Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT

NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS

The Nvidia GeForce 9600M GS is a DirectX 10 graphics card for notebooks. Technically itis a slower clocked GeForce 9600M GT. It is also produced in 65nm and features a new PureVideo HD video processor (VP3) and HybridPower support.

Compared to the 8600M GT, the core clock is only slightly higher, which leads a similarperformance as the old 8600M GT, but because of the 55nm process it shoulduse less current. As the 8600M GT, the 9600M GT features 32 stream processors that do the graphic work of the vertex- and pixel-shaders.

In conjunction with the Nvidia 9100M G integrated graphics, the 9600M GS supports Hybrid-SLI (only HybridPower). HybridPower is a technique to choose between the integrated and dedicated graphics core, if performance or battery runtime is needed. This works only in Windows Vista. Up to now the user has to use a tool to switch between the GPUs. Later Nvidia wants to switch automatically in the drivers. GeForceBoost is not supported with this card, as there would be no performance gain.

Compared to desktop graphics cards, the 9600M GS is similar to the GeForce 9500 GS (which also descends from the G96 core). The similar named desktop CPU 9600 Series has a 256 bit memory bus and is therefore much faster.

NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT

► remove from comparison

The Nvidia GeForce 9650M GT is a DirectX 10 graphics card for notebooks and  technically a higher clocked 9600M GT. It is produced in 55nm and therefore the current consumption is similar to the 9600M GT which is produced in 65nm. As the 9600M GT it features the PureVideo HD video processor (VP3) and HybridPower support.

In conjunction with the Nvidia 9100M G integrated graphics, the 9650M GT supports Hybrid-SLI (only HybridPower). HybridPower is a technique to choose between the integrated and dedicated graphics core, if performance or battery runtime is needed. This works only in Windows Vista. Up to now the user has to use a tool to switch between the GPUs. Later Nvidia wants to switch automatically in the drivers. GeForceBoost is not supported with this card, as there would be no performance gain.

As the 8600M GT and 9600M GT, the 9650M GT features 32 stream processors that do the graphic work of the vertex- and pixel-shaders.

The performance of the 9650M GT should be somewhere near the 9650M GS because of the high shader clock rate (with GDDR3). According to Zepto (first manufacturer who announced the card) the 9650M GT should be up to 20% faster than a 9600M GT (in 3DMark06).

Compared to desktop graphics cards, the 9650M GT is similar to the GeForce 9500GT (which also descends from the G96 core). The desktop CPU 9600 GT has a 256 bit memory bus and is therefore much faster.

NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GSNVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
GeForce 9600M Series
GeForce 9650M GT 32 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9600M GT compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9600M GS 32 @ 0.43 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9650M GT 32 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9600M GT compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9600M GS 32 @ 0.43 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
CodenameNB9P-GENB9P-GT
ArchitectureG9xG9x
Pipelines32 - unified32 - unified
Core Speed430 MHz550 MHz
Shader Speed1075 MHz1325 MHz
Memory Speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR2, GDDR3GDDR2, GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB1024 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Transistors314 Million314 Million
technology65 nm55 nm
FeaturesPCI-E 2.0, 400 MHz Speichertakt bei GDDR2 und 800 MHz bei GDDR3PCI-E 2.0, 400 MHz Speichertaktung bei GDDR2, 800 MHz bei GDDR3, PureVideo HD Technologie (VP3), Hybrid SLI mit HybridPower (mit aktuellen nVidia Chipsätzen).
Notebook Sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Date of Announcement03.06.2008 19.08.2008
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com
Power Consumption23 Watt

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
1135 Points (0%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
1306 Points (0%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
905 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
1054 Points (1%)
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 23226     avg: 25075     median: 23837.5 (25%)     max: 29400 Points
min: 22522     avg: 24042     median: 23209 (24%)     max: 26575 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 11995     avg: 13120     median: 12525 (7%)     max: 14841 Points
min: 12933     avg: 13029     median: 13031 (7%)     max: 13117 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 7700     avg: 8844     median: 8887 (10%)     max: 9900 Points
min: 8350     avg: 8387     median: 8374 (9%)     max: 8454 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS
3DMark 06
min: 3200     avg: 3600     median: 3600 (5%)     max: 4000 Points
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
6000 Points (8%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS
3DMark 06
min: 3965     avg: 4383     median: 4382.5 (6%)     max: 4800 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
min: 4166     avg: 4808     median: 4880 (6%)     max: 5800 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS
3DMark 06
min: 3808     avg: 4506     median: 4506 (6%)     max: 5204 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
4679 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS
3DMark 06
min: 2102     avg: 3211     median: 3210.5 (4%)     max: 4319 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
4826 Points (6%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
5.3 Points (78%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
5 Points (74%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 2963     avg: 3076     median: 3076 (2%)     max: 3189 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
min: 3542     avg: 3798     median: 3632 (3%)     max: 4138 Points

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT → 118% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F.E.A.R. 2

F.E.A.R. 2

2009
low 800x600
100%
GeForce 9600M GS:
98.8  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9600M GS:
32.4  fps
Racedriver: GRID

Racedriver: GRID

2008
low 800x600
100%
GeForce 9600M GS:
50.7  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9600M GS:
31.3  fps
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare

2007
low 800x600
100%
GeForce 9600M GS:
118  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9600M GS:
38.9  fps
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9600M GS:
54.4 70.2 ~ 62 fps
69%
GeForce 9650M GT:
32.2 33.1 48.9 50.9 51.7 ~ 43 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9600M GS:
19.3 23 ~ 21 fps
105%
GeForce 9650M GT:
19.1 19.6 22.2 22.5 26.8 ~ 22 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9600M GS:
13.4  fps
97%
GeForce 9650M GT:
11.8 12.1 12.3 12.5 13.9 ~ 13 fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9600M GS:
49.9 52.7 ~ 51 fps
82%
GeForce 9650M GT:
32.3 33.2 46.5 49 49.7 ~ 42 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9600M GS:
22.1 23.2 ~ 23 fps
91%
GeForce 9650M GT:
18.3 18.6 21.4 21.7 25.2 ~ 21 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9600M GS:
12.7  fps
95%
GeForce 9650M GT:
11 11.2 11.5 11.5 12.8 ~ 12 fps
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
GeForce 9650M GT:
38  fps
high 1024x768
GeForce 9650M GT:
13  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
GeForce 9600M GS:
281  fps
127%
GeForce 9650M GT:
226 376 472 ~ 358 fps
med. 800x600
100%
GeForce 9600M GS:
29  fps
317%
GeForce 9650M GT:
27 120 130 ~ 92 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9600M GS:
28  fps
129%
GeForce 9650M GT:
27 41 41 ~ 36 fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
GeForce 9650M GT:
59.6 59.8 ~ 60 fps
med. 640x480
GeForce 9650M GT:
59.2 59.8 ~ 60 fps
high 800x600
GeForce 9650M GT:
57.4 58.7 ~ 58 fps
ultra 1024x768
GeForce 9650M GT:
56.4 58.4 ~ 57 fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9600M GS:
453.5  fps
111%
GeForce 9650M GT:
464.3 469.1 582 ~ 505 fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT → 122%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 93%

NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GSlowmed.highultraQHD4K
F.E.A.R. 298.832.37
Racedriver: GRID50.731.32
Call of Duty 4 - Modern Warfare11838.89
Crysis - GPU Benchmark622113.43
Crysis - CPU Benchmark512312.68
F.E.A.R.2812928
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo453.5
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
3
1
3
3

3


1









NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GTlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Crysis - GPU Benchmark432213
Crysis - CPU Benchmark422112
World in Conflict - Benchmark3813
F.E.A.R.3589236
Doom 360605857
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo505
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
1
1
2
1
2
3
2

1

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 10:02:07

#0 checking url part for id 751 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 877 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:40:26 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.103s ... 0.104s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.104s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.104s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 751 +0.035s ... 0.139s

#8 got single benchmarks 751 +0.033s ... 0.173s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 877 +0.002s ... 0.175s

#10 got single benchmarks 877 +0.017s ... 0.192s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.192s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.561s ... 0.753s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.753s

#14 Got 72 rows for game benchmarks. +0.009s ... 0.762s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.762s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.005s ... 0.767s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.023s ... 0.79s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.79s

#19 return log +0.081s ... 0.87s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)