Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 for laptops is a mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). Compared to the faster RTX 2000 GPUs (e.g. RTX 2060), the 1650 integrates no Raytracing or Tensor cores. The performance should be slightly faster than the old GeForce GTX 1050 Ti. Compared to the desktop version, the mobile GTX1650 can use all 1024 shaders of the TU117 chip, but there are also versions with 896 shaders.

Starting March 2020, the GTX 1650 Mobile is also available with fast 12 Gbits GDDR6 graphics memory (N18P-G61, 896 shaders) as a refresh.

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal.

Compared to the bigger Turing chips (like the TU116 of the GTX 1660 Ti and the RTX lineup), the TU117 does not include the new NVENC encoder but an older one similar to the one used in Pascal and Volta.

The power consumption of the 1650 for laptops is specified at 50 Watt TGP (Total Graphics Power) by Nvidia and therefore 15 Watt higher than the efficient (and slower) Max-Q variant of the 1650. The TU117 chip is manufactured in 12nm FFN at TSMC.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for laptops is a mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU116 chip). Compared to the faster RTX 2000 GPUs (e.g. RTX 2060), the 1660Ti integrates no Raytracing or Tensor cores. The performance is similar to the old GTX 1070 (laptop) but at a reduced TGP of 80 Watt (versus 115 Watt). Compared to the desktop GTX 1660 Ti, the clock speeds are reduced (3% lower base, 10% lower boost).

In April 2020 Nvidia refreshed the GTX 1660 Ti with the new codename N18E-G0-A1 with similar specs and pin compatible to the refreshed RTX chips (e.g., RTX 2070 Super Mobile).

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal.

The power consumption of the 1660Ti for latops is specified at 80 Watt TGP (Total Graphics Power) by Nvidia and therefore 20 Watt higher than the efficient (and slower) Max-Q variant of the 1660 Ti. The TU116 chip is manufactured in 12nm FFN at TSMC.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 MobileNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1600 Series
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) compare 1536 @ 1.5 - 1.77 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) compare 1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 1536 @ 1.46 - 1.59 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) compare 1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q compare 1536 @ 1.14 - 1.34 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) compare 1280 @ 1.53 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Desktop) compare 1024 @ 1.53 - 1.73 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compare 1024 @ 1.35 - 1.49 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 1024 @ 1.38 - 1.56 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) compare 896 @ 1.49 - 1.67 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compare 1024 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 1.02 - 1.25 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop) compare 1536 @ 1.5 - 1.77 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Super (Desktop) compare 1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 1536 @ 1.46 - 1.59 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 (Desktop) compare 1408 @ 1.53 - 1.79 GHz192 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q compare 1536 @ 1.14 - 1.34 GHz192 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Super (Desktop) compare 1280 @ 1.53 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti (Desktop) compare 1024 @ 1.53 - 1.73 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compare 1024 @ 1.35 - 1.49 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 1024 @ 1.38 - 1.56 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop) compare 896 @ 1.49 - 1.67 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compare 1024 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 1.02 - 1.25 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
CodenameN18P-G0, N18P-G61N18E-G0
ArchitectureTuringTuring
Pipelines1024 - unified1536 - unified
TMUs56
ROPs32
Core Speed1380 - 1560 (Boost) MHz1455 - 1590 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed12000 effective = 1500 MHz12000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5, GDDR6GDDR6
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB6 GB
Shared Memorynono
Memory Bandwidth192 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption50 Watt80 Watt
technology12 nm12 nm
PCIe4.0
Notebook Sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Date of Announcement23.04.2019 23.04.2019
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.nvidia.com/en-gb/geforce/gam...https://www.nvidia.com/en-gb/geforce/gam...
Transistors6.6 Billion

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
16.3 pt (18%)
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
26.9 pt (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 3080     avg: 3562     median: 3595.5 (19%)     max: 3978 Points
min: 4946     avg: 5717     median: 5697 (30%)     max: 6261 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 2900     avg: 3430     median: 3488 (16%)     max: 3700 Points
min: 5335     avg: 5653     median: 5659 (26%)     max: 6123 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 200727     avg: 325249     median: 364872 (49%)     max: 392682 Points
min: 412820     avg: 418846     median: 419800 (56%)     max: 424615 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 57517     avg: 91494     median: 82623.5 (11%)     max: 141041 Points
min: 129343     avg: 199337     median: 162584 (22%)     max: 316086 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 16079     avg: 24781     median: 25707 (31%)     max: 30573 Points
min: 29390     avg: 34346     median: 35118.5 (43%)     max: 38136 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 38016     avg: 55346     median: 57365 (23%)     max: 66073 Points
min: 59839     avg: 94171     median: 97517 (40%)     max: 104780 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 6909     avg: 8152     median: 8081 (20%)     max: 9201 Points
min: 12263     avg: 13237     median: 13140 (33%)     max: 14649 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 7741     avg: 9195     median: 9313 (18%)     max: 9810 Points
min: 14186     avg: 14867     median: 14818 (28%)     max: 16488 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 60813     avg: 106107     median: 85847 (11%)     max: 161091 Points
min: 129020     avg: 194329     median: 163522 (22%)     max: 359516 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
27315 Points (33%)
min: 32203     avg: 33044     median: 33043.5 (40%)     max: 33884 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
38744 Points (21%)
min: 63349     avg: 66325     median: 66325 (37%)     max: 69301 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 9774     avg: 11678     median: 11788 (24%)     max: 13143 Points
min: 15912     avg: 17361     median: 17351 (35%)     max: 19342 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 10885     avg: 12797     median: 13131.5 (19%)     max: 13575 Points
min: 18610     avg: 20096     median: 20118.5 (29%)     max: 22670 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 27719     avg: 31311     median: 31310.5 (26%)     max: 34902 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
49309 Points (41%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 28940     avg: 33810     median: 33809.5 (26%)     max: 38679 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
52230 Points (40%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
24001 Points (33%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3DMark 06
min: 23061     avg: 33654     median: 34484.5 (52%)     max: 40902 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
min: 36563     avg: 37825     median: 38153.5 (58%)     max: 38429 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3DMark 06
42416 Points (64%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
40.4 fps (18%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
100.6 fps (33%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
97.6 fps (43%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
120 fps (23%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
44.7 fps (19%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
8.2 fps (2%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
74.4 fps (28%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
34.5 fps (21%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
71.5 fps (25%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
7.7 fps (19%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
38.4 fps (21%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
61.5 fps (21%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
146.5 fps (39%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
54.5 fps (25%)
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
min: 64.8     avg: 65     median: 65 (30%)     max: 65.1 fps
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
11.8 fps (2%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
min: 14.49     avg: 14.7     median: 14.7 (2%)     max: 14.81 fps
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
41.2 fps (16%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
min: 73.8     avg: 74.2     median: 74.2 (28%)     max: 74.6 fps
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
28.1 fps (15%)
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
min: 38.27     avg: 38.6     median: 38.6 (21%)     max: 38.99 fps
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
120.4 fps (21%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
min: 165.2     avg: 166.2     median: 166.2 (29%)     max: 167.1 fps
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
85.6 fps (22%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
min: 117.1     avg: 118.9     median: 118.9 (31%)     max: 120.7 fps
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
61.2 fps (13%)
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
min: 85.4     avg: 86.4     median: 86.4 (18%)     max: 87.4 fps
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
103 fps (28%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
min: 138.8     avg: 140.7     median: 140.7 (38%)     max: 142.5 fps
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 10.18     avg: 10.5     median: 10.5 (8%)     max: 10.81 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 6572     avg: 8609     median: 6821 (29%)     max: 14363 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
min: 4020     avg: 8599     median: 8212 (35%)     max: 12878 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 69.6     avg: 84.9     median: 88 (32%)     max: 94 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
min: 73.8     avg: 76.5     median: 76.9 (28%)     max: 78.3 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 73.3     avg: 108.6     median: 103.6 (28%)     max: 160 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
min: 95.5     avg: 122.8     median: 120.6 (32%)     max: 148.2 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 99.6     avg: 99.6     median: 99.6 (100%)     max: 100 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
min: 99.6     avg: 99.6     median: 99.6 (100%)     max: 100 %
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
295.9 fps (9%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
775 fps (6%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
208.7 fps (57%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
331 fps (26%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
60 fps (38%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
87.1 fps (28%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
60 fps (29%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
225.5 fps (30%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
min: 60     avg: 99     median: 99 (3%)     max: 137.9 fps
143.9 fps (4%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 170.1     avg: 177.1     median: 177.1 (1%)     max: 184.1 fps
250.7 fps (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 1294     avg: 1479     median: 1478.5 (7%)     max: 1663 Samples/s
2416 Samples/s (11%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 2474     avg: 2873     median: 2872.5 (5%)     max: 3271 Samples/s
4827 Samples/s (8%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 6891     avg: 6931     median: 6931 (13%)     max: 6971 Points
10148 Points (19%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 52.5     avg: 79.8     median: 91 (14%)     max: 100 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
139 Watt (21%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 55.9     avg: 81     median: 85.8 (12%)     max: 94.3 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
min: 139     avg: 146.5     median: 146.5 (20%)     max: 154 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 57.3     avg: 88.8     median: 90.9 (20%)     max: 109 Watt