ERROR: No GPU found with the ID:900

getGPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German GPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 vs vs Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950
Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 vs vs Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900

► remove from comparison Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900

The Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 900 (also known as GMA 900) is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip on the Mobile Intel 915GM chipset for Intel processors. It does not support hardware T&L (Transform & Lightning) calculations (which is required for some games).

It supports DirectX 9.0 with Shader Model 2.0 (Vertex Shader are calculated in Software - by the CPU) and OpenGL 1.4. Furthermore, the chip is able to accelerate the decoding of MPEG2 videos and supports Motion Compensation.

The GMA 900 can not be described as a graphics card that is sufficient for gamers. Still Intel published a list  of games that will run (not needingly beautiful) on the notebook. Some old 3D games and especially 2D games should run without problems. The advantage of integrated graphics cards, is that they have a low power consumtion and therefore save battery life. Furthermore, the laptop may stay cooler and more silent than laptops with dedicated graphics cards. For office programs and surfing the performance is more than sufficient.

Currently there are no drivers that support Aero Glass for Windows Vista.

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950

► remove from comparison Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950

The Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 (also known as Intel GMA 950) is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip on the Mobile Intel 945Gx chipset for Intel processors. It is a faster clocked version of the GMA 900 and does not support hardware T&L (Transform & Lightning) calculations (which is required for some games). Compared to the GMA 900 it now supports Shader Model 3.0 (instead of 2.0) and can decode 2 HD Streams simultaneously.

It supports DirectX 9.0 with Shader Model 3.0 (Vertex Shader are calculated in Software - by the CPU) and OpenGL 1.4. Furthermore, the chip is able to accelerate the decoding of MPEG2 videos and supports Motion Compensation (2 HD Streams simultaneously). Modern HD videos in MPEG 4 or VC-1 can not be decoded with the graphics card. 

The GMA 950 is integrated in the following chipsets with different rendering clock rates (that affect the 3D performance):

  • 945GU: 133 MHz (Lakeport for Intel A100 and A110)
  • 945GSE: 166 MHz (for Atom)
  • 945GMS: 166 MHz / 250 MHz (1.05V)
  • 940GML 166 MHz / 200 MHz (1.05V) - Celeron M (ULV)
  • 943GML: 200 MHz
  • 945GM: 250 MHz (Calistoga)
  • 945G, 945GC, 945GZ: 400 MHz (Lakeport)

Using the GMABooster tool, slower variants can be clocked to 400 MHz to increase the 3D performance (use at your own risk, not supported by Intel!).

The GMA 950 can not be described as a graphics card that is sufficient for gamers. Still Intel published a list  of games that will run (not needingly beautiful) on the notebook (list is for the GMA 900). Some old 3D games and especially 2D games should run without problems. The advantage of integrated graphics cards, is that they have a low power consumtion and therefore save battery life. Furthermore, the laptop may stay cooler and more silent than laptops with dedicated graphics cards. For office programs and surfing the performance is more than sufficient.

The newest drivers support Windows Vista with Aero Glass effects and according to some of our readers it should run fluently.

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950
GMA Series
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD 10 @ 0.64 GHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD 10 @ 0.53 GHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M 10 @ 0.4 GHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 8 @ 0.5 GHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 4/0 cores @ 0.25 GHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 4/0 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 4 @ 0.4 GHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 4 @ 0.2 GHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD 10 @ 0.64 GHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD 10 @ 0.53 GHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M 10 @ 0.4 GHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 8 @ 0.5 GHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 4/0 cores @ 0.25 GHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 4/0 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 4 @ 0.4 GHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 4 @ 0.2 GHz
CodenameGMA 900GMA 950
ArchitectureGen. 3Gen. 3
Pipelines4 / 0 Pixel- / Vertexshader4 / 0 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed400 MHz250 MHz
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 2.0DirectX 9c, Shader 2.0
technology130 nm130 nm
FeaturesNo Hardware Transform and Lightning Support (T&L), MPEG2 acceleration, Motion CompensationNo Hardware Transform & Lightning (T&L), Hardware Motion Compensation, Hardware MPEG2 acceleration
Date of Announcement01.03.2005 01.03.2005
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.intel.comwww.intel.com
Power Consumption7 Watt
InformationWindows Vista Premium Ready

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 1726     avg: 3330     median: 4000 (4%)     max: 4264 Points
min: 653     avg: 3857     median: 3009 (3%)     max: 6992 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 289     avg: 736     median: 877.5 (0%)     max: 900 Points
min: 165     avg: 932     median: 751 (0%)     max: 1626 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 200     avg: 234     median: 223 (0%)     max: 279 Points
min: 0     avg: 407.3     median: 424 (0%)     max: 664 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900
3DMark 06
min: 54     avg: 57     median: 57 (0%)     max: 60 Points
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950
min: 86     avg: 140.1     median: 134 (0%)     max: 223 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950
3DMark 06
min: 107     avg: 121.7     median: 107 (0%)     max: 151 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950
3DMark 06
min: 91     avg: 113     median: 113 (0%)     max: 135 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 + Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950
3DMark 06
min: 73     avg: 132.6     median: 122.5 (0%)     max: 243 Points
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
0.8 Points (2%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
0.4 Points (1%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
1.4 Points (1%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
0.5 Points (1%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
0.8 Points (1%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
0.1 Points (0%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
2.6 Points (38%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
3.5 Points (51%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
149 Points (0%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950
min: 30     avg: 274.5     median: 274 (0%)     max: 444 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
low 640x480
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950:
2  fps
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950:
2  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950:
19 25 70 ~ 38 fps
med. 800x600
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950:
2 3 5 ~ 3 fps
high 1024x768
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950:
1 1 2 ~ 1 fps
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950:
14 16.3 ~ 15 fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900:
2.8  fps
143%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950:
2.9 5.5 ~ 4 fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900:
32.1  fps
274%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950:
6.1 24.1 57.2 58.2 59 59.8 60.1 72.6 89.1 99.5 108.1 115.5 117.7 118.3 119.6 120.1 123.5 128 130.1 ~ 88 fps

Average Gaming Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 → 209%

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Left 4 Dead2
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark2
F.E.A.R.3831
World of Warcraft15
Doom 34
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo88
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3
1

1


2

1









Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Doom 32.8
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo32.1
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1






1










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 24. 09:32:41

#0 checking url part for id 58 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 900 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 49 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 05:40:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.14s ... 0.141s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.141s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.141s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 58 +0.037s ... 0.178s

#9 got single benchmarks 58 +0.102s ... 0.279s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 900 +0.002s ... 0.281s

#11 got single benchmarks 900 +0s ... 0.281s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 49 +0.002s ... 0.283s

#13 got single benchmarks 49 +0.392s ... 0.675s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.675s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.281s ... 0.956s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.956s

#17 Got 36 rows for game benchmarks. +0.02s ... 0.976s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.976s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.978s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.015s ... 0.993s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.993s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.995s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)