Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200

NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra

The mobile top video card of the 6000 series brought more desktop-comparable performance in notebooks. Nevertheless, it also has a considerable current consumption and heat development.
It is a higher clocked Geforce Go 6800 (not more pipelines!) and therefore faster and hotter, too. It was replaced by 7800 GTX and 7900 GTX.

NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200

The NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200 / 6250 / 6200 TE is the smallest version of the series 6 with own memory. It offers few own memory and fills the rest with main memory (called TurboCache). The video performance is sufficient only for not demanding or elder games, though many features are supported.

The heat development and the current consumption are low (but higher than with integrated graphics). For gamers too weak and for a office notebook too hungry for energy? In reality GeForce Go 6200 is somewhere between it.

The GeForce Go 6250 is a somewhat higher clocked version of the 6200.

The PureVideo functions enable the 6200 to accelerate the playback of MPEG videos (not in HD). > Comparison Table

NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 UltraNVIDIA GeForce Go 6200
GeForce Go 6000 Series
GeForce Go 6800 Ultra 12/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
GeForce Go 6800 compare 12/5 cores @ 0.3 GHz128 / 256 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6600 compare 8/4 cores @ 0.38 GHz128 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6400 compare 4/3 cores @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
GeForce Go 6250 compare 4/3 cores @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
GeForce Go 6200 4/3 cores @ 0.3 GHz64 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6150 compare 2/1 cores @ 0.43 GHz
GeForce Go 6100 compare 2/1 cores @ 0.43 GHz
GeForce Go 6800 Ultra 12/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
GeForce Go 6800 compare 12/5 cores @ 0.3 GHz128 / 256 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6600 compare 8/4 cores @ 0.38 GHz128 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6400 compare 4/3 cores @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
GeForce Go 6250 compare 4/3 cores @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
GeForce Go 6200 4/3 cores @ 0.3 GHz64 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6150 compare 2/1 cores @ 0.43 GHz
GeForce Go 6100 compare 2/1 cores @ 0.43 GHz
CodenameNV41MNV44MV
Pipelines12 / 5 Pixel- / Vertexshader4 / 3 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed450 MHz300 MHz
Memory Speed600 MHz300 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3DDR
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB32 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0
Power Consumption89 Watt10 Watt
Transistors222 Million146 Million
technology130 nm110 nm
Features90nmUltraShadow II, Intellisample 3.0, PowerMizer 5.0, OpenGL 2
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement25.02.2005 01.02.2006
Information130nm, 222 Millionen Transistoren110nm, 146 Millionen Transistoren, PCI-E
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/page/go_6800.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.de/page/go_6200.html

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
23800 Points (25%)
9000 Points (9%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
11000 Points (6%)
2500 Points (1%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
5000 Points (7%)
900 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
3DMark 06
2500 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200 → 26% n=3

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 29. 03:13:25

#0 checking url part for id 10 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 42 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:25:51 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.058s ... 0.059s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.061s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#12 composed specs +0s ... 0.061s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.061s

#14 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.061s

#15 getting avg benchmarks for device 10 +0.029s ... 0.09s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.091s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.091s

#19 got single benchmarks 10 +0.005s ... 0.096s

#20 getting avg benchmarks for device 42 +0s ... 0.096s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.097s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.097s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.098s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.099s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.1s

#27 got single benchmarks 42 +0.004s ... 0.104s

#28 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.104s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.104s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.105s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.106s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.106s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.106s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.106s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.107s

#36 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.107s

#37 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.107s

#38 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.108s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.109s

#40 return log +0.002s ... 0.111s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)