ERROR: No GPU found with the ID:500

getGPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German GPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected)

ERROR: No GPU found with the ID:500

getGPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German GPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 vs vs Vivante GC800
Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 vs vs Vivante GC800

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500

► remove from comparison Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500

The Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 500 (also called GMA 500) is a graphics card for embedded products (e.g. MIDs), netbooks and other small mobile devices. It is usually paired with an Intel Atom CPU and designed for video playback tasks (even HD content). The integrated video decoder is able to accelerate MPEG-2, VC-1, and AVC HD videos.

The graphics core is based on a licensed PowerVR SGX core (Power VR SGX535 as in the Apple A4) and is clocked with 100 (UL11L) or 200 MHz (US15L, US15W chipset). The GMA 500 is compatible with DirectX 10.1 and features 4 unified shaders. Still the performance wont be sufficient for playing 3D games.

The chipsets that integrate the GMA 500 (UL11L, US15L, and US15W) support

GMA 500 chipset comparison
UL11LUS15LUS15W
Core Speed100200200 MHz
Max RAM512 MB1024 MB1024 MB
max Displays122
PCIe Slots122

Vivante GC800

► remove from comparison

The Vivante GC800 is an integrated graphics card for ARM based (e.g. Rockchip RK291x) and MIPS based (e.g. Actions ATM701x) SoCs. It offers a single VEC-4 (or in other words four VEC-1) unified shaders and supports OpenGL ES 2.0 (optional ES 3.0), OpenGL 2.0, OpenVG 1.1, DirectX 9_3 (optional) and OpenCL 1.2 (optional). The clock rate can be choosen between 315 and 575 MHz in 40nm designs and up to 800 MHz in 28nm designs.

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500Vivante GC800
Series
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD 10 @ 0.64 GHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD 10 @ 0.53 GHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M 10 @ 0.4 GHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 8 @ 0.5 GHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 4/0 cores @ 0.25 GHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 900 4/0 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 4 @ 0.4 GHz
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 4 @ 0.2 GHz
Vivante GC1000+ Dual-Core 2 @ 0.6 GHz
GC800 1 @ 0.32 - 0.58 GHz
Extreme Graphics 2 @ 0.13 GHz
PXP
unknown
CodenameGMA 500
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX5
Pipelines4 - unified1 - unified
Core Speed200 MHz315 - 575 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1OpenGL ES 2.0
technology130 nm28 nm
Features
OpenGL 2.0, PowerVR SGX Kern, Screen Tiling, Internal True Color Processing, Zero overhead AA, 32 Bit floating-point operations.
Date of Announcement01.11.2008 01.01.2012
Link to Manufacturer Pagedownload.intel.comwww.vivantecorp.com
CPU in GC800GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Rockchip RK29181 x 1000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
3DMark 06
min: 72     avg: 75.5     median: 75.5 (0%)     max: 79 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
3DMark 06
68 Points (0%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 + Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
3DMark 06
88 Points (0%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
min: 2.3     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (30%)     max: 2.4 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 2.9     avg: 4.2     median: 4.5 (57%)     max: 4.5 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
min: 2.4     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (40%)     max: 3 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
min: 4.5     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (76%)     max: 5.9 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
100%
1 GC800 +
1899 Points (66%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Score
100%
1 GC800 +
3546 Points (31%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 GPU
100%
1 GC800 +
4199 Points (44%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
100%
1 GC800 +
29.1 fps (48%)
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
100%
1 GC800 +
59.8 fps (89%)
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
100%
1 GC800 +
min: 1254     avg: 1911     median: 1259 (27%)     max: 3219 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks Vivante GC800 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500:
16  fps
med. 800x600
100%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500:
2  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500:
1  fps

Average Gaming Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 → 100%

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F.E.A.R.1621
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1


1


1











For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 16. 23:10:45

#0 checking url part for id 1058 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 500 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 500 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 3156 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:39:00 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#6 composed specs +0.096s ... 0.097s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.097s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.097s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1058 +0.031s ... 0.128s

#10 got single benchmarks 1058 +0.041s ... 0.168s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 500 +0.002s ... 0.17s

#12 got single benchmarks 500 +0s ... 0.17s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 3156 +0.001s ... 0.171s

#14 got single benchmarks 3156 +0.007s ... 0.178s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.178s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.147s ... 0.325s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.326s

#18 Got 3 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.329s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.329s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.33s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.333s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.333s

#23 return log +0.002s ... 0.334s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)