Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI is a high-end laptop graphics solution based on two GTX 485M graphics cards. With SLI, each card usually renders a single frame (AFR mode). Therefore, it may suffer from micro stuttering in low fps ranges of 30fps. This happens because of different timespans between two frames (e.g. irregular delays between sequential frames).

The GeForce GTX485M SLI supports the same features as a single GTX 485M card. Therefore, it supports DirectX 11 and is produced in a 40nm fabrication process at TSMC. 

Unlike the GeForce GTX 480M, the 485M is no longer based on a trimmed down GF100 core, but on the GF104 core instead. The latter has been designed for the consumer sector and has 384 cores maximum if completely enabled. More information on the GF104 core can be found on the GTX 485M page.  

The performance of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 485M SLI is clearly better than the GTX 480M SLI and is therefore the fastest graphics solution for laptops as of early 2011. It allows the user to play all current games in high resolutions and detail settings with Antialiasing activated. Only Metro 2033 and Crysis may stutter with high Antialiasing and maximum details. Compared to a single GTX 485M, the performance from the SLI combination should be about 40% higher on average (with high details and Antialiasing). Compared to Crossfire solutions by AMD, the Nvdia SLI drivers have the advantage as of this writing.

As the GeForce 300M series, the GeForce GTX 485M supports PureVideo HD with VideoProcessor 4 (VP4 with Feature Set C). This means that the GPU is able to fully decode HD videos in H.254, VC-1, MPEG-2, and MPEG-4 ASP. Using Flash 10.1, the graphics card can also accelerate Flash videos.

What's new in the GF104 chips compared to the GF100 (480M) is the support for Bitstream transfer of HD Audio (Blu-Ray) via HDMI. Similar to the HD 5850, the GTX 485M can transmit Dolby True HD and DTS-HD via Bitstream to compatible receivers without quality loss.

The rendering cores of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 485M can be used for general calculations using CUDA or DirectCompute. In other words, the encoding for HD videos can be done significantly faster by using the shader cores of the GPUs instead of using modern CPUs. PhysX is also supported by the mobile Fermi to calculate physics effects in supported games. Furthermore, a single GTX485M can be used to calculate PhysX while the other card can render frames in the SLI setup.

Compared to desktop GPUs, the Geforce GTX 485M SLI is most similar to two Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 cards running in an SLI configuration.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI is a high-end graphics solution for laptops based on two GTX 480M graphics cards in SLI mode. Each card usually renders a single frame in an alternating manner. Therefore, it may suffer from micro stuttering in low fps ranges of 30fps. This happens because of different timespans between two frames (e.g. Irregular delays between sequential frames).

The GeForce GTX480M SLI supports the same features as a single GTX 480M card. A single card is based on the Fermi architecture. Therefore, it supports DirectX 11 and is produced in 40nm at TSMC. Featuring 352 cores, the GTX480M is similar to the desktop GTX 465 but features a lower clock rate. The GeForce GTX 480M is combined with 2 GB of fast GDDR5 graphics memory (dedicated) and the overall performance should be superior to the Mobility Radeon HD 5870.

The GF100 aka. Fermi chip was redesigned from scratch and features 3 billion transistors (with all 512 shaders). Compared to the desktop Radeon HD 5870 with 2.13 billion transistors or the Mobility Radeon HD 5870 (RV870) with 1.04 billion transistors, the GTX480M chipset is quite large.

The mobile Fermi chip is stripped down to 352 shader cores (1-dimensional) with 32 ROPs and 44 Texture Units. The memory bus is 256 bit wide, but due to the fast GDDR5 memory, this should not be a bottleneck. The power consumption is specified with 100 Watt TDP including the MXM board and the 2 GB GDDR5. AMD usually specifies the TDP of the chip alone, therefore this value is not directly comparable. Still, the GTX 480M is only suited for very large DTR laptops with a good cooling system. Originally, only Clevo sold 17" (D901F) and 18" (X8100) barebone systems.

The fast performance of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M SLI is marginally better than two ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 in Crossfire Mode (CF), partly because of the superior driver support from Nvidia.  This means the GTX 480M SLI was the fastest graphics solution for laptops at the time of arrival (2010-06). It allows the user to play all current games in high resolutions and detail settings with Antialiasing activated. Only Metro 2033 and Crysis have to run at lower settings (see below).

Still, in some games the performance gain from SLI may be very small or sometimes a single card may be even a bit faster (due to no SLI support and overhead). You can still disable SLI through the drivers in this case. In our gaming tests, a single 480M was about 16% (Starcraft 2) to 48% (Far Cry 2) slower than the SLI combination. Otherwise, most modern games run about 40% slower on the single card compared to the SLI setup. (see expandable gaming charts below). Due to the fast tessellation unit, upcoming DirectX 11 games may have an advantage over the AMD 5000 series.

Similar to the GeForce 300M series, the GeForce GTX 480M supports PureVideo HD with VideoProcessor 4 (VP4 with Feature Set C). As a result, the GPU is able to fully decode HD videos in H.254, VC-1, MPEG-2, and MPEG-4 ASP. By using Flash 10.1 or later, the graphics card can also accelerate Flash videos, thus taking workload off of the CPU.

The rendering cores of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M can be used for general calculations by means of CUDA or DirectCompute. E.g., the encoding for HD videos can be done significantly faster by using the shader cores of the GPUs rather than using most modern CPUs. PhysX is also supported by the mobile Fermi to calculate physics effects in supported games. Furthermore, a single GTX480M can be used to calculate PhysX while the other card renders the game.

Compared to desktop GPUs, the Geforce GTX 480M is comparable to an underclocked Nvidia GeForce GTX 465 SLI combination (607/1200 clock speed).

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLINVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
GeForce GTX 400M Series
GeForce GTX 485M SLI 768 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1500 MHz
GeForce GTX 470M SLI compare 576 @ 0.54 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 480M SLI 704 @ 0.43 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
GeForce GTX 460M SLI compare 384 @ 0.68 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 485M compare 384 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1500 MHz
GeForce GTX 470M compare 288 @ 0.54 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 480M compare 352 @ 0.43 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
GeForce GTX 460M compare 192 @ 0.68 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 485M SLI 768 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1500 MHz
GeForce GTX 470M SLI compare 576 @ 0.54 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 480M SLI 704 @ 0.43 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
GeForce GTX 460M SLI compare 384 @ 0.68 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 485M compare 384 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1500 MHz
GeForce GTX 470M compare 288 @ 0.54 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 480M compare 352 @ 0.43 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
GeForce GTX 460M compare 192 @ 0.68 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
CodenameN11E-GTX-A1N11E-GTX-A3
ArchitectureFermiFermi
Pipelines768 - unified704 - unified
Core Speed575 MHz425 MHz
Shader Speed1150 MHz850 MHz
Memory Speed1500 MHz1200 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory2x2048 MB4 GB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Power Consumption100 Watt100 Watt
technology40 nm40 nm
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement06.01.2011 25.05.2010
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.comwww.nvidia.com
Transistors6 Billion

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
5468 Points (8%)
4383 Points (6%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
5334 Points (5%)
4229 Points (4%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 24816     avg: 24830     median: 24830 (7%)     max: 24844 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
min: 15839     avg: 16500     median: 16499.5 (5%)     max: 17160 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 23082     avg: 23092     median: 23092 (13%)     max: 23102 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
14890 Points (8%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
87591 Points (46%)
75704 Points (40%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
29690 Points (33%)
28423 Points (31%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI
3DMark 06
min: 23286     avg: 23415     median: 23415 (31%)     max: 23544 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
20144 Points (27%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
3DMark 06
21792 Points (29%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
78.5 fps (15%)
58.8 fps (11%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
2.2 fps (1%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
0.9 fps (1%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
0.7 fps (0%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
0.6 fps (0%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
6.4 fps (5%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
5.1 fps (4%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
1.4 fps (2%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
1.1 fps (1%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
7.4 fps (6%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
4.8 fps (4%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
10.2 fps (11%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
9.9 fps (11%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
22.6 fps (11%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
8.7 fps (4%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
5.2 fps (3%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
4 fps (2%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
7.5 Points (95%)
7.8 Points (99%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
7.5 Points (95%)
7.8 Points (99%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
5658 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
5178 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
44.8 fps (16%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
37.7 fps (13%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI → 79% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
167  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
125.1  fps
high 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
128.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
119  fps
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
638  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
426.6  fps
high 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
307.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
199.2  fps
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
145.3  fps
86%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
124.7  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
139.5  fps
81%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
113.2  fps
high 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
132.4  fps
80%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
105.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
102.2  fps
74%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
75.8  fps
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
323.8  fps
86%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
279.6  fps
med. 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
105.3  fps
71%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
74.9  fps
high 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
94.8  fps
68%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
64.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
65.9  fps
64%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
42.5  fps
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
149.6  fps
90%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
134.4  fps
med. 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
141  fps
76%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
106.8  fps
high 1600x900
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
89.4  fps
68%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
61.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
31.4  fps
74%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
23.1  fps
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
198.2  fps
76%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
151.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
192.4  fps
70%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
134.4  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
168.6  fps
66%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
110.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
96.8  fps
67%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
64.7  fps
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
361.4  fps
77%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
277.5  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
212.5  fps
70%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
148  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
190.1  fps
68%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
129.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
142  fps
64%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
90.3  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
189.2  fps
79%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
148.9  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
157.5  fps
80%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
125.7  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
142.7  fps
73%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
104.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
109.1  fps
65%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
70.9  fps
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
202.6  fps
78%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
157.8  fps
high 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
143.7  fps
69%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
98.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
97.5  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
138.6  fps
82%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
113.8  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
139  fps
83%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
115.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
126  fps
74%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
93  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
234.9  fps
80%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
188.2  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
197.6  fps
80%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
157.5  fps
high 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
177.2  fps
74%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
130.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
114.3  fps
71%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
81.3  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
228.2  fps
76%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
173  fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
138.9  fps
75%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
103.9  fps
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
283.8  fps
84%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
238.3  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
202.4  fps
79%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
160.2  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
195.9  fps
79%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
154.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
154.3  fps
70%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
108.7  fps
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
low 640x480
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
244.2  fps
high 1024x768
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
191.1  fps
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
low 640x480
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
199.7  fps
high 1024x768
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
134  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
88.1  fps
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
357.4  fps
med. 1024x768
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
244  fps
high 1280x1024
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
172.1  fps
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
158.2  fps
84%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
132.1  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
92.8  fps
90%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
83.4  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
76.7  fps
90%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
68.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
43.3  fps
71%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
30.9  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
209.5  fps
81%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
170.3  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
96.7  fps
93%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
89.5  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
78.6  fps
93%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
72.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 485M SLI:
41.4  fps
73%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
30.1  fps
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
152.2  fps
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
244.9  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLI → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI → 77%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 72%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M SLIlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Call of Duty: Black Ops167125.1128.4119
Fifa 11638426.6307.3199.2
Mafia 2145.3139.5132.4102.2
StarCraft 2323.8105.394.865.9
Metro 2033149.614189.431.4
Battlefield: Bad Company 2198.2192.4168.696.8
CoD Modern Warfare 2361.4212.5190.1142
Risen189.2157.5142.7109.1
Resident Evil 5202.6143.7
Need for Speed Shift138.6139126
Colin McRae: DIRT 2234.9197.6177.2114.3
Anno 1404228.2138.9
F.E.A.R. 2283.8202.4195.9154.3
Crysis - GPU Benchmark158.292.876.743.3
Crysis - CPU Benchmark209.596.778.641.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps



14


3
10


4
10

3
6
5






NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLIlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Mafia 2124.7113.2105.875.8
StarCraft 2279.674.964.642.5
Metro 2033134.4106.861.123.1
Battlefield: Bad Company 2151.6134.4110.664.7
CoD Modern Warfare 2277.5148129.190.3
Risen148.9125.7104.670.9
Resident Evil 5157.898.797.5
Need for Speed Shift113.8115.993
Colin McRae: DIRT 2188.2157.5130.781.3
Anno 1404173103.9
F.E.A.R. 2238.3160.2154.7108.7
Left 4 Dead244.2191.1
Far Cry 2199.713488.1
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare357.4244172.1
Crysis - GPU Benchmark132.183.468.830.9
Crysis - CPU Benchmark170.389.572.830.1
Call of Juarez Benchmark152.2
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark244.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps



15


6
6


9
8
1
3
10






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 16:17:25

#0 checking url part for id 2528 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1857 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:39:00 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.1s ... 0.101s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.101s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.101s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 2528 +0.023s ... 0.124s

#8 got single benchmarks 2528 +0.007s ... 0.131s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1857 +0.001s ... 0.132s

#10 got single benchmarks 1857 +0.008s ... 0.14s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.14s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.185s ... 0.325s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.325s

#14 Got 113 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.333s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.333s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.011s ... 0.343s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.044s ... 0.387s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.387s

#19 return log +0.036s ... 0.423s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)