19 fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
13.5 15.2 ~ 14 fps
high 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
8.3 9.5 ~ 9 fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
36.8  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
19.4  fps
high 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
12.5  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
19.4 21 21.2 21.3 22.2 22.9 23.7 23.9 24.6 24.9 25.4 25.5 30.3 30.6 32.3 ~ 25 fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
8.3 10.2 10.7 10.8 12.2 12.9 13.3 13.6 14 14.2 14.4 17.3 17.5 18.6 ~ 13 fps
high 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
9.2 9.4 10.9 10.9 11 11.3 11.5 11.5 12 15.1 16.2 ~ 12 fps
ultra 1920x1080
HD Graphics 505:
2.5 3.1 ~ 3 fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
31.2 42.9 ~ 37 fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
17.4 21.6 ~ 20 fps
high 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
11.2  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
34.6  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
16.9  fps
high 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
13.5  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
35 36.7 ~ 36 fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
30.9 31 ~ 31 fps
high 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
21.2  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
30.1  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
19.6  fps
high 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
17  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
Anno 2070

Anno 2070

2011
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
31.1  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
14.8  fps
high 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
9.3  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1280x720
HD Graphics 505:
21.1  fps
med. 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
11.6  fps
high 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
7.1  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
31.3  fps
high 1366x768
HD Graphics 505:
18.9  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
Dirt 3

Dirt 3

2011
low 800x600
HD Graphics 505:
47.2  fps
med. 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
25.2  fps
high 1360x768
HD Graphics 505:
15.7  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
low 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
69.7  fps
med. 1360x768
HD Graphics 505:
15.9  fps
high 1360x768
HD Graphics 505:
9.7  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
HD Graphics 505:
62.3  fps
med. 1024x768
HD Graphics 505:
25.2  fps
HD Graphics 505:
»

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)