Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT SLI vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT

NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT SLI

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT SLI

The NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT SLI are two single DirectX10 capable 8600M GT graphic cards in SLI combination. Depending on the particular games, the combination is about 0-60% faster than one single graphic card. DirectX9 games can be played with higher resolutions and high details fluently (if SLI is supported). DirectX 10 games are very demanding (e.g. Crysis and World n Conflict) and can't be played in highest DirectX 10 detail levels fluently, at moment. Perhaps, that will improve by later driver optimizing.

The 8600M is one of the best laptop-GPUs worldwide, which support DirectX 19 and H.264-decoding and accelerate HD-films.

A particularity of the graphic card are the "Unified Shaders" of ALUs (Arithmetic Logical Unit). There don't exist any more dedicated pixel- and vertex shaders but 32 so called Stream processors maintain the upcomming graphic work (which was done by the pixel and vertex Shaders, up to now). The advantage is that there is no idle time of the ALUs. The Stream processors of NVIDIA are 1-dimensional (1D) and can make one skalar operation per cloc with a MADD operation (addition and multiplication) and a MUL-operation (multiplication). Moreover, NVIDIA clocks the Shader-ALUs higher than the remaining chip.

The memory clock of each GeForce 8600M GT of the SLI combination depends on the implemented memory type: 400 MHz with GDDR2 and 700 MHz with GDDR3.

Compared with dektop graphic cards, the 8600M GT in SLI combination of the GDDR3 laptop version is scarcely below two 8600 GT SLI (each desktop card has a higher chip clock).

NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT

NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT is the DirectX 10 capable successor of the GeForce Go 7600 GT for laptops. Depending on the used graphic memory and the clock speed,  the performance is between the 7600 GT and 7900 GS video card. Therefore, games like Company of Heroes, Supreme Commander, or F.E.A.R can be played fluently with high details in a resolution of 1024 or similar. Still, the shader power is not sufficient to display DirectX 10 effects of games like Crysis fluently (Crysis will only run well in low details).  Gamers, who every time expect supreme frame rates, should get at least a 8800M card.

The 8600M series is one of the first-laptop-GPUs, which support DirectX 10 and accelerate the H.264-decoding of HD-movies.

The particularity of this video card are the "Unified Shader". Pixel- and vertex-shaders do not exist any more but 32 of the so called stream processors do the graphic work (which up to now pixel- and vertex shaders did).

The memory clock speed depends on the used memory: 400 MHz for GDDR2 memory and 700 Mhz for GDDR3 (which is noticeable faster).

The integrated PureVideo engine is one of the advantages of the 8600M GT. It supports (HD) encoding of H.264, VC-1, MPEG2, and WMV9 video content. Compared to the slower 8600M GS (and 8400M series) the 8600M GT supports a few more video features (see comparison chart).

NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT SLINVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
GeForce 8600M Series
GeForce 8600M GT SLI 64 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
GeForce 8600M GT 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
GeForce 8600M GS compare 16 @ 0.6 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
GeForce 8600M GT SLI 64 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
GeForce 8600M GT 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
GeForce 8600M GS compare 16 @ 0.6 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
CodenameNB8P-GSG84M
ArchitectureG8xG8x
Pipelines64 - unified32 - unified
Core Speed475 MHz475 MHz
Shader Speed950 MHz950 MHz
Memory Speed700 MHz700 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3, GDDR2GDDR3, GDDR2
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB512 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption20 Watt20 Watt
Transistors598 Million289 Million
technology80 nm80 nm
FeaturesTwo single graphic cards in SLI combination, Shader clock frequence 950 MHz, PureVideo technology (H.264, VC-1, MPEG2, WMV9 decoder acceleration), HDCP-capable, PowerMizer 7.0 energy management (dynamic switching between performance and energy saving), HDR (high dynamic-range lighting), designed for Windows Vista, 16x full image AA, 16x AF independent on angles, 128-bit HDR illumination with AA, Dual-Link DVI exits for TFT resolutions up to 2560x1600, PCI-E 16x, OpenGL 2.1, Gigathread technology

Shader clock frequence 950 MHz, PureVideo technology (H.264, VC-1, MPEG2, WMV9 decoding acceleration), MPEG2, WMV9 decoding acceleration), HDCP-capable, PowerMizer 7.0 power management (dynamic switching between performance and energy economizing), HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting), designed for Windows Vista, 16x full screen AA, 16x AF independent of angles, 128-Bit HDR illumination with AA, Dual-Link DVI-D exits for resolutions of TFT up to 2560x1600, PCI-E 16x, OpenGL 2.1, Gigathread technology
Notebook Sizelargemedium sized
Date of Announcement23.10.2007 09.06.2007
Informationmemory clock: DDR2 - 400 MHz
DDR3 - 700 MHz
Speichertakt (Vorgaben): DDR2 - 400 MHz
DDR3 - 700 MHz
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.dewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
1040 Points (0%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT SLI
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
1665 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
843 Points (0%)
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
26684 Points (28%)
min: 13417     avg: 22071     median: 22231.5 (23%)     max: 28050 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
21150 Points (11%)
min: 5244     avg: 10215     median: 10151.5 (5%)     max: 13515 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
12932 Points (14%)
min: 4279     avg: 6175     median: 6024 (7%)     max: 8078 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT SLI
3DMark 06
6614 Points (9%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
min: 2809     avg: 3269     median: 3277 (4%)     max: 3696 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280X854 + NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT SLI
3DMark 06
7050 Points (9%)
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
3DMark 06
min: 2671     avg: 3287     median: 3174 (4%)     max: 4294 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
3DMark 06
min: 2767     avg: 3477     median: 3370 (4%)     max: 4434 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 + NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
3DMark 06
3194 Points (4%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x720 + NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
3DMark 06
3646 Points (5%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
min: 5.2     avg: 5.3     median: 5.2 (76%)     max: 5.4 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
min: 4.5     avg: 4.8     median: 4.7 (69%)     max: 5.9 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT SLI
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
3231 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
min: 2100     avg: 3207     median: 3006.5 (2%)     max: 5230 Points

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT SLI → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT → 62% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8600M GT SLI:
52.6  fps
87%
GeForce 8600M GT:
50.8 40.3 43.8 50.3 ~ 46 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8600M GT SLI:
21.5  fps
88%
GeForce 8600M GT:
17.6 18 18.6 19.6 20 ~ 19 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8600M GT SLI:
12.8  fps
70%
GeForce 8600M GT:
7.6 8.7 9.8 10.1 10.1 ~ 9 fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8600M GT SLI:
54.4  fps
81%
GeForce 8600M GT:
34.8 42.9 46.8 51 ~ 44 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8600M GT SLI:
26.3  fps
65%
GeForce 8600M GT:
14 15.3 18.3 19 19.9 ~ 17 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8600M GT SLI:
11.3  fps
80%
GeForce 8600M GT:
7.2 8.6 9.4 10.1 10.7 ~ 9 fps
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8600M GT SLI:
37  fps
76%
GeForce 8600M GT:
27 29 ~ 28 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8600M GT SLI:
16  fps
81%
GeForce 8600M GT:
11 14 ~ 13 fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
GeForce 8600M GT SLI:
208  fps
126%
GeForce 8600M GT:
34 102 112 211 222 231 250 270 270 283 284 286 291 299 302 303 306 311 342 383 423 ~ 263 fps
med. 800x600
100%
GeForce 8600M GT SLI:
30  fps
250%
GeForce 8600M GT:
29 29 29 29 30 30 32 32 55 88 96 98 98 101 101 102 109 112 114 127 127 ~ 75 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8600M GT SLI:
29  fps
110%
GeForce 8600M GT:
13 24 25 25 26 27 28 28 28 29 30 30 31 31 31 36 36 37 43 44 73 ~ 32 fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
GeForce 8600M GT SLI:
159.8  fps
84%
GeForce 8600M GT:
96.7 106.4 107.1 111.9 115 119.8 132.5 132.5 135.5 141.3 142.3 145.5 149.7 150.2 151.8 153.9 167.3 169 ~ 135 fps
med. 640x480
100%
GeForce 8600M GT SLI:
160.5  fps
79%
GeForce 8600M GT:
97.5 103.8 111.9 113.2 113.8 118.3 121.9 123.2 125.8 126.1 126.4 127.8 130 133.6 143.7 150.2 150.5 170.8 ~ 127 fps
high 800x600
100%
GeForce 8600M GT SLI:
154.9  fps
73%
GeForce 8600M GT:
84.8 91.7 97.6 98.3 98.5 105 106.3 109.7 114.3 114.4 114.7 115.3 119 119.2 126.5 129.5 142.5 145.4 ~ 113 fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
GeForce 8600M GT SLI:
138.4  fps
57%
GeForce 8600M GT:
53.9 59.7 60.6 67.8 75.8 76.1 76.1 77 77.1 79.2 81.1 83.4 86.5 86.5 87.9 92.2 99.9 100.6 ~ 79 fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
GeForce 8600M GT:
153.3 236.5 239.3 268.4 345.3 348.4 365.2 422.2 451 453.8 461 474 479.8 ~ 361 fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT SLI → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT → 94%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 93%

NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT SLIlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Crysis - GPU Benchmark52.621.512.8
Crysis - CPU Benchmark54.426.311.3
World in Conflict - Benchmark3716
F.E.A.R.2083029
Doom 3159.8160.5154.9138.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2

2
2
2

1
4


1



1






NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GTlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Crysis - GPU Benchmark46199
Crysis - CPU Benchmark44179
World in Conflict - Benchmark2813
F.E.A.R.2637532
Doom 313512711379
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo361
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2

2
3

1
1
3
1
1
1


1






For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 11:07:34

#0 checking url part for id 510 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 81 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.152s ... 0.154s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.154s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.154s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 510 +0.03s ... 0.184s

#8 got single benchmarks 510 +0.024s ... 0.208s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 81 +0.003s ... 0.21s

#10 got single benchmarks 81 +0.11s ... 0.32s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.32s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.456s ... 0.776s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.777s

#14 Got 203 rows for game benchmarks. +0.09s ... 0.866s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.866s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.87s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.016s ... 0.887s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.887s

#19 return log +0.091s ... 0.978s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)