Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT vs NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT SLI

NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT

NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT is a video card and capable of DirectX 10. Technically, it has 32 Stream Processors like the 8600M GT, but the core-, shader- and memory clock is higher. Therefore the performance is somewhat above the 8600M GT (according advertisements of NVidia clearly better) and should be sufficient for all current games.

The particularity of this video card are the "Unified Shaders". Pixel- and vertex-shaders do not exist any more but 32 of the so called Stream processors do the graphic work (which up to now pixel- and vertex shaders did).

3DMark benchmarks show a promising performance on the level of a 7900 GTX. Because of the small 128 Bit memory bus, the performance looks worse in games (especially in high resolutions). Modern DirectX 10 games like Crysis can not be played in the highest resolutions.

The PureVideo video processor enables the chip to help decode HD videos in H.264, VC-1, MPEG-2, and WMV9.

Some drivers called the 8700M GT NB8E-SE (880M GS).

NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT SLI

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT SLI

The NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT SLI are 2 DirectX 10 capable graphic cards, which are combined by SLI. Technically, each card contains 32 Stream processors like the 8600M GT but the core -m Shader- and memory clock is higher. Therefore the performance of each single card is somewhat higher than the 8600M GT (due to NVIDIA press releases much higher) and therefore should be sufficient for all current games in high resolutions. The SLI combination does not bring double performance and depends on the support in the game.

The 3d Mark values are very good (like with all graphic cards of the 8000 series). Nonetheless, the 128 bit Bus of each single graphic card reduces the gaming performance in high resolutions (and with activated Antialiasing). For example, the SLI combination does not achieve the values of a single 7950 GTX in F.E.A.R.. However, it is the fastest graphic solution for laptops with DirectX 10 support and allows to play all newest DirectX 10 games fluently (altough not in high details).

A particularity of the video card are the "Unified Shaders". There don't exist any more so called Stream processors but 32 so called Stream processors make the upcoming graphic work (which was done by pixel and vertex Shaders, up to now).

Drivers tell that the 8700M GT is called NB8E-SE (8800M GS) internally.

NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GTNVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT SLI
GeForce 8700M Series
GeForce 8700M GT SLI 64 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 8700M GT 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 8700M GT SLI 64 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 8700M GT 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
CodenameNB8E-SENB8E-SE
ArchitectureG8xG8x
Pipelines32 - unified64 - unified
Core Speed625 MHz625 MHz
Shader Speed1250 MHz1250 MHz
Memory Speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB1024 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption29 Watt58 Watt
Transistors289 Million578 Million
technology80 nm80 nm
FeaturesShader clock frequence 1250 MHz, PureVideo technology (H.264, VC-1, MPEG2, WMV9 decoding acceleration), MPEG2, WMV9 decoding acceleration), HDCP-capable, PowerMizer 7.0 power management (dynamic switching between performance and energy economizing), HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting), designed for Windows Vista, 16x full screen AA, 16x AF independent of angles, 128-Bit HDR illumination with AA, Dual-Link DVI-D exits for resolutions of TFT up to 2560x1600, PCI-E 16x, OpenGL 2.1, Gigathread technologyShader clock frequence 1250 MHz, PureVideo technology (H.264, VC-1, MPEG2, WMV9 decoder acceleration), HDCP-capable, PowerMizer 7.0 energy management (dynamic switching between performance and energy saving), HDR (high dynamic-range lighting), designed for Windows Vista, 16x full image AA, 16x AF independent on angles, 128-bit HDR illumination with AA, Dual-Link DVI exits for TFT resolutions up to 2560x1600, PCI-E 16x, OpenGL 2.1, Gigathread technology
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement12.06.2007 18.09.2007
InformationSlot MXM-III und aufwärts, 80nm HerstellungsprozessSlot MXM-III and more due to the 35W TDP, 80nm manufacturing  process
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.comwww.nvidia.de

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
2026 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT SLI
2196 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
1694 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT SLI
1783 Points (1%)
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 24463     avg: 26598     median: 24971 (26%)     max: 30359 Points
min: 26572     avg: 28439     median: 28650 (30%)     max: 30095 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 13340     avg: 14816     median: 14674 (8%)     max: 16577 Points
min: 22108     avg: 24181     median: 24181 (13%)     max: 26254 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 8484     avg: 9102     median: 8904 (10%)     max: 9945 Points
min: 12835     avg: 14111     median: 14494 (16%)     max: 15005 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT
3DMark 06
min: 4222     avg: 4624     median: 4592 (6%)     max: 5200 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT
3DMark 06
min: 4313     avg: 4833     median: 4804 (6%)     max: 5410 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT SLI
min: 7773     avg: 8211     median: 8176 (11%)     max: 8719 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
5.6 Points (82%)
5.6 Points (82%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
5.9 Points (87%)
5.9 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
3586 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT SLI
3912 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT SLI → 126% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8700M GT:
74.9  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8700M GT:
27.5  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8700M GT:
15.3  fps
131%
GeForce 8700M GT SLI:
20  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8700M GT:
69.8  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8700M GT:
26.8  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8700M GT:
14.2  fps
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8700M GT:
31  fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8700M GT:
20  fps
Command and Conquer III

Command and Conquer III

2007
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8700M GT:
30  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
GeForce 8700M GT:
30 134 308 479 ~ 238 fps
181%
GeForce 8700M GT SLI:
357 371 397 600 ~ 431 fps
med. 800x600
100%
GeForce 8700M GT:
25 31 95 169 ~ 80 fps
181%
GeForce 8700M GT SLI:
82 162 162 172 ~ 145 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8700M GT:
28 30 51 53 ~ 41 fps
207%
GeForce 8700M GT SLI:
55 57 114 114 ~ 85 fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
GeForce 8700M GT:
108.8 132.2 164.6 197.8 ~ 151 fps
126%
GeForce 8700M GT SLI:
152.4 208.6 208.8 ~ 190 fps
med. 640x480
100%
GeForce 8700M GT:
109 139 158.1 200 ~ 152 fps
120%
GeForce 8700M GT SLI:
148.9 186.6 211.7 ~ 182 fps
high 800x600
100%
GeForce 8700M GT:
108.2 116.8 150 167.1 ~ 136 fps
120%
GeForce 8700M GT SLI:
146.8 160.3 181 ~ 163 fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8700M GT:
86.1 86.2 123.6 126.2 ~ 106 fps
132%
GeForce 8700M GT SLI:
132.9 141.5 144.2 ~ 140 fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8700M GT:
424.1 470.3 562 ~ 485 fps
141%
GeForce 8700M GT SLI:
682  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT SLI → 149%

NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GTlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Crysis - GPU Benchmark74.927.515.3
Crysis - CPU Benchmark69.826.814.2
World in Conflict - Benchmark3120
Command and Conquer III30
F.E.A.R.2388041
Doom 3151152136106
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo485
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


2
2
2
1
1
1
3
2

2


1






NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT SLIlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Crysis - GPU Benchmark20
F.E.A.R.43114585
Doom 3190182163140
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo682
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps



2



2
1

1
2



1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 20:49:20

#0 checking url part for id 116 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 499 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:40:26 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.121s ... 0.122s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.122s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.122s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 116 +0.039s ... 0.161s

#8 got single benchmarks 116 +0.026s ... 0.187s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 499 +0.002s ... 0.19s

#10 got single benchmarks 499 +0.012s ... 0.201s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.201s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.217s ... 0.419s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.419s

#14 Got 66 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.425s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.425s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.428s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.018s ... 0.446s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.446s

#19 return log +0.059s ... 0.505s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)