Intel HD Graphics 500 vs Intel HD Graphics 505 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
Intel HD Graphics 500 ► remove from comparison
The Intel HD Graphics 500 is an integrated processor graphics unit from the Apollo Lake generation (e. g. Celeron N3450 and Celeron N3350), which was announced mid 2016. The GPU can convince with low consumption figures, but the performance is only in the low-end segment and is rarely sufficient for modern games. Being a partial configuration of the Apollo Lake GPU, the HD Graphics 505 is equipped with just 12 Execution Units (EUs) (HD Graphics 505: 18 EUs) running at up to 650-700 MHz depending on the model. The technical specifications of the GPU are based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which is also used for the more expensive Skylake series.
Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the HD 505 has to access the main memory via processor (2x 64bit DDR3L-/LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400).
Performance
The HD Graphics 505 should be slightly slower than the older Broadwell GPU HD Graphics (Broadwell) , so modern games (as of 2016) will rarely run smoothly even at the lowest settings.
Features
The revised video engine now decodes H.265/HEVC completely in hardware and thereby much more efficiently than before. Up to three displays can be connected via DP/eDP or HDMI (4K probably only at 30 Hz via HDMI 1.4).
Power Consumption
The TDP of the whole Pentium N4200 chip is 6 Watts by default, so the GPU is primarily used for (often passively cooled) netbooks or thin notebooks. The TDP can also be reduced to 4 Watts, but this will obviously affect the performance.
Intel HD Graphics 505 ► remove from comparison
The Intel HD Graphics 505 is an integrated processor graphics unit from the Apollo Lake generation (e. g. Pentium N4200), which was announced mid 2016. The GPU can convince with low consumption figures, but the performance is only in the low-end segment and is rarely sufficient for modern games. Being the maximum configuration of the Apollo Lake GPU, the HD Graphics 505 is equipped with 18 Execution Units (EUs) running at up to 750 MHz. The technical specifications of the GPU are based on Intel's Gen9 architecture, which is also used for the more expensive Skylake series.
Due to its lack of dedicated graphics memory or eDRAM cache, the HD 505 has to access the main memory via processor (2x 64bit DDR3L-/LPDDR3-1866, LPDDR4-2400).
Performance
The HD Graphics 505 should be slightly slower than the older Core-M GPU HD Graphics 5300 , so modern games (as of 2016) will rarely run smoothly even at the lowest settings.
Features
The revised video engine now decodes H.265/HEVC completely in hardware and thereby much more efficiently than before. Up to three displays can be connected via DP/eDP or HDMI (4K probably only at 30 Hz via HDMI 1.4).
Power Consumption
The TDP of the whole Pentium N4200 chip is 6 Watts by default, so the GPU is primarily used for (often passively cooled) netbooks or thin notebooks. The TDP can also be reduced to 4 Watts, but this will obviously affect the performance.
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 ► remove from comparison
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 (GT4e) is an integrated graphics unit of the Skylake generation (top version). As successors of the Iris Graphics 6200 (Broadwell), the Iris 580 can be found in some high-end quad core CPUs and offers 128 MB of dedicated eDRAM memory. Furthermore, the so-called GT4e-version features 72 Execution Units (EUs). Besides the eDRAM cache, the Iris 580 is able to access the main memory (2x 64bit DDR3L-1600 / DDR4-2133).
Compared to the Iris Graphics 550 (28 W GT3e), the Iris Pro Graphics 580 offers more EUs (72 vs. 48) and a larger eDRAM Cache (128 vs. 64 MB).
Performance
The exact performance of the Iris Graphics 580 depends on memory configuration and CPU model (different clock speeds). However, it should be clearly faster than the old Broadwell Iris Pro 6200 and may compete with a dedicated GeForce 945M . Modern games of 2015/2016 should be playable in medium settings.
Features
The revised video engine now decodes H.265/HEVC completely in hardware and thereby much more efficiently than before. Displays can be connected via DP 1.2 / eDP 1.3 (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 60 Hz), whereas HDMI is limited to the older version 1.4 (max. 3840 x 2160 @ 30 Hz). However, HDMI 2.0 can be added using a DisplayPort converter. Up to three displays can be controlled simultaneously.
Power Consumption
The Iris Graphics 580 can be found in some mobile high-end quad core processors (45 W). Therefore, they are most likely not used in thin and light laptops.
Intel HD Graphics 500 Intel HD Graphics 505 Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 Gen. 9 Series Codename Apollo Lake Apollo Lake Skylake GT4e Architecture Gen. 9 Apollo Lake Gen. 9 Apollo Lake Gen. 9 Skylake Pipelines 12 - unified 18 - unified 72 - unified Core Speed 300 - 700 (Boost) MHz 300 - 750 (Boost) MHz 350 - 1050 (Boost) MHz Memory Bus Width 64/128 Bit 64/128 Bit eDRAM + 64/128 Bit Shared Memory yes yes yes API DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.4 technology 14 nm 14 nm 14 nm Features QuickSync QuickSync QuickSync Date of Announcement 01.09.2016 01.09.2016 24.01.2016 Memory Type eDRAM Max. Amount of Memory 128 MB
CPU in HD Graphics 500 GPU Base Speed GPU Boost / Turbo Intel Celeron J3455 4 x 1500 MHz, 10 W 250 MHz 750 MHz Intel Celeron N3450 4 x 1100 MHz, 6 W 200 MHz 700 MHz Intel Celeron J3355 2 x 2000 MHz, 10 W 250 MHz 700 MHz Intel Celeron N3350 2 x 1100 MHz, 6 W 200 MHz 650 MHz min. - max. 200 - 250 MHz 650 - 750 MHz
CPU in HD Graphics 505 GPU Base Speed GPU Boost / Turbo Intel Pentium N4200 4 x 1100 MHz, 6 W 200 MHz 750 MHz Intel Atom x7-E3950 4 x 1600 MHz, 12 W 500 MHz 650 MHz min. - max. 200 - 500 MHz 650 - 750 MHz
CPU in Iris Pro Graphics 580 GPU Base Speed GPU Boost / Turbo Intel Core i7-6970HQ 4 x 2800 MHz, 45 W 350 MHz 1050 MHz Intel Core i7-6870HQ 4 x 2700 MHz, 45 W 350 MHz 1000 MHz Intel Core i7-6770HQ 4 x 2600 MHz, 45 W 350 MHz 950 MHz Intel Core i5-6350HQ 4 x 2300 MHz, 45 W 350 MHz 900 MHz min. - max. 200 - 500 MHz 650 - 1050 MHz
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - HD Graphics 500
0.2 pt (0%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - HD Graphics 505
0.2 pt (1%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Iris Pro Graphics 580
0.9 pt (3%)
...
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 87 avg: 115.8 median: 107.5 (0%) max: 161 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 76 avg: 101.5 median: 94 (0%) max: 142 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 19294 avg: 24491 median: 24609 (3%) max: 29579 Points
min: 27199 avg: 32979 median: 32480.5 (4%) max: 41454 Points
184880 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 12299 avg: 15195 median: 15085 (2%) max: 18200 Points
min: 8531 avg: 19014 median: 18860 (2%) max: 28843 Points
98218 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 1932 avg: 2140 median: 2116 (2%) max: 2306 Points
min: 2411 avg: 2877 median: 2837.5 (3%) max: 3558 Points
11346 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 2578 avg: 3030 median: 3007 (1%) max: 3693 Points
min: 2844 avg: 3609 median: 3413.5 (1%) max: 4738 Points
14594 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 271 avg: 321.5 median: 307 (1%) max: 401 Points
min: 324 avg: 417.3 median: 383 (1%) max: 565 Points
1836 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 293 avg: 355.9 median: 362.5 (0%) max: 444 Points
min: 344 avg: 448.6 median: 408 (0%) max: 606 Points
1903 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 20140 avg: 26074 median: 23761 (3%) max: 34320 Points
min: 26964 avg: 33899 median: 36228 (4%) max: 39766 Points
149585 Points (18%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 414 avg: 533 median: 530 (1%) max: 655 Points
min: 476 avg: 692 median: 679 (1%) max: 899 Points
3510 Points (5%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 368 avg: 478.6 median: 482 (0%) max: 584 Points
min: 424 avg: 632 median: 620 (1%) max: 825 Points
3220 Points (3%)
3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total + Intel HD Graphics 505 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 1957 avg: 2351 median: 2350.5 (1%) max: 2744 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + Intel HD Graphics 505 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 1656 avg: 2073 median: 2072.5 (1%) max: 2489 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics 500
min: 3393 avg: 3551 median: 3506 (5%) max: 3753 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel HD Graphics 505
min: 3721 avg: 4303 median: 4302.5 (6%) max: 4884 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
8.9 fps (2%)
SPECviewperf 11 specvp11 snx-01 + Intel HD Graphics 505 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
0.9 fps (1%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + Intel HD Graphics 505 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
1.2 fps (1%)
specvp11 sw-02 + Intel HD Graphics 505 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
6.6 fps (5%)
specvp11 proe-05 + Intel HD Graphics 505 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
0.8 fps (1%)
specvp11 maya-03 + Intel HD Graphics 505 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
5.6 fps (4%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + Intel HD Graphics 505 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
8.7 fps (9%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + Intel HD Graphics 505 SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
1.3 fps (1%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel HD Graphics 500 Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 2791 avg: 2888 median: 2894 (2%) max: 3031 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel HD Graphics 505
min: 32.61 avg: 2776 median: 3155 (2%) max: 3331 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
11355 Points (8%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500 Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 7.05 avg: 8.2 median: 8.1 (3%) max: 9.61 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 505
min: 9.78 avg: 12.1 median: 12.5 (4%) max: 13.53 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
63 fps (22%)
Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 10.15 avg: 12.9 median: 13 (1%) max: 15.74 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 505
min: 11.3 avg: 16.1 median: 16.6 (1%) max: 19.87 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
min: 85.1 avg: 85.6 median: 85.6 (5%) max: 86 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 500 Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.7 avg: 97.8 median: 97.8 (98%) max: 98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel HD Graphics 505
min: 97.7 avg: 97.8 median: 97.8 (98%) max: 97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
min: 97.8 avg: 97.9 median: 97.8 (98%) max: 98 %
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3.6 fps (1%)
4.8 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
9.7 fps (1%)
12 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
8.4 fps (1%)
min: 10 avg: 10.2 median: 10.2 (1%) max: 10.3 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
15 fps (0%)
14.1 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
20 fps (1%)
18.9 fps (1%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel HD Graphics 500 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
42 fps (0%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Intel HD Graphics 505 47.2 fps (0%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
16.3 fps (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
49 Samples/s (0%)
min: 62 avg: 87 median: 87 (0%) max: 112 Samples/s
362 Samples/s (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
79 Samples/s (0%)
min: 93 avg: 141.5 median: 141.5 (0%) max: 190 Samples/s
875 Samples/s (2%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 296 avg: 320 median: 324 (0%) max: 336 Points
382 Points (0%)
2308 Points (2%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.9 Watt (1%)
19 Watt (3%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
450 MHz (18%)
Average Benchmarks Intel HD Graphics 500 → 100% n=16 Average Benchmarks Intel HD Graphics 505 → 132% n=16 Average Benchmarks Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 → 625% n=16
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
100%
HD Graphics 500:
9.1 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
23.9 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
24 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
11.2 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
28.2 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
20.2 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
13.9 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12.6 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
2 fps
50%
HD Graphics 505:
1 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
3 fps
67%
HD Graphics 505:
2 fps
HD Graphics 500:
0 (!) [X] Jumper EZbook 3 Intel Celeron N3350 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 500
Problem during benchmarking occured: game wont start fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
5.5 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
1 fps
300%
HD Graphics 505:
3 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
1 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
34.4 (!) [X] Jumper EZbook 3 Intel Celeron N3350 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 500
Problem during benchmarking occured: error at the endmax:
93 fps
fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
4.6 (!) [X] Jumper EZbook 3 Intel Celeron N3350 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 500
Problem during benchmarking occured: error at the endmax:
9 fps
fps
92%
HD Graphics 505:
5.5 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
3.9 4.7 ~ 4 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
3.6 4.3 ~ 4 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
10 fps
140%
HD Graphics 505:
28 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
17.2 fps
147%
HD Graphics 505:
25.2 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
10 fps
147%
HD Graphics 505:
14.7 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
5.6 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
18.1 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
6.2 fps
247%
HD Graphics 505:
15.3 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
4.9 fps
110%
HD Graphics 505:
5.4 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
8.7 fps
139%
HD Graphics 505:
12.1 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
15.9 fps
45%
HD Graphics 505:
7.1 fps
381%
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
60.5 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
53.3 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
42.9 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
23.1 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
0 (!) fps
HD Graphics 505:
5.6 6.1 6.2 8.8 [X] Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P2CP Intel Pentium N4200 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 505
~ 7 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
30.2 fps
HD Graphics 505:
4 4 4.1 4.5 [X] Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P2CP Intel Pentium N4200 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 505
~ 4 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
18.2 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
12.2 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
8.9 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
15.5 fps
97%
HD Graphics 505:
15 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
0 (!) fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
19.1 fps
132%
HD Graphics 505:
25.2 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
16.4 fps
126%
HD Graphics 505:
20.7 fps
365%
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
59.9 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
9.7 fps
142%
HD Graphics 505:
13.8 fps
604%
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
58.6 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
23 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
14.9 fps
145%
HD Graphics 505:
32 fps
272%
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
59.8 fps
147%
HD Graphics 505:
22 fps
248%
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
37.2 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
5.6 fps
273%
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
15.3 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
5.1 fps
275%
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
14 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
0 (!) fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
28.5 fps
128%
HD Graphics 505:
36.5 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12.5 fps
102%
HD Graphics 505:
12.7 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
22 fps
127%
HD Graphics 505:
28 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
16 fps
88%
HD Graphics 505:
14 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
17.7 fps
70%
HD Graphics 505:
12.4 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
71.6 fps
105%
HD Graphics 505:
75.2 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
13.7 fps
134%
HD Graphics 505:
18.4 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
10 fps
142%
HD Graphics 505:
14.2 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
6.3 fps
148%
HD Graphics 505:
9.3 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
43.8 fps
118%
HD Graphics 505:
51.5 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
19.1 fps
99%
HD Graphics 505:
19 fps
HD Graphics 505:
6.5 [X] Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P2CP Intel Pentium N4200 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 505
7.8 ~ 7 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
43.8 fps
HD Graphics 505:
4.2 [X] Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P2CP Intel Pentium N4200 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 505
5.1 ~ 5 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
30.1 fps
HD Graphics 505:
3.5 [X] Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P2CP Intel Pentium N4200 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 505
fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
25 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
12.4 fps
HD Graphics 505:
8.3 9.5 ~ 9 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
29.3 fps
126%
HD Graphics 505:
36.8 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
14.4 fps
135%
HD Graphics 505:
19.4 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
63.7 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
50.8 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
28.5 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
14.3 fps
507%
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
101.3 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
8.8 9.6 9.8 [X] Acer Aspire 1 A114-31-C472 Intel Celeron N3450 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 500
11 13 ~ 10 fps
579%
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
57.9 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
7.9 8.9 [X] Acer Aspire 1 A114-31-C472 Intel Celeron N3450 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 500
9.7 ~ 9 fps
567%
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
51 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
2.7 fps
111%
HD Graphics 505:
2.5 3.1 [X] Acer Swift 1 SF113-31-P2CP Intel Pentium N4200 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 505
~ 3 fps
552%
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
14.9 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
380.6 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
127.1 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
73.6 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
36.2 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
21.5 fps
172%
HD Graphics 505:
31.2 42.9 [X] Dell Latitude 3189 N002L318911EMEA Intel Pentium N4200 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 505
~ 37 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
9.3 fps
215%
HD Graphics 505:
17.4 21.6 [X] Dell Latitude 3189 N002L318911EMEA Intel Pentium N4200 1.1GHz
HD Graphics 505
~ 20 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
19.3 fps
179%
HD Graphics 505:
34.6 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
9.1 fps
186%
HD Graphics 505:
16.9 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
115.8 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
38.7 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
16.7 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
14 16.6 ~ 15 fps
240%
HD Graphics 505:
35 36.7 ~ 36 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
14 fps
221%
HD Graphics 505:
30.9 31 ~ 31 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
107.2 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
81.2 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
37.3 fps
Iris Pro Graphics 580:
8.8 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12.7 22 ~ 17 fps
177%
HD Graphics 505:
30.1 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
13.6 fps
144%
HD Graphics 505:
19.6 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
27.8 fps
112%
HD Graphics 505:
31.1 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
12.2 fps
121%
HD Graphics 505:
14.8 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
11.2 fps
188%
HD Graphics 505:
21.1 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
7.6 fps
153%
HD Graphics 505:
11.6 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
22.9 fps
137%
HD Graphics 505:
31.3 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
11.1 fps
170%
HD Graphics 505:
18.9 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
40.1 fps
118%
HD Graphics 505:
47.2 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
14.7 fps
171%
HD Graphics 505:
25.2 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
54.5 fps
128%
HD Graphics 505:
69.7 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
14.1 fps
113%
HD Graphics 505:
15.9 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
119 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
27.2 fps
100%
HD Graphics 500:
46 fps
135%
HD Graphics 505:
62.3 fps
Average Gaming Intel HD Graphics 500 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Intel HD Graphics 505 → 139% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 153%
Average Gaming Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 → 420% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 431%
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Overwatch 60.5 53.3 42.9 23.1 Doom Rise of the Tomb Raider 30.2 18.2 12.2 8.9 Fallout 4 Metal Gear Solid V 59.9 58.6 23 14.9 Dota 2 Reborn 59.8 37.2 15.3 14 Batman: Arkham Knight Thief 43.8 30.1 25 12.4 Metro: Last Light 63.7 50.8 28.5 14.3 BioShock Infinite 101.3 57.9 51 14.9 StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm 380.6 127.1 73.6 36.2 Guild Wars 2 115.8 38.7 16.7 Sleeping Dogs 107.2 81.2 37.3 8.8 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 4 5 1 1 6 1 1 5 4 1 9 1
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 25. 01:49:16
#0 checking url part for id 7543 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 7542 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 7236 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 05:40:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.127s ... 0.129s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.129s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.129s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7543 +0.06s ... 0.188s
#9 got single benchmarks 7543 +0.107s ... 0.295s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7542 +0.016s ... 0.311s
#11 got single benchmarks 7542 +0.073s ... 0.384s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 7236 +0.02s ... 0.404s
#13 got single benchmarks 7236 +0.01s ... 0.414s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.414s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.36s ... 0.774s
#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.774s
#17 Got 298 rows for game benchmarks. +0.047s ... 0.821s
#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.821s
#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.059s ... 0.879s
#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.174s ... 1.053s
#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 1.053s
#22 return log +0.003s ... 1.057s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)