NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M

► remove NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M

The Nvidia GeForce GT 320M or GT320M was presented in the HP dv6t and dv7t series and should be based on a stripped down GT216 core with 24 instead of 48 shader cores.

Beware: The GT 320M should not be confused with the newer GeForce 320M in the Apple MacBook 13" 04/2010 laptops, which is a chipset graphics card.

In conjunction with the Nvidia 9100M G integrated graphics, the GT 320M supports Hybrid-SLI (only HybridPower). HybridPower is a technique to choose between the integrated and dedicated graphics core, if performance or battery runtime is needed. This works only in Windows Vista. Up to now the user has to use a tool to switch between the GPUs. Later Nvidia wants to switch automatically in the drivers. GeForceBoost is not supported with this card, as there would be no performance gain.

The GT 320M features 24 stream processors that do the graphic work of the vertex- and pixel-shaders. Nvidia Shaders are 1-dimensional and can therefore not be directly compared to the 5-dimensional shaders of AMD (HD 4650 e.g.).

The performance of the GT 320M is nearly on a level of the old GeForce 9600M GT (altough the 9600M GT features 32 shaders). Demanding Direct X 10 games like Crysis or Dirt 2 can only be played in low details fluently. Older games like Left 4 Dead can be played with high details fluently. More game benchmarks can be found below.

The GeForce GT 320M supports PureVideo HD (VP4) to decode HD videos with the GPU. H.264, VC-1, MPEG-2, and MPEG-4 ASP (DivX or xVID) can be fully decoded by the GPU. Futhermore, CUDA and DirectCompute are supported to use the processing power of the graphics card for other applications (with modern drivers). PhysX is currently not supported because of the low shader count.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M

► remove NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M

The Nvidia GeForce GT 325M is a DirectX 10.1 capable middle class notebook graphics card. Technically it is a slower clocked GT 330M and similar to the GT 230M. The core clock of the chip is a bit below the GT 230M, but faster memory is supported. The power consumption should be a bit below the average GT 230M.

 

The performance of the GT 325M should be similar to the GeForce GT 230M and therefore located in the middle class. The card should support DirectX 10.1 and all the features of the GT 230M (as it is based on the same GT216 core). Therefore, PureVideo HD (with VP4?) and CUDA support should be in the chip.

As with the GT 230M, the performance depends on the used graphics memory. With slow DDR2, the card can be up to 20% slower than with faster memory.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320MNVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
GeForce GT 300M Series
GeForce GT 335M (compare) 72 @ 450 MHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 330M (compare) 48 @ 575 MHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 325M 48 @ 450 MHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 320M 24 @ 500 MHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
GeForce GT 335M (compare) 72 @ 450 MHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 330M (compare) 48 @ 575 MHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 325M 48 @ 450 MHz128 Bit @ 1066 MHz
GeForce GT 320M 24 @ 500 MHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
ArchitectureGT2xxGT2xx
24 - 48 -
Core500 MHz450 MHz
Shader1100 MHz990 MHz
Memory790 MHz1066 MHz
Bus128 Bit128 Bit
MemoryDDR3GDDR2, GDDR3, DDR3
Max. Memory1024 MB1024 MB
nono
DirectXDirectX 10.1, 4.1DirectX 10.1, 4.1
Technology40 nm40 nm
FeaturesPCI-E 2.0, PureVideo HD (VP4), HybridPowerDirectX Compute Support (Windows 7), CUDA, OpenCL, HybridPower, PhysX
Size
Introduced21.01.2010 10.01.2010
CodenameN11P-GV1
142 Gigaflops
Manufacturerhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_gef...

3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
P Result 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
11831 Points (6%)
min: 13916     avg: 14930.2     median: 15232.5 (8%)     max: 15340 Points
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
7795 Points (17%)
min: 9933     avg: 10461.2     median: 10574 (23%)     max: 10617 Points
3DMark 06 + NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
Windows 7 Experience Index - Gaming graphics
min: 5     avg: 5.5     median: 5.2 (66%)     max: 6.3 points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Graphics
min: 4.3     avg: 4.6     median: 4.7 (59%)     max: 4.8 points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M → 100%

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M → 134%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

low 800x600
GeForce GT 325M:
35.5 fps  fps
med. 1360x768
GeForce GT 325M:
24.4 fps  fps
GeForce GT 325M:
»
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce GT 320M:
29.9  fps
154%
GeForce GT 325M:
45.9  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
GeForce GT 320M:
15.6  fps
163%
GeForce GT 325M:
25.4  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce GT 325M:
17.2  fps
GeForce GT 320M:
»
GeForce GT 325M:
»
low 800x600
GeForce GT 325M:
58.7  fps
med. 1024x768
GeForce GT 325M:
31.8  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce GT 325M:
26.8  fps
GeForce GT 325M:
»
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
GeForce GT 325M:
51.5  fps
med. 1024x768
GeForce GT 325M:
35  fps
high 1366x768
GeForce GT 325M:
25.7  fps
GeForce GT 325M:
»
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce GT 320M:
36  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce GT 320M:
22  fps
GeForce GT 320M:
»
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
GeForce GT 325M:
89.6 fps  fps
ultra 1280x1024
GeForce GT 325M:
18.4 fps  fps
GeForce GT 325M:
»
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
high 1024x768
GeForce GT 325M:
59.2 70.6 ~ 65 fps
GeForce GT 325M:
»
Far Cry 2

Far Cry 2

2008
low 640x480
GeForce GT 325M:
71.6  fps
high 1024x768
GeForce GT 325M:
20  fps
GeForce GT 325M:
»
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
GeForce GT 325M:
26.4  fps
high 1024x768
GeForce GT 325M:
17.8  fps
GeForce GT 325M:
»
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
GeForce GT 325M:
25.9  fps
high 1024x768
GeForce GT 325M:
16.3  fps
GeForce GT 325M:
»
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
low 800x600
GeForce GT 325M:
83  fps
med. 1024x768
GeForce GT 325M:
40 50 ~ 45 fps
high 1024x768
GeForce GT 325M:
25 26 ~ 26 fps
GeForce GT 325M:
»
Call of Juarez Benchmark

Call of Juarez Benchmark

2006
high 1024x768
GeForce GT 325M:
13.8  fps
GeForce GT 325M:
»

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M → 158%

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)