AMD FX-8800P vs AMD Pro A10-8700B vs AMD A10-8700P

AMD FX-8800P

► remove AMD FX-8800P

The AMD FX-8800P is the top-tier Carrizo APU of 2015 for mainstream laptops. It is a SoC containing two Excavator CPU modules (with 4 integer and 2 FP units counted as 4 compute cores), a Radeon R7 graphics card with 8 compute cores (512 shaders), a DDR3-2133 (35 Watt cTDP) memory controller and a video engine (including UVD 6 with hardware HEVC / H.265 decoding).

The performances of the CPU and GPU cores depend on the configurable TDP. This cTDP can range from 12 to 35 Watts depending on the cooling solution and size of the laptop. Thus, clock speeds of the compute cores will vary. E.g., the GPU can score between 1992 points (15 Watts) to 2753 points (+38% with 35 Watts cTDP) in 3DMark 11 (P).

According to AMD, the 35 Watt configuration scores 12% (Cinebench single-thread) and 15% (Cinebench Multi-threaded) higher compared to the previous Steamroller generation (most likely the AMD FX-7600P). If configured to 15 Watt instead, the gains are higher (40% to 55%) compared to the 19 Watt Kaveri FX-7500 APU.

More technical details and features of the 6th generation of APUs (Carrizo) can be found in our launch article.

AMD Pro A10-8700B

► remove AMD Pro A10-8700B

The AMD Pro A10-8700B is a mid-range Carrizo APU of 2015 for mainstream laptops. It is a SoC containing two Excavator CPU modules (with 4 integer and 2 FP units counted as 4 compute cores), a Radeon R7 graphics card with 6 compute cores (384 shaders), a DDR3-2133 (35 Watt cTDP) memory controller and a video engine (including UVD 6 with hardware HEVC / H.265 decoding).

It is similar to the consumer version, the A10-8700P, but offers business support and a ensure a long-tail support program. 

The performances of the CPU and GPU cores depend on the configurable TDP. This cTDP can range from 12 to 35 Watts depending on the cooling solution and size of the laptop. Thus, clock speeds of the compute cores will vary. E.g., the GPU can score between 1764 points (15 Watts) to 2359 points (+34% with 35 Watt cTDP) in 3DMark 11 (P). CPU performance with a 35 Watt cTDP should be slightly above the Kaveri A10-7400P. If configured at 15 Watts, the CPU should be clearly slower as the Boost speed cannot be maintained for extended periods.

More technical details and features of the 6th generation of APUs (Carrizo) can be found in our launch article.

AMD A10-8700P

► remove AMD A10-8700P

The AMD A10-8700P is a mid-range Carrizo APU of 2015 for mainstream laptops. It is a SoC containing two Excavator CPU modules (with 4 integer and 2 FP units counted as 4 compute cores), a Radeon R7 graphics card with 6 compute cores (384 shaders), a DDR3-2133 (35 Watt cTDP) memory controller and a video engine (including UVD 6 with hardware HEVC / H.265 decoding).

The performances of the CPU and GPU cores depend on the configurable TDP. This cTDP can range from 12 to 35 Watts depending on the cooling solution and size of the laptop. Thus, clock speeds of the compute cores will vary. E.g., the GPU can score between 1764 points (15 Watts) to 2359 points (+34% with 35 Watt cTDP) in 3DMark 11 (P). CPU performance with a 35 Watt cTDP should be slightly above the Kaveri A10-7400P. If configured at 15 Watts, the CPU should be clearly slower as the Boost speed cannot be maintained for extended periods.

More technical details and features of the 6th generation of APUs (Carrizo) can be found in our launch article.

AMD FX-8800PAMD Pro A10-8700BAMD A10-8700P
AMD CarrizoAMD CarrizoAMD Carrizo
CarrizoCarrizoCarrizo
: Carrizo Carrizo
» AMD FX-8800P2100 - 3400 MHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A12-8800B2100 - 3400 MHz4 / 4
AMD A10-8700P1800 - 3200 MHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A10-8700B1800 - 3200 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-8600P1600 - 3000 MHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A8-8600B1600 - 3000 MHz4 / 4
AMD A6-8500P1600 - 3000 MHz2 / 2
AMD Pro A6-8500B1600 - 3000 MHz2 / 2
AMD FX-8800P2100 - 3400 MHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A12-8800B2100 - 3400 MHz4 / 4
AMD A10-8700P1800 - 3200 MHz4 / 4
» AMD Pro A10-8700B1800 - 3200 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-8600P1600 - 3000 MHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A8-8600B1600 - 3000 MHz4 / 4
AMD A6-8500P1600 - 3000 MHz2 / 2
AMD Pro A6-8500B1600 - 3000 MHz2 / 2
AMD FX-8800P2100 - 3400 MHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A12-8800B2100 - 3400 MHz4 / 4
» AMD A10-8700P1800 - 3200 MHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A10-8700B1800 - 3200 MHz4 / 4
AMD A8-8600P1600 - 3000 MHz4 / 4
AMD Pro A8-8600B1600 - 3000 MHz4 / 4
AMD A6-8500P1600 - 3000 MHz2 / 2
AMD Pro A6-8500B1600 - 3000 MHz2 / 2
2100 - 3400 MHz1800 - 3200 MHz1800 - 3200 MHz
2 MB2 MB2 MB
4 / 44 / 44 / 4
12-35 12 - 35 12 - 35
3100 3100 3100
28 28 28
FP4 BGAFP4 BGAFP4 BGA
HSA 1.0HSA 1.0HSA 1.0
iGPUAMD Radeon R7 (Carrizo) ( - 800 MHz)AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) ( - 800 MHz)AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) ( - 800 MHz)
AMD Carrizo Pro A10-8700BAMD Carrizo A10-8700P

Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
min: 207     avg: 255     median: 277 (6%)     max: 282 Points
192 Points (4%)
min: 175     avg: 190     median: 194 (4%)     max: 198 Points
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
min: 78     avg: 81.3     median: 82 (38%)     max: 84 Points
70 Points (32%)
min: 59     avg: 67.6     median: 69 (32%)     max: 75 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
min: 2.53     avg: 3.1     median: 3.4 (9%)     max: 3.39 Points
2.3 Points (6%)
min: 2.12     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (6%)     max: 2.36 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
min: 0.88     avg: 0.9     median: 1 (39%)     max: 0.98 Points
0.8 Points (33%)
min: 0.68     avg: 0.8     median: 0.9 (35%)     max: 0.89 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 2417     avg: 2604     median: 2604 (27%)     max: 2791 Points
2200 Points (23%)
min: 2170     avg: 2294     median: 2334 (24%)     max: 2389 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
min: 6820     avg: 7860     median: 7860 (13%)     max: 8900 Points
5907 Points (10%)
min: 4808     avg: 6140     median: 6394 (11%)     max: 6443 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
min: 8279     avg: 8769     median: 8924.5 (12%)     max: 8949 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
min: 3080     avg: 3212     median: 3251.5 (30%)     max: 3264 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
378 seconds (4%)
949 seconds (11%)
min: 507.427     avg: 536     median: 509.4 (6%)     max: 591.003 seconds
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
12 seconds (2%)
30.7 seconds (6%)
min: 16.564     avg: 17.1     median: 17.2 (3%)     max: 17.47 seconds
WinRAR - Result
1543 KB/s (18%)
897 KB/s (10%)
min: 1293     avg: 1316     median: 1328 (16%)     max: 1328 KB/s
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
21.1 fps (13%)
9.1 fps (6%)
min: 15     avg: 15.1     median: 15.1 (10%)     max: 15.23 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
93.5 fps (33%)
45.4 fps (16%)
min: 72.24     avg: 73.5     median: 73.7 (26%)     max: 74.41 fps
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.3 GB/s (14%)
0.1 GB/s (5%)
min: 0.18     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (10%)     max: 0.188 GB/s
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.4 GB/s (0%)
0.2 GB/s (0%)
min: 0.28     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (0%)     max: 0.303 GB/s
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
2.2 GB/s (11%)
0.9 GB/s (4%)
min: 1.4     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (8%)     max: 1.5 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU
4227 Points (28%)
2798 Points (19%)
min: 2776     avg: 2985     median: 2977.5 (20%)     max: 3186 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
19.1 Seconds (4%)
43.1 Seconds (9%)
min: 19.909     avg: 20.6     median: 20.5 (4%)     max: 22.254 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
41.4 Seconds (2%)
94.7 Seconds (4%)
min: 44.382     avg: 46.1     median: 44.8 (2%)     max: 50.362 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
874 Seconds (4%)
1994 Seconds (9%)
min: 954.493     avg: 985     median: 963.8 (4%)     max: 1071.86 Seconds
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
min: 10073     avg: 10092     median: 10091.5 (14%)     max: 10110 Points
min: 6309     avg: 6653     median: 6586 (9%)     max: 7129 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
min: 2363     avg: 2764     median: 2753.5 (13%)     max: 3187 points
min: 2096     avg: 2124     median: 2123.5 (10%)     max: 2151 points
min: 1794     avg: 2134     median: 2150.5 (11%)     max: 2310 points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 24378     avg: 30901     median: 32521 (21%)     max: 34183 Points
21226 Points (14%)
min: 13862     avg: 19941     median: 20873.5 (13%)     max: 22998 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
min: 13248     avg: 20904     median: 21997.5 (26%)     max: 23111 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
min: 21515     avg: 23082     median: 23204 (27%)     max: 24168 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 2106     avg: 2720     median: 2843 (7%)     max: 2943 Points
1870 Points (5%)
min: 1774     avg: 1897     median: 1903 (5%)     max: 2007 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
min: 4031     avg: 4119     median: 4119 (14%)     max: 4207 Points
min: 1375     avg: 1976     median: 1975.5 (7%)     max: 2576 Points
min: 2456     avg: 2673     median: 2685 (9%)     max: 2803 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
6349 Points (11%)
2728 Points (5%)
min: 4550     avg: 4670     median: 4676.5 (8%)     max: 4775 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
2085 Points (43%)
950 Points (20%)
min: 1941     avg: 1974     median: 1975 (41%)     max: 2006 Points
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
6719 Points (11%)
2906 Points (5%)
min: 4832     avg: 5014     median: 5105 (8%)     max: 5105 Points
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
2218 Points (45%)
1030 Points (21%)
min: 2065     avg: 2135     median: 2170 (44%)     max: 2170 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
min: 2262.4     avg: 3038     median: 3038.1 (5%)     max: 3813.7 ms
min: 2229.4     avg: 2673     median: 2285.5 (4%)     max: 3488.1 ms
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
min: 181.6     avg: 193     median: 193.4 (2%)     max: 205.1 ms
min: 154     avg: 203     median: 164.3 (2%)     max: 363.6 ms
Octane V2 - Total Score
min: 9042     avg: 12632     median: 12632 (24%)     max: 16222 Points
min: 8324     avg: 11931     median: 11800 (23%)     max: 15801 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD FX-8800P → 100%

Average Benchmarks AMD Pro A10-8700B → 69%

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-8700P → 84%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.9
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)