Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI is a high-end graphics solution for laptops based on two GeForce GTX 470M graphic cards in SLI mode. Each card usually renders a single frame in an alternating manner. Therefore, it may suffer from micro stuttering in low fps ranges of 30fps. This happens because of different timespans between two frames (e.g. Irregular delays between sequential frames). Each single GTX 470M is based on the GF104 core and therefore supports DirectX1 11 and OpenGL 4.0.

GF104 architecture

The GF104 core of the GTX 470M is related to the GF100 core of the GeFore GTX 480M that offers 384 shaders and a 256 Bit memory bus for GDDR5. The GTX 470M, however, offers only 288 cores of the 384 and a 192 Bit memory bus. The architecture of the GF104 is not comparable to the old GT215 (e.g., GeForce GTS 350M) or G92b (e.g., GeForce GTX 285M) cores.  

Unlike the GF100, the smaller GF104, GF106, and GF108 cores were shortened and considerably modified. In contrast to the GF100, which was designed for professional applications, these chips target the consumer market. They feature more shaders (3x16 instead of 2x16), more texture units (8 instead of 4) and SFUs per streaming multi-processor (SM). As there are still only 2 warp schedulers (versus 3 shader groups), Nvidia now uses superscalar execution to use the higher amount of shaders per SM more efficiently. In theory, the shaders can therefore be utilized more efficiently and the performance per core is improved. 

However, in worst case scenarios the performance can also be worse than that of the GF100 (and its predecessors). The ECC memory protection, which is important for professional applications, was completely omitted and the FP64 hardware was shortened (only 1/3 of the shader are FP64-capable and therefore only 1/12 of the performance of the FP32). Because of these cutbacks, the size of the SM  grew only by 25% despite the higher number of shaders and larger warp schedulers with superscalar dispatch capabilities. Due to the different shader architectures and the higher clock rate of the shader domain, the core count can not be directly compared to AMD cores of the Radeon 5000 series (e.g. HD 5850).

Detailed information on the GF104 architecture (and by extension also the GF106 and GF108) can be found in the desktop GTX 460 article by Anandtech.

Performance

The performance of the GTX 470M SLI combination should be similar to the GTX 480M SLI due to the high-clocked GTX470M cards. Generally, the SLI gain depends on the used application/game and the driver support. Currently, the SLI driver support from Nvidia is better than the Crossfire support from AMD, leading to higher gains. About 30% more performance is gained on average compared to a single GTX 470M (in high resolutions and with Anti-Aliasing). Therefore, all games from 2010 except Metro 2033 should be playable in the highest detail settings. Metro 2033 only ran with 23 fps in our tests with a GTX 480M SLI system and should therefore score similar on the GTX 470M SLI combination.

Features

A novelty of the GF104/106/108 chips is the support of Bitstream HD Audio (Blu-Ray) output via HDMI. Similar to the Radeon HD 5850, the GTX 470M can transfer Dolby True HD and DTS-HD bitstream without quality loss to a HiFi receiver.

The GTX470M offers the PureVideo HD technology for video decoding. The included Video Processor 4 (VP4) supports feature set C and therefore the GPU is able to fully decode MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4 Part 2 (MPEG-4 ASP - e.g., DivX or Xvid), VC-1/WMV9, and H.264 (VLD, IDCT, Motion Compensation, and Deblocking). The X500 tester was able to decode the VC-1 encoded Elephants Dream video with about 3-6% CPU load (according to the task manager). The H.264-encoded Big Buck Bunny video was played back with 1-3% CPU load (both 1080p videos).

Furthermore, the GPU is able to decode two 1080p streams simultaneously (e.g. for Blu-Ray Picture-in-Picture).

Through CUDA, OpenCL and DirectCompute 2.1 support, the GeForce GTX 470M can assist in general calculations. For example, the stream processor can  encode videos considerably faster than certain high-end CPUs. Furthermore, physics calculations can be done by the GPU using PhysX (e.g. supported by Mafia 2 or Metro 2033). SLI systems can also dedicate a single card for PhysX calculations.

According to Nvidia, support for 3D Vision on the GTX graphics cards is also new. It enables the laptop to send 3D contents (3D games, 3D Web Streaming, 3D photos, 3D Blu-Rays) to a built-in 3D enabled screen or an external 3D TV (only if supported by the laptop manufacturer).

Unofficially, the power consumption of the GeForce GTX 470M should be about 75 Watt (TDP including the MXM board and memory), which is about the level of the Mobility Radeon HD 5870. Therefore, the SLI system needs 2x75 Watt and therefore a lot less than the GTX 480M SLI with 2x100W. Without load, the chip is clocked at 50/100 MHz (chip/shader) in 2D respectively 200/400 in 3D mode to save power.

Compared to desktop graphics cards, the GTX 470M SLI combination is most similar in performance to a GTS 450 SLI combo, as the desktop GTX 470 is significantly faster.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI is a high-end graphics solution for laptops based on two GTX 480M graphics cards in SLI mode. Each card usually renders a single frame in an alternating manner. Therefore, it may suffer from micro stuttering in low fps ranges of 30fps. This happens because of different timespans between two frames (e.g. Irregular delays between sequential frames).

The GeForce GTX480M SLI supports the same features as a single GTX 480M card. A single card is based on the Fermi architecture. Therefore, it supports DirectX 11 and is produced in 40nm at TSMC. Featuring 352 cores, the GTX480M is similar to the desktop GTX 465 but features a lower clock rate. The GeForce GTX 480M is combined with 2 GB of fast GDDR5 graphics memory (dedicated) and the overall performance should be superior to the Mobility Radeon HD 5870.

The GF100 aka. Fermi chip was redesigned from scratch and features 3 billion transistors (with all 512 shaders). Compared to the desktop Radeon HD 5870 with 2.13 billion transistors or the Mobility Radeon HD 5870 (RV870) with 1.04 billion transistors, the GTX480M chipset is quite large.

The mobile Fermi chip is stripped down to 352 shader cores (1-dimensional) with 32 ROPs and 44 Texture Units. The memory bus is 256 bit wide, but due to the fast GDDR5 memory, this should not be a bottleneck. The power consumption is specified with 100 Watt TDP including the MXM board and the 2 GB GDDR5. AMD usually specifies the TDP of the chip alone, therefore this value is not directly comparable. Still, the GTX 480M is only suited for very large DTR laptops with a good cooling system. Originally, only Clevo sold 17" (D901F) and 18" (X8100) barebone systems.

The fast performance of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M SLI is marginally better than two ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 in Crossfire Mode (CF), partly because of the superior driver support from Nvidia.  This means the GTX 480M SLI was the fastest graphics solution for laptops at the time of arrival (2010-06). It allows the user to play all current games in high resolutions and detail settings with Antialiasing activated. Only Metro 2033 and Crysis have to run at lower settings (see below).

Still, in some games the performance gain from SLI may be very small or sometimes a single card may be even a bit faster (due to no SLI support and overhead). You can still disable SLI through the drivers in this case. In our gaming tests, a single 480M was about 16% (Starcraft 2) to 48% (Far Cry 2) slower than the SLI combination. Otherwise, most modern games run about 40% slower on the single card compared to the SLI setup. (see expandable gaming charts below). Due to the fast tessellation unit, upcoming DirectX 11 games may have an advantage over the AMD 5000 series.

Similar to the GeForce 300M series, the GeForce GTX 480M supports PureVideo HD with VideoProcessor 4 (VP4 with Feature Set C). As a result, the GPU is able to fully decode HD videos in H.254, VC-1, MPEG-2, and MPEG-4 ASP. By using Flash 10.1 or later, the graphics card can also accelerate Flash videos, thus taking workload off of the CPU.

The rendering cores of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 480M can be used for general calculations by means of CUDA or DirectCompute. E.g., the encoding for HD videos can be done significantly faster by using the shader cores of the GPUs rather than using most modern CPUs. PhysX is also supported by the mobile Fermi to calculate physics effects in supported games. Furthermore, a single GTX480M can be used to calculate PhysX while the other card renders the game.

Compared to desktop GPUs, the Geforce GTX 480M is comparable to an underclocked Nvidia GeForce GTX 465 SLI combination (607/1200 clock speed).

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M

► remove from comparison

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 485M is the fastest graphics card for laptops at the time of announcement (Q1 2011). It is based on the GF104 chip and offers all 384 shader cores and the full 256 Bit memory bus. Due to the high clock rate of 575 MHz, it is significantly faster than the old GeForce GTX 480M of which it replaces. It also supports DirectX 11 and OpenGL 4.0.

Other than the GeForce GTX 480M, the 485M is no longer based on a trimmed down GF100 chip, but on the related GF104 instead. The GF104 is designed for the consumer sector and has a total of 384 cores. A number of cores may be disabled, for example the 470M with only 288 active cores.

The technology of the GF104 differs quite a bit from the GF100 chip (which was actually designed for professional use). The GF104 has more shaders (3x16 vs. 2x16), texture units (8 vs. 4) and SFUs (Special-Funciton-Units) per Streaming-Multiprocessors (SM). Nvidia now uses the superscalar architecture as there are still only two warp schedulers supporting three shader blocks. In theory, this helps to utilize the shaders more efficiently and increases the performance per core.

However, in the worst case, the performance can drop below the GF100 architecture (and its predecessors). The ECC memory protection, important in professional applications, was completely omitted and the FP64 was trimmed down (only 1/3 of the shaders are FP64-capable, only 1/12 of the FP32 performance). Because of these reductions in the GF104, the size of a SM increased only by 25% despite the higher number of shaders.

Note that it is not possible to directly compare the number of cores to the AMD Radeon graphics cards (e.g. HD 5870) or even to Nvidia's own predecessors (e.g., G92b), because shader architecture and clock rates are significantly different in the GF104 chip.

Performance

In our extensive test of the GeForce GTX 485M, we found that the GTX485M is significantly faster than the old GeForce GTX 480M (at the same TDP rating). The performance is on a level with two GeForce GTX 460M in SLI mode. Nearly all games are therefore playable in highest details and resolutions. Even demanding games like Mafia 2 or Battlefield Bad Company 2 can run fluently in 1080p with maximus detail settings. Detailed benchmarks can be found at the end of this page.

Features

What's new compared to the GF100 is support for Bitstream transfer of HD Audio (Blu-Ray) via HDMI in the GF104 chips. Similar to the HD 5850, the GTX 485M can transmit Dolby True HD and DTS-HD via Bitstream to compatible receivers without quality loss.

For decoding HD videos, the GTX485M supports PureVideo HD. The built-in Processor 4 (VP4) handles Feature Set C. As a result, MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4 Part 2 (MPEG-4 ASP - z.B. DivX or Xvid), VC-1/WMV9 and H.264 can be fully decoded by the graphics card (VLD, IDCT, Motion Compensation, and Deblocking). Furthermore, two streams can be simultaneously decoded in realtime, e.g. Blu-Ray Picture-in-Picture (2x1080p lt DXVAChecker). In addition, PureVideo HD indicates HDCP encoding for digital interfaces.

The shader cores (also called CUDA cores) can also be used for general computations (e.g. Video Transcoding) by using the interfaces CUDA, DirectCompute 2.1 or OpenCL. Thanks to PhysX, the 485M can also perform physics calculations.

According to Nvidia, the support for 3D Vision includes support for the recent HDMI 1.4a standard as well. If enabled by the laptop manufacturer, content such as 3D games, 3D web streaming videos, 3D pictures and 3D Blu-Ray videos can be displayed on a 3D-capable TV (via discrete 3DTV Play) or on the internal notebook 3D display.

With regards to energy demand, the GTX 485M should be on par with the GeForce GTX 480M. In other words, both graphics cards should draw about 100 Watts each when including their respective memory and MXM boards. Due to the higher performance from the 485M, the performance/power efficiency here has clearly been improved.

Compared to desktop graphics cards, the performance of the 485M should be on par with a GeForce GTX 460 768MB which features less cores but operates on higher clock rates.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLINVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLINVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
GeForce GTX 400M Series
GeForce GTX 485M SLI 768 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1500 MHz
GeForce GTX 470M SLI 576 @ 0.54 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 480M SLI 704 @ 0.43 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
GeForce GTX 460M SLI 384 @ 0.68 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 485M 384 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1500 MHz
GeForce GTX 470M 288 @ 0.54 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 480M 352 @ 0.43 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
GeForce GTX 460M 192 @ 0.68 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 485M SLI 768 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1500 MHz
GeForce GTX 470M SLI 576 @ 0.54 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 480M SLI 704 @ 0.43 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
GeForce GTX 460M SLI 384 @ 0.68 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 485M 384 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1500 MHz
GeForce GTX 470M 288 @ 0.54 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 480M 352 @ 0.43 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
GeForce GTX 460M 192 @ 0.68 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 485M SLI 768 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1500 MHz
GeForce GTX 470M SLI 576 @ 0.54 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 480M SLI 704 @ 0.43 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
GeForce GTX 460M SLI 384 @ 0.68 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 485M 384 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1500 MHz
GeForce GTX 470M 288 @ 0.54 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
GeForce GTX 480M 352 @ 0.43 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
GeForce GTX 460M 192 @ 0.68 GHz192 Bit @ 1250 MHz
CodenameN11E-GTN11E-GTX-A3N12E-GTX-A1
ArchitectureFermiFermiFermi
Pipelines576 - unified704 - unified384 - unified
Core Speed535 MHz425 MHz575 MHz
Shader Speed1070 MHz850 MHz1150 MHz
Memory Speed1250 MHz1200 MHz1500 MHz
Memory Bus Width192 Bit256 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5GDDR5
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
technology40 nm40 nm40 nm
Notebook Sizelargelargelarge
Date of Announcement01.11.2010 25.05.2010 06.01.2010
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB
Power Consumption100 Watt100 Watt
Transistors6 Billion
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
4076 Points (6%)
4383 Points (6%)
min: 2891     avg: 2942     median: 2942 (4%)     max: 2993 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
4070 Points (3%)
4229 Points (4%)
min: 2668     avg: 2709     median: 2709 (2%)     max: 2750 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
16802 Points (5%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
min: 15839     avg: 16500     median: 16499.5 (5%)     max: 17160 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
min: 13172     avg: 13450     median: 13536 (4%)     max: 13554 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 16161     avg: 16234     median: 16233.5 (9%)     max: 16306 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
14890 Points (8%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
min: 12142     avg: 12199     median: 12191.5 (7%)     max: 12270 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
69012 Points (36%)
75704 Points (40%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
25241 Points (28%)
28423 Points (31%)
min: 23218     avg: 24984     median: 24983.5 (27%)     max: 26749 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI
3DMark 06
min: 19368     avg: 20608     median: 20607.5 (27%)     max: 21847 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
20144 Points (27%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
min: 17852     avg: 19465     median: 19877.5 (26%)     max: 20251 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
3DMark 06
21792 Points (29%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
57.1 fps (11%)
58.8 fps (11%)
40.9 fps (8%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
2 fps (1%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
0.9 fps (1%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
2.1 fps (1%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
0.7 fps (0%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
0.6 fps (0%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
0.7 fps (0%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
5.6 fps (4%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
5.1 fps (4%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
6.2 fps (5%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
1.2 fps (1%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
1.1 fps (1%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
1 fps (1%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
6.1 fps (5%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
4.8 fps (4%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
7 fps (5%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
9.1 fps (10%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
9.9 fps (11%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
8.9 fps (9%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
19.1 fps (9%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
8.7 fps (4%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
22.9 fps (11%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
3.6 fps (2%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
4 fps (2%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
4.3 fps (2%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
7.8 Points (99%)
7.8 Points (99%)
6.6 Points (84%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
7.8 Points (99%)
7.8 Points (99%)
5.7 Points (72%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
5348 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
5178 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
min: 5454     avg: 5780     median: 5859.5 (4%)     max: 5947 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
40.4 fps (14%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
37.7 fps (13%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M
min: 40.88     avg: 46.7     median: 48.1 (17%)     max: 49.58 fps

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI → 92% n=19

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M → 95% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis 2

Crysis 2

2011
low 800x600
GeForce GTX 485M:
166.6  fps
med. 1024x768
GeForce GTX 485M:
117.5  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce GTX 485M:
87.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 485M:
30.3  fps
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
83.5  fps
89%
GeForce GTX 485M:
74.3  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
77.3  fps
109%
GeForce GTX 485M:
84.2  fps
high 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
77.3  fps
97%
GeForce GTX 485M:
72.7 77.5 ~ 75 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
61.4  fps
119%
GeForce GTX 485M:
71.4 74.2 ~ 73 fps
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
539  fps
84%
GeForce GTX 485M:
455  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
336  fps
97%
GeForce GTX 485M:
327  fps
high 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
242  fps
112%
GeForce GTX 485M:
271  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
151.2  fps
130%
GeForce GTX 485M:
196.9  fps
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
124.4  fps
100%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
124.7  fps
79%
GeForce GTX 485M:
97.9  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
114  fps
99%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
113.2  fps
80%
GeForce GTX 485M:
90.8  fps
high 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
103.9  fps
102%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
105.8  fps
83%
GeForce GTX 485M:
85.1 87.3 ~ 86 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
76.6  fps
99%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
75.8  fps
77%
GeForce GTX 485M:
58.3 59.2 ~ 59 fps
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
280  fps
100%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
279.6  fps
79%
GeForce GTX 485M:
220.9  fps
med. 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
83.3  fps
90%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
74.9  fps
103%
GeForce GTX 485M:
85.9  fps
high 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
73.9  fps
87%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
64.6  fps
115%
GeForce GTX 485M:
85.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
50.3  fps
84%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
42.5  fps
112%
GeForce GTX 485M:
56.5  fps
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
136  fps
99%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
134.4  fps
85%
GeForce GTX 485M:
116.2  fps
med. 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
108.1  fps
99%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
106.8  fps
75%
GeForce GTX 485M:
80.8  fps
high 1600x900
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
65.5  fps
93%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
61.1  fps
73%
GeForce GTX 485M:
48.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
23  fps
100%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
23.1  fps
70%
GeForce GTX 485M:
16.1  fps
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
152.5  fps
99%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
151.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
134.5  fps
100%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
134.4  fps
100%
GeForce GTX 485M:
134.5  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
114.9  fps
96%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
110.6  fps
88%
GeForce GTX 485M:
100.4 101.5 ~ 101 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
69.2  fps
93%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
64.7  fps
75%
GeForce GTX 485M:
49.5 53.5 ~ 52 fps
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
276.5  fps
100%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
277.5  fps
81%
GeForce GTX 485M:
223.7  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
163.9  fps
90%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
148  fps
80%
GeForce GTX 485M:
130.9  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
150.2  fps
86%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
129.1  fps
79%
GeForce GTX 485M:
118.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
104.4  fps
86%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
90.3  fps
73%
GeForce GTX 485M:
76.3  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
154  fps
97%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
148.9  fps
104%
GeForce GTX 485M:
160.3  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
127.9  fps
98%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
125.7  fps
78%
GeForce GTX 485M:
99.9  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
114.7  fps
91%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
104.6  fps
63%
GeForce GTX 485M:
72.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
81.8  fps
87%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
70.9  fps
64%
GeForce GTX 485M:
52.7  fps
Resident Evil 5

Resident Evil 5

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
155.3  fps
102%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
157.8  fps
90%
GeForce GTX 485M:
140  fps
high 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
113.8  fps
87%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
98.7  fps
85%
GeForce GTX 485M:
96.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
104.8  fps
93%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
97.5  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
low 800x600
GeForce GTX 485M:
141.9  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
114.2  fps
100%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
113.8  fps
94%
GeForce GTX 485M:
106.9  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
111.1  fps
104%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
115.9  fps
90%
GeForce GTX 485M:
100.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
102.7  fps
91%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
93  fps
69%
GeForce GTX 485M:
70.7  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
176.4  fps
107%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
188.2  fps
91%
GeForce GTX 485M:
159.9  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
164.5  fps
96%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
157.5  fps
84%
GeForce GTX 485M:
138.8  fps
high 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
148.9  fps
88%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
130.7  fps
83%
GeForce GTX 485M:
124.1 124.8 ~ 124 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
93  fps
87%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
81.3  fps
75%
GeForce GTX 485M:
69.7 70.3 ~ 70 fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
181.3  fps
95%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
173  fps
118%
GeForce GTX 485M:
214.2  fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
109  fps
95%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
103.9  fps
76%
GeForce GTX 485M:
83.3  fps
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
224.9  fps
106%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
238.3  fps
121%
GeForce GTX 485M:
271.6  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
149  fps
108%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
160.2  fps
123%
GeForce GTX 485M:
182.7  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
145.4  fps
106%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
154.7  fps
106%
GeForce GTX 485M:
153.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
110.8  fps
98%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
108.7  fps
80%
GeForce GTX 485M:
88.5  fps
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

2008
low 800x600
GeForce GTX 485M:
65.5  fps
med. 1024x768
GeForce GTX 485M:
63.9  fps
high 1280x1024
GeForce GTX 485M:
62  fps
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
low 640x480
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
234.4  fps
104%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
244.2  fps
79%
GeForce GTX 485M:
184.3  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
195.9  fps
98%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
191.1  fps
62%
GeForce GTX 485M:
121.6  fps
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
low 640x480
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
193.5  fps
103%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
199.7  fps
100%
GeForce GTX 485M:
192.8  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
133.6  fps
100%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
134  fps
106%
GeForce GTX 485M:
141.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
94.7  fps
93%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
88.1  fps
72%
GeForce GTX 485M:
68.3  fps
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
350.9  fps
102%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
357.4  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
237  fps
103%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
244  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
193.4  fps
89%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
172.1  fps
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
med. 1024x768
GeForce GTX 485M:
81.7  fps
high 1024x768
GeForce GTX 485M:
78.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 485M:
59.9  fps
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
138.2  fps
96%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
132.1  fps
98%
GeForce GTX 485M:
135.6  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
87.8  fps
95%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
83.4  fps
100%
GeForce GTX 485M:
88.1  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
73.5  fps
94%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
68.8  fps
101%
GeForce GTX 485M:
74.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
31.7  fps
97%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
30.9  fps
71%
GeForce GTX 485M:
22.6  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
182.1  fps
94%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
170.3  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
92.4  fps
97%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
89.5  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
76.8  fps
95%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
72.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
30.4  fps
99%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
30.1  fps
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
154.8  fps
98%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
152.2  fps
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 470M SLI:
244.1  fps
100%
GeForce GTX 480M SLI:
244.9  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI → 97%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 93%

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M → 90%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 79%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Crysis 2166.6117.587.830.3
Call of Duty: Black Ops74.384.27573
Fifa 11455327271196.9
Mafia 297.990.88659
StarCraft 2220.985.985.256.5
Metro 2033116.280.848.1216.1
Battlefield: Bad Company 2134.510152
CoD Modern Warfare 2223.7130.9118.476.3
Risen160.399.972.652.7
Resident Evil 514096.9
Need for Speed Shift141.9106.9100.170.7
Colin McRae: DIRT 2159.9138.812470
Anno 1404214.283.3
F.E.A.R. 2271.6182.7153.588.5
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto65.563.962
Left 4 Dead184.3121.6
Far Cry 2192.8141.468.3
Supreme Commander - FA Bench81.778.959.9
Crysis - GPU Benchmark135.688.174.222.56
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


4
13


10
5

1
12
5
2
6
7
1






NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLIlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Call of Duty: Black Ops83.577.377.361.4
Fifa 11539336242151.2
Mafia 2124.4114103.976.6
StarCraft 228083.373.950.3
Metro 2033136108.165.523
Battlefield: Bad Company 2152.5134.5114.969.2
CoD Modern Warfare 2276.5163.9150.2104.4
Risen154127.9114.781.8
Resident Evil 5155.3113.8104.8
Need for Speed Shift114.2111.1102.7
Colin McRae: DIRT 2176.4164.5148.993
Anno 1404181.3109
F.E.A.R. 2224.9149145.4110.8
Left 4 Dead234.4195.9
Far Cry 2193.5133.694.7
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare350.9237193.4
Crysis - GPU Benchmark138.287.873.531.7
Crysis - CPU Benchmark182.192.476.830.4
Call of Juarez Benchmark154.8
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark244.1
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1
16


7
7


10
9
1
3
11
1






NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLIlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Mafia 2124.7113.2105.875.8
StarCraft 2279.674.964.642.5
Metro 2033134.4106.861.123.1
Battlefield: Bad Company 2151.6134.4110.664.7
CoD Modern Warfare 2277.5148129.190.3
Risen148.9125.7104.670.9
Resident Evil 5157.898.797.5
Need for Speed Shift113.8115.993
Colin McRae: DIRT 2188.2157.5130.781.3
Anno 1404173103.9
F.E.A.R. 2238.3160.2154.7108.7
Left 4 Dead244.2191.1
Far Cry 2199.713488.1
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare357.4244172.1
Crysis - GPU Benchmark132.183.468.830.9
Crysis - CPU Benchmark170.389.572.830.1
Call of Juarez Benchmark152.2
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark244.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps



15


6
6


9
8
1
3
10






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 19. 09:27:41

#0 checking url part for id 2104 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1857 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 2059 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Mar 2024 05:33:38 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.132s ... 0.133s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.133s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.133s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 2104 +0.033s ... 0.166s

#9 got single benchmarks 2104 +0.007s ... 0.174s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 1857 +0.002s ... 0.175s

#11 got single benchmarks 1857 +0.008s ... 0.183s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 2059 +0.002s ... 0.185s

#13 got single benchmarks 2059 +0.019s ... 0.204s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.204s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.254s ... 0.458s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.458s

#17 Got 198 rows for game benchmarks. +0.015s ... 0.473s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.473s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.012s ... 0.485s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.057s ... 0.541s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.541s

#22 return log +0.003s ... 0.544s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)