AMD FX-8800P vs AMD Pro A10-8700B

AMD FX-8800P

► remove AMD FX-8800P

The AMD FX-8800P is the top-tier Carrizo APU of 2015 for mainstream laptops. It is a SoC containing two Excavator CPU modules (with 4 integer and 2 FP units counted as 4 compute cores), a Radeon R7 graphics card with 8 compute cores (512 shaders), a DDR3-2133 (35 Watt cTDP) memory controller and a video engine (including UVD 6 with hardware HEVC / H.265 decoding).

The performances of the CPU and GPU cores depend on the configurable TDP. This cTDP can range from 12 to 35 Watts depending on the cooling solution and size of the laptop. Thus, clock speeds of the compute cores will vary. E.g., the GPU can score between 1992 points (15 Watts) to 2753 points (+38% with 35 Watts cTDP) in 3DMark 11 (P).

According to AMD, the 35 Watt configuration scores 12% (Cinebench single-thread) and 15% (Cinebench Multi-threaded) higher compared to the previous Steamroller generation (most likely the AMD FX-7600P). If configured to 15 Watt instead, the gains are higher (40% to 55%) compared to the 19 Watt Kaveri FX-7500 APU.

More technical details and features of the 6th generation of APUs (Carrizo) can be found in our launch article.

AMD Pro A10-8700B

► remove AMD Pro A10-8700B

The AMD Pro A10-8700B is a mid-range Carrizo APU of 2015 for mainstream laptops. It is a SoC containing two Excavator CPU modules (with 4 integer and 2 FP units counted as 4 compute cores), a Radeon R7 graphics card with 6 compute cores (384 shaders), a DDR3-2133 (35 Watt cTDP) memory controller and a video engine (including UVD 6 with hardware HEVC / H.265 decoding).

It is similar to the consumer version, the A10-8700P, but offers business support and a ensure a long-tail support program. 

The performances of the CPU and GPU cores depend on the configurable TDP. This cTDP can range from 12 to 35 Watts depending on the cooling solution and size of the laptop. Thus, clock speeds of the compute cores will vary. E.g., the GPU can score between 1764 points (15 Watts) to 2359 points (+34% with 35 Watt cTDP) in 3DMark 11 (P). CPU performance with a 35 Watt cTDP should be slightly above the Kaveri A10-7400P. If configured at 15 Watts, the CPU should be clearly slower as the Boost speed cannot be maintained for extended periods.

More technical details and features of the 6th generation of APUs (Carrizo) can be found in our launch article.

AMD FX-8800PAMD Pro A10-8700B
AMD CarrizoAMD Carrizo
CarrizoCarrizo
: Carrizo Carrizo
» AMD FX-8800P2100 - 3400 MHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A12-8800B (compare)2100 - 3400 MHz4 / 4
AMD A10-8700P (compare)1800 - 3200 MHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A10-8700B1800 - 3200 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-8600P (compare)1600 - 3000 MHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A8-8600B (compare)1600 - 3000 MHz4 / 4
AMD A6-8500P (compare)1600 - 3000 MHz2 / 2
AMD Pro A6-8500B (compare)1600 - 3000 MHz2 / 2
AMD FX-8800P2100 - 3400 MHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A12-8800B (compare)2100 - 3400 MHz4 / 4
AMD A10-8700P (compare)1800 - 3200 MHz4 / 4
» AMD Pro A10-8700B1800 - 3200 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-8600P (compare)1600 - 3000 MHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A8-8600B (compare)1600 - 3000 MHz4 / 4
AMD A6-8500P (compare)1600 - 3000 MHz2 / 2
AMD Pro A6-8500B (compare)1600 - 3000 MHz2 / 2
2100 - 3400 MHz1800 - 3200 MHz
2 MB2 MB
4 / 44 / 4
12-35 12 - 35
3100 3100
28 28
FP4 BGAFP4 BGA
HSA 1.0HSA 1.0
iGPUAMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo) ( - 800 MHz)AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) ( - 800 MHz)
AMD Carrizo Pro A10-8700B

Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
min: 207     avg: 255.3     median: 277 (6%)     max: 282 Points
192 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
min: 78     avg: 81.3     median: 82 (38%)     max: 84 Points
70 Points (32%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
min: 2     avg: 3.1     median: 3 (7%)     max: 3 Points
2.3 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
0.9 Points (47%)
0.8 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 2417     avg: 2604     median: 2604 (27%)     max: 2791 Points
2200 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
min: 6820     avg: 7860     median: 7860 (12%)     max: 8900 Points
5907 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
377.5 seconds (4%)
948.5 seconds (11%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
12 seconds (2%)
30.7 seconds (6%)
WinRAR - Result
1543 KB/s (18%)
897 KB/s (11%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
21.1 fps (12%)
9.1 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
93.5 fps (35%)
45.4 fps (17%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.3 GB/s (14%)
0.1 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.5 GB/s (15%)
0.2 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
2.2 GB/s (11%)
0.9 GB/s (4%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
4227 Points (28%)
2798 Points (19%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
19.1 Seconds (4%)
43.1 Seconds (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
41.4 Seconds (2%)
94.7 Seconds (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
873.7 Seconds (4%)
1994 Seconds (9%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
min: 10073     avg: 10091.5     median: 10091 (14%)     max: 10110 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
min: 2363     avg: 2764.3     median: 2753 (14%)     max: 3187 points
min: 2096     avg: 2123.5     median: 2123 (11%)     max: 2151 points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 24378     avg: 30900.8     median: 32521 (21%)     max: 34183 Points
21226 Points (14%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 2106     avg: 2720     median: 2843 (7%)     max: 2943 Points
1870 Points (5%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
min: 4031     avg: 4119     median: 4119 (13%)     max: 4207 Points
min: 1375     avg: 1975.5     median: 1975 (6%)     max: 2576 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
6349 Points (8%)
2728 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
2085 Points (43%)
950 Points (19%)
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
6719 Points (18%)
2906 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
2218 Points (45%)
1030 Points (21%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
min: 2262     avg: 3038.1     median: 3038 (5%)     max: 3813 ms
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
min: 181     avg: 193.4     median: 193 (2%)     max: 205 ms
Octane V2 - Total Score
min: 9042     avg: 12632     median: 12632 (24%)     max: 16222 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD FX-8800P → 100%

Average Benchmarks AMD Pro A10-8700B → 70%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)