Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M

The Nvidia GeForce GT 325M is a DirectX 10.1 capable middle class notebook graphics card. Technically it is a slower clocked GT 330M and similar to the GT 230M. The core clock of the chip is a bit below the GT 230M, but faster memory is supported. The power consumption should be a bit below the average GT 230M.

 

The performance of the GT 325M should be similar to the GeForce GT 230M and therefore located in the middle class. The card should support DirectX 10.1 and all the features of the GT 230M (as it is based on the same GT216 core). Therefore, PureVideo HD (with VP4?) and CUDA support should be in the chip.

As with the GT 230M, the performance depends on the used graphics memory. With slow DDR2, the card can be up to 20% slower than with faster memory.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M

The Nvidia GeForce GT 335M (sometimes also called GeForce G335M) is a laptop graphics card for middle class gaming notebooks. It is based on the GT215 core (as the GTS 350M for example) but features only 72 shader cores and 24 Texture Mapping Units. Therefore, the GT 335M offers significantly more shaders than the GT 330M, but due to the low clock speed, the performance is not that much better. Compared to the GTS models, the GT 335M does not support GDDR5.

The 3D performance of the GT335M is on a level with the Mobility Radeon HD 5650 in the middle class. Therefore, the GPU is fast enough for all games in 2010. Demanding games like Metro 2033, Battlefield BC2 or Crysis run only in low-medium details fluently. Less demanding games like Call of Duty MW2 or Sims 3 can be played in high detail settings (see Benchmarks below).

As the other GeForce 300M cards, the GT335M offers Purevideo HD (VP4) to accelerate the decoding of HD videos. This means that the GPU offers the complete decoding of MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4 ASP, VC-1/WMV9 and H.264 videos.

Furthermore, CUDA, OpenCL, and DirectX Compute allow the usage of the cores for general computing (e.g., encoding of videos).

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M

The Nvidia GeForce GT 320M or GT320M was presented in the HP dv6t and dv7t series and should be based on a stripped down GT216 core with 24 instead of 48 shader cores.

Beware: The GT 320M should not be confused with the newer GeForce 320M in the Apple MacBook 13" 04/2010 laptops, which is a chipset graphics card.

In conjunction with the Nvidia 9100M G integrated graphics, the GT 320M supports Hybrid-SLI (only HybridPower). HybridPower is a technique to choose between the integrated and dedicated graphics core, if performance or battery runtime is needed. This works only in Windows Vista. Up to now the user has to use a tool to switch between the GPUs. Later Nvidia wants to switch automatically in the drivers. GeForceBoost is not supported with this card, as there would be no performance gain.

The GT 320M features 24 stream processors that do the graphic work of the vertex- and pixel-shaders. Nvidia Shaders are 1-dimensional and can therefore not be directly compared to the 5-dimensional shaders of AMD (HD 4650 e.g.).

The performance of the GT 320M is nearly on a level of the old GeForce 9600M GT (altough the 9600M GT features 32 shaders). Demanding Direct X 10 games like Crysis or Dirt 2 can only be played in low details fluently. Older games like Left 4 Dead can be played with high details fluently. More game benchmarks can be found below.

The GeForce GT 320M supports PureVideo HD (VP4) to decode HD videos with the GPU. H.264, VC-1, MPEG-2, and MPEG-4 ASP (DivX or xVID) can be fully decoded by the GPU. Futhermore, CUDA and DirectCompute are supported to use the processing power of the graphics card for other applications (with modern drivers). PhysX is currently not supported because of the low shader count.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 325MNVIDIA GeForce GT 335MNVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
GeForce GT 300M Series
GeForce GT 335M 72 @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 330M 48 @ 0.58 GHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 325M 48 @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 320M 24 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
GeForce GT 335M 72 @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 330M 48 @ 0.58 GHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 325M 48 @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 320M 24 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
GeForce GT 335M 72 @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 330M 48 @ 0.58 GHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 325M 48 @ 0.45 GHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 320M 24 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
CodenameN11P-GV1N11P-GS1
ArchitectureGT2xxGT200GT2xx
Pipelines48 - unified72 - unified24 - unified
Core Speed450 MHz450 MHz500 MHz
Shader Speed990 MHz1080 MHz1100 MHz
Memory Speed1066 MHz1066 MHz790 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR2, GDDR3, DDR3DDR3, GDDR3DDR3
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB1024 MB1024 MB
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1DirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1DirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1
technology40 nm40 nm40 nm
FeaturesDirectX Compute Support (Windows 7), CUDA, OpenCL, HybridPower, PhysXDirectX Compute Support (Windows 7), CUDA, OpenCL, HybridPower, PhysX, SLI, Powermizer 8.0, MXM 3.0 Type-B, 72 Shader, 24 Texture Mapping Units, 8 Render Output UnitsPCI-E 2.0, PureVideo HD (VP4), HybridPower
Notebook Sizemedium sizedmedium sizedmedium sized
Date of Announcement10.01.2010 07.01.2010 21.01.2010
Information142 Gigaflops223 GFlops
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.comwww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 2157     avg: 2165     median: 2161 (1%)     max: 2178 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
min: 2697     avg: 3015     median: 3106 (1%)     max: 3234 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
1205 Points (0%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 1742     avg: 1753     median: 1749 (1%)     max: 1768 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
min: 2592     avg: 2624     median: 2633 (1%)     max: 2651 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
min: 983     avg: 997     median: 997 (1%)     max: 1011 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 17887     avg: 18184     median: 18184 (19%)     max: 18481 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 13916     avg: 14930     median: 15232.5 (8%)     max: 15340 Points
min: 15146     avg: 17170     median: 16836.5 (9%)     max: 19526 Points
11831 Points (6%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 9933     avg: 10461     median: 10574 (12%)     max: 10617 Points
min: 9798     avg: 12228     median: 13115 (14%)     max: 13782 Points
7795 Points (9%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
3DMark 06
min: 5333     avg: 5550     median: 5373 (7%)     max: 5943 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
min: 5958     avg: 6544     median: 6892 (9%)     max: 6950 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
3DMark 06
min: 5936     avg: 5985     median: 5984.5 (8%)     max: 6033 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
min: 6462     avg: 6995     median: 6973 (9%)     max: 7549 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1366x768 + NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
3DMark 06
7700 Points (10%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
3DMark 06
7520 Points (10%)
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
3DMark 06
4706 Points (6%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
16.5 fps (3%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
min: 5     avg: 5.5     median: 5.2 (66%)     max: 6.3 Points
min: 6.2     avg: 6.3     median: 6.2 (78%)     max: 6.5 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 4.3     avg: 4.6     median: 4.7 (59%)     max: 4.8 Points
min: 3.2     avg: 5     median: 4.5 (57%)     max: 6.5 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 1903     avg: 3597     median: 3910 (3%)     max: 4665 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
min: 2446     avg: 3580     median: 3790.5 (3%)     max: 4294 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 13.7     avg: 13.9     median: 13.8 (5%)     max: 14.35 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
min: 16.12     avg: 17.2     median: 17.6 (6%)     max: 18.47 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
8.6 fps (3%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M → 131% n=5

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M → 65% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
low 800x600
GeForce GT 335M:
308  fps
med. 1024x768
GeForce GT 335M:
153  fps
high 1360x768
GeForce GT 335M:
98.2  fps
low 1024x768
GeForce GT 335M:
164  fps
med. 1360x768
GeForce GT 335M:
45.4  fps
high 1360x768
GeForce GT 335M:
30.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
GeForce GT 335M:
16.1  fps
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
35.5  fps
82%
GeForce GT 335M:
29.1  fps
med. 1360x768
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
24.4  fps
98%
GeForce GT 335M:
24  fps
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
45.9  fps
120%
GeForce GT 335M:
55  fps
65%
GeForce GT 320M:
29.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
25.4  fps
134%
GeForce GT 335M:
32.4 34.9 35.4 ~ 34 fps
61%
GeForce GT 320M:
15.6  fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
17.2  fps
139%
GeForce GT 335M:
24.2 24.3 24.4 ~ 24 fps
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
58.7  fps
160%
GeForce GT 335M:
65.2 123 ~ 94 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
31.8  fps
123%
GeForce GT 335M:
36 38.6 39.4 42 ~ 39 fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
26.8  fps
127%
GeForce GT 335M:
30.9 33.2 34.7 35.6 ~ 34 fps
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
51.5  fps
111%
GeForce GT 335M:
51.6 61.9 ~ 57 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
35  fps
89%
GeForce GT 335M:
29 29.4 33.6 ~ 31 fps
high 1366x768
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
25.7  fps
86%
GeForce GT 335M:
21.2 21.2 23.2 ~ 22 fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
GeForce GT 335M:
23.5 31.2 32.3 ~ 29 fps
high 1366x768
GeForce GT 335M:
28.2 29.5 30.2 ~ 29 fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
GeForce GT 335M:
42.5 67.9 ~ 55 fps
GeForce GT 320M:
36  fps
med. 1024x768
GeForce GT 335M:
32.4 34.8 46.8 49.2 ~ 41 fps
GeForce GT 320M:
22  fps
high 1360x768
GeForce GT 335M:
26.8 30.2 31.7 33.1 ~ 30 fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
89.6  fps
80%
GeForce GT 335M:
51.7 57.8 107.8 ~ 72 fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
18.4  fps
130%
GeForce GT 335M:
23.5 24.8 24.8 ~ 24 fps
F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
GeForce GT 335M:
75.5 144.5 ~ 110 fps
med. 1024x768
GeForce GT 335M:
46.9 47.2 62.6 63.6 ~ 55 fps
high 1280x1024
GeForce GT 335M:
36.8 36.9 39.4 39.6 ~ 38 fps
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
59.2 70.6 ~ 65 fps
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
low 640x480
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
71.6  fps
72%
GeForce GT 335M:
51.2  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
20  fps
156%
GeForce GT 335M:
31.1  fps
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
GeForce GT 335M:
58.3 73.2 ~ 66 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
26.4  fps
144%
GeForce GT 335M:
28 34.8 43.4 43.8 ~ 38 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
17.8  fps
135%
GeForce GT 335M:
22.5 22.7 24.9 25.2 26.1 ~ 24 fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
GeForce GT 335M:
71 84.6 ~ 78 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
25.9  fps
139%
GeForce GT 335M:
26.9 30 42.6 42.9 ~ 36 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
16.3  fps
135%
GeForce GT 335M:
20.7 21.3 22.3 22.6 23.1 ~ 22 fps
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
83  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
40 50 ~ 45 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
25 26 ~ 26 fps
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce GT 325M:
13.8  fps
125%
GeForce GT 335M:
17.3  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M → 119%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 121%

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M → 63%

NVIDIA GeForce GT 335Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Fifa 1130815398.2
StarCraft 216445.430.616.1
Metro 203329.124
Battlefield: Bad Company 2553424
CoD Modern Warfare 2943934
Risen573122
Need for Speed Shift2929
Colin McRae: DIRT 2554130
Anno 14047224
F.E.A.R. 21105538
Far Cry 251.231.1
Crysis - GPU Benchmark663824
Crysis - CPU Benchmark783622
Call of Juarez Benchmark17.3
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
4
5
2
2
8

1
6
5
1
2








NVIDIA GeForce GT 325Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Metro 203335.524.4
Battlefield: Bad Company 245.9325.3817.22
CoD Modern Warfare 258.731.826.8
Risen51.53525.68
Anno 140489.618.4
Left 4 Dead65
Far Cry 271.620
Crysis - GPU Benchmark26.417.82
Crysis - CPU Benchmark25.916.25
World in Conflict - Benchmark834526
Call of Juarez Benchmark13.8
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

4
3
4
3

8

1
1








NVIDIA GeForce GT 320Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Battlefield: Bad Company 229.915.6
Colin McRae: DIRT 23622
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1

2














For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 16. 14:45:54

#0 checking url part for id 1600 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1599 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1629 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:39:00 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.123s ... 0.124s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.124s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.124s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 1600 +0.037s ... 0.161s

#9 got single benchmarks 1600 +0.021s ... 0.183s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 1599 +0.002s ... 0.185s

#11 got single benchmarks 1599 +0.03s ... 0.214s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 1629 +0.002s ... 0.216s

#13 got single benchmarks 1629 +0.011s ... 0.226s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.226s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.393s ... 0.619s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.619s

#17 Got 145 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.632s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.632s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.011s ... 0.642s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.04s ... 0.682s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.682s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.684s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)