Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

The NVidia GeForce GTX 260M is a high-end graphics card of the 200M series based on the G92b core. Therefore, the 55nm chip is essentially a 9800M GTX with slightly higher clock rates (550/1375/950 vs. 500/1250/800). As a result, the 260M is more similar to the desktop 9800GT than the GTX 260.

As with all native DirectX 10 cards, the GeForce GTX 260M renders 3D images using "Unified Shaders". Dedicated pixel shaders and vertex shaders have been replaced with 112 stream processors in the 260M, which now take over most of the graphics workload. The shader units themselves are also clocked higher (1375 MHz) than the core chip.

In general, the performance of the GTX 260M is somewhat higher than the 9800M GTX due to the higher clock speed. For current DirectX 10 games such as Crysis, World in Conflict, Bioshock or Age of Conan, the 260M is sufficient for gameplay under medium to high detail settings. Meanwhile, older games should be able to run fluently under high resolutions and full details. VRAM can be up to 1024 MB GDDR3 at 950MHz  in MXM 3.0 or 800MHz in MXM 2.0.

The GeForce GTX 260M integrates the PureVideo HD video decoder. The GPU is thus able to assist the CPU in the decoding of H.264-, VC-1-, MPEG2- and WMV9 videos.

HybridPower is a Windows Vista-only technology that allows users to switch between the integrated and dedicated graphics core for power-saving purposes. In the future, Nvidia intends to evolve the software for automatic switching depending on the active application (now known as Optimus). GeForceBoost is not supported with the GTX 260M as there would be no performance gain from combining with the integrated GPU.

The high current consumption of up to 75 Watts (of the entire MXM board) means that the GTX 260M can typically only be found in larger notebooks with loud and powerful cooling systems.

Compared with Desktop graphics cards, the GTX 260M is most similar to the GeForce 9800 GT.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M is a high-end graphic card of the 200M series based on the G92b core and most similar to the Desktop GeForce 9800 GTX+. Therefore the 285M cannot be directly compared to the Desktop GTX 285. The chip is produced in a 55nm fabrication process, which is a step up from the 65nm process of the GTX 9800M. Its 128 pipelines are all enabled as well, as opposed to only 112 pipelines of the GTX 9800M. Compared to the GTX 280M, the GTX 285M features a slightly higher clock speed and is therefore only marginally faster (3-6% on average).

An innovation in the 200M series is the much accelerated switch times if using Hybrid Power (lower than 1 second compared to 7 seconds at the 9800M GTX).

Similar to all other cards with native DirectX 10 capabilities, the GeForce GTX 285M renders 3D images using "Unified Shaders". In other words, there are no longer any more dedicated pixel shaders or vertex shaders. Instead, new stream processors (128 of them in the 285M) now process most of the heavy graphics loading that would have otherwise been done by dedicated pixel and vertex shaders. In fact, the shader units are clocked higher than the core chip itself.

As previously mentioned, the GTX 285M is about 3-6% faster than the GTX280M due to slightly higher clock speeds. This means that notebooks equipped with the GTX 285M should run all modern and demanding games (as of 2009) in high details and resolutions. Only very demanding games, like Crysis Warhead or Metro 2033, may become unplayable if at maximum graphical settings.

Games with PhysX support (e.g., Mirror's Edge) may benefit from improved performance out of the 285M. Still, the Mobility Radeon HD 5870 is arguably a faster and better value single core GPU for laptops.

An advantage of the GeForce GTX 285M is the integrated PureVideo HD video processor (VP2). With this software feature, the 285M can assist the CPU in the decoding of H.264-, VC-1-, MPEG2- or WMV9 videos. 

HybridPower is an Nvidia power-saving technology for Windows Vista used for switching between integrated and dedicated graphics cards. In the future, Nvidia wants this switch to occur automatically with drivers (now known as Optimus). GeForceBoost is not supported with the 285M, as there would be no performance gain in combining the integrated GPU with the dedicated video card.  

The power consumption can be up to 75 Watts (if including the MXM board and VRAM). As a result, the 285M is usually reserved for larger desktop replacement (DTR) laptops with powerful cooling solutions.

In June 2010, the GeForce GTX 480M (mobile Fermi) was announced with a revamped architecture compared to the GTX 285M. Compared to the 285M, the Fermi core will support DirectX 11 and offer better performance at the cost of higher power consumption levels and possibly higher heat output. 

If compared to desktop graphics cards, the performance of the 285M can be considered somewhere in between the 9800 GT and the 9800 GTX, the latter of which is clocked considerably higher (675/1675/1100 MHz) in comparison.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260MNVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
GeForce GTX 200M Series
GeForce GTX 285M SLI compare 256 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1020 MHz
GeForce GTX 280M SLI compare 256 @ 0.59 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
GeForce GTX 260M SLI compare 224 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
GeForce GTX 285M 128 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1020 MHz
GeForce GTX 280M compare 128 @ 0.59 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
GeForce GTX 260M 112 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
GeForce GTX 285M SLI compare 256 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1020 MHz
GeForce GTX 280M SLI compare 256 @ 0.59 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
GeForce GTX 260M SLI compare 224 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
GeForce GTX 285M 128 @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 1020 MHz
GeForce GTX 280M compare 128 @ 0.59 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
GeForce GTX 260M 112 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 950 MHz
CodenameN10E-GTN10E-GTX1
ArchitectureG9xG9x
Pipelines112 - unified128 - unified
Core Speed550 MHz576 MHz
Shader Speed1375 MHz1500 MHz
Memory Speed950 MHz1020 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB1024 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption75 Watt
Transistors754 Million754 Million
technology55 nm55 nm
FeaturesHybridPower, PureVideo HD, CUDA, PhysX readyHybridPower, PureVideo HD (VP2), CUDA, PhysX ready
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement02.03.2009 02.03.2009
InformationMXM 3MXM 3
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.comwww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 4080     avg: 4953     median: 4901 (1%)     max: 5686 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
min: 6438     avg: 6521     median: 6498 (2%)     max: 6628 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 3840     avg: 4316     median: 4207 (2%)     max: 5058 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
min: 5501     avg: 5631     median: 5631 (3%)     max: 5761 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 32699     avg: 34053     median: 34304 (36%)     max: 34905 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 27301     avg: 29794     median: 30595.5 (16%)     max: 30685 Points
37372 Points (20%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 12669     avg: 14773     median: 15079 (17%)     max: 16611 Points
min: 18935     avg: 18965     median: 18964.5 (21%)     max: 18994 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
3DMark 06
10370 Points (14%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
3DMark 06
min: 9458     avg: 10167     median: 10064 (13%)     max: 11209 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
min: 12840     avg: 12989     median: 12988.5 (17%)     max: 13137 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x720 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
3DMark 06
10075 Points (13%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
3DMark 06
13729 Points (18%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.8 Points (86%)
min: 6.8     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (89%)     max: 7.3 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.8 Points (86%)
min: 6.8     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (89%)     max: 7.3 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
5.8 Points (85%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
5.9 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 3702     avg: 3966     median: 3917 (3%)     max: 4425 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
4941 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
28 fps (10%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
min: 30.82     avg: 31.4     median: 31.4 (11%)     max: 32.01 fps

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M → 121% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
GeForce GTX 285M:
54.9  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
45  fps
120%
GeForce GTX 285M:
53.8  fps
high 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
43.8  fps
119%
GeForce GTX 285M:
52.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 285M:
36.9  fps
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
154  fps
119%
GeForce GTX 285M:
184  fps
high 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
47  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 285M:
32.8  fps
low 800x600
GeForce GTX 285M:
66.3  fps
med. 1360x768
GeForce GTX 285M:
40.8  fps
high 1600x900
GeForce GTX 285M:
21.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GTX 285M:
13.7  fps
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
79.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
54.8  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
41.6  fps
113%
GeForce GTX 285M:
47.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
23.2  fps
112%
GeForce GTX 285M:
26  fps
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
137.4  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
59.1  fps
118%
GeForce GTX 285M:
70  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
55.4  fps
110%
GeForce GTX 285M:
61.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
40  fps
108%
GeForce GTX 285M:
43.3  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
51.3 80.3 ~ 66 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
41.3 50.5 ~ 46 fps
129%
GeForce GTX 285M:
59.2  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
31.7 36.5 ~ 34 fps
128%
GeForce GTX 285M:
43.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
26.9  fps
113%
GeForce GTX 285M:
30.3  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
66.5  fps
114%
GeForce GTX 285M:
75.8  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
61  fps
107%
GeForce GTX 285M:
65.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
39.1  fps
99%
GeForce GTX 285M:
38.6  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
92  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
79.2  fps
125%
GeForce GTX 285M:
99.3  fps
high 1360x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
61.5  fps
108%
GeForce GTX 285M:
66.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
35.3  fps
93%
GeForce GTX 285M:
32.9  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
125.2 133 ~ 129 fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
36.2 39 44 49.5 ~ 42 fps
111%
GeForce GTX 285M:
46.7  fps
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
313  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
105  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
89  fps
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
132 151.2 ~ 142 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
86.5 89 91.1 ~ 89 fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
63.8 65 67.4 73.4 77.4 ~ 69 fps
129%
GeForce GTX 285M:
89.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
41.8  fps
114%
GeForce GTX 285M:
47.6  fps
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

2008
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
57.9  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
48  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
36.7  fps
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
low 640x480
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
107 135.8 ~ 121 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
69 85.8 103.3 111.7 ~ 92 fps
Racedriver: GRID

Racedriver: GRID

2008
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
105 111.9 ~ 108 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
61.5 72 75.1 ~ 70 fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
52.7 53 56.2 59.1 ~ 55 fps
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
211.3  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
95.2 168.8 ~ 132 fps
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
52.8 67.3 77.8 88.5 ~ 72 fps
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
53.4  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
49.2  fps
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
92 123.7 ~ 108 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
56 57.2 76.9 ~ 63 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
31 38 38.4 39.3 41.9 ~ 38 fps
132%
GeForce GTX 285M:
50.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
12.2  fps
114%
GeForce GTX 285M:
13.9  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
110 129.5 ~ 120 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
49 52.6 76.9 ~ 60 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
30.7 35.5 37 37 39.2 ~ 36 fps
129%
GeForce GTX 285M:
46.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
11.5  fps
113%
GeForce GTX 285M:
13  fps
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
low 800x600
GeForce GTX 285M:
126  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
47 72 ~ 60 fps
140%
GeForce GTX 285M:
84  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
38 42 ~ 40 fps
133%
GeForce GTX 285M:
53  fps
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
22.7 26.6 27.2 ~ 26 fps
140%
GeForce GTX 285M:
36.5  fps
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
158  fps
Quake 4

Quake 4

2005
ultra 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
62  fps
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
high 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
51.8  fps
Counter-Strike Source

Counter-Strike Source

2004
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
121 270 ~ 196 fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
ultra 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
178  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GTX 260M:
575  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M → 118%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 117%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Mafia 254.953.852.236.9
StarCraft 218432.8
Metro 203366.340.821.3713.67
Battlefield: Bad Company 247.226
CoD Modern Warfare 27061.243.3
Risen59.243.430.3
Need for Speed Shift75.865.338.6
Colin McRae: DIRT 299.366.232.9
Anno 140446.7
F.E.A.R. 289.247.6
Crysis - GPU Benchmark50.313.9
Crysis - CPU Benchmark46.413
World in Conflict - Benchmark1268453
Call of Juarez Benchmark36.5
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1
2

3
4
1
7
4
4
8







NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Mafia 24543.8
StarCraft 215447
Battlefield: Bad Company 279.154.841.623.2
CoD Modern Warfare 2137.459.155.440
Risen66463426.9
Need for Speed Shift66.56139.1
Colin McRae: DIRT 29279.261.535.3
Anno 140412942
Sims 331310589
F.E.A.R. 2142896941.8
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto57.947.9736.74
Left 4 Dead12192
Racedriver: GRID1087055
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare211.313272
Supreme Commander - FA Bench53.449.2
Crysis - GPU Benchmark108633812.2
Crysis - CPU Benchmark120603611.5
World in Conflict - Benchmark6040
Call of Juarez Benchmark26
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark158
Quake 462
World of Warcraft51.8
Counter-Strike Source196
Doom 3178
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo575
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
5
8

6
8
1
1
12
6
3
4
5
1
1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 14:34:53

#0 checking url part for id 1111 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1582 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:40:26 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.083s ... 0.084s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.084s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.084s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1111 +0.025s ... 0.109s

#8 got single benchmarks 1111 +0.038s ... 0.146s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1582 +0.002s ... 0.148s

#10 got single benchmarks 1582 +0.015s ... 0.163s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.163s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.276s ... 0.439s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.439s

#14 Got 144 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.45s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.45s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.013s ... 0.464s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.063s ... 0.526s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.526s

#19 return log +0.04s ... 0.567s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)