Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Samsung Exynos 9825

Samsung Exynos 9810

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9810

The Samsung Exynos 9 9810 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2018 and should be integrated in the upcoming Samsung Galaxy S9 series (at least partly). It integrates eight CPU cores (octa core) in two clusters. The performance cluster integrates four Samsung M3 at 2.9 GHz and the power efficiency cluster four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 1.9 GHz. The Samsung M3 cores are based on Samsungs own design and now offer a wider pipeline, improved cache memory and bigger caches. This leads to a twice as fast single-core performance and a 40 percent improved multi-core performance according to Samsung (most likely compared to the previous Exynos 8898).

The integrated LTE modem also got a siginifcant upgrade and now supports Cat.18/13 LTE for up to 1.2 Gbps download and 200 Mbps upload. This is achieved with 6x20 MHz CA, 256-QAM in download and 2x20 MHz in upload.

As a GPU, Samsung integrates a ARM Mali G72MP18 (only 18 clusters, compared to the 20 clusters of the predecessor G71MP20). Most likely Samsung increases performance due to a higher core clock of the graphics card.

The memory controller looks similar to the 8898 and supports LPDDR4x 1800 MHz. The video engine now also supports 10 bit videos (as before 4k120 H.265/HEVC, H.264 and VP9 de- and encoding). 

The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 10nm LPP process (the Exynos 8898 still used the 10nm LPE process) that should also help with some of the performance gains.

Samsung Exynos 9820

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9820

The Samsung Exynos 9 9820 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced late 2018 and was first integrated in the Samsung Galaxy S10 smartphones early 2019. The SoC integrates three clusters of processor cores with different architectures. Two big Samsung custom M4 cores clock up to 2.7 GHz and deliver peak performance. Two additional ARM Cortex-A75 are also for performance tasks and clock at up to 2.3 GHz. Finally, four small and power efficient ARM-Cortex A55 cores clock at up to 1.9 GHz are in the third cluster. The different clusters can run simultaneously thanks to DinamIQ.

The integrated LTE modem supports LTE-Advanced Pro Cat.20 (8CA 2 Gbps download, 3CA 316 Mbps upload). The integrated graphics card is a ARM Mali G76MP12 with 12 cores.

The performance of the CPU part is positioned in the high end segment for smartphone processors. The single core performance is, thanks to the big custom cores, a strong suit of the CPU and reaches the levels of Apples mobile SoCs. The direct competitor Snapdragon 855 can be left behind in single-core benchmarks like Geekbench and operates on par in multi-core benchmarks. The predecessor Exynos 9810 can be bested by around 17% in our first benchmarks with the Galaxy S10 Plus.

The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 8nm LPP process that should also help with some of the performance gains.

Samsung Exynos 9825

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9825

The Samsung Exynos 9 9825 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced in the Samsung Note 10 line in August 2019. The processor integrates three clusters of processor cores with different architectures. Two big Samsung custom M4 cores clock up to 2.73 GHz and deliver peak performance. Two additional ARM Cortex-A75 are also for performance tasks and clock at up to 2.4 GHz (up from 2.3 GHz in the 9820). Finally, four small and power efficient ARM-Cortex A55 cores clock at up to 1.9 GHz are in the third cluster. The different clusters can run simultaneously thanks to DinamIQ.

The integrated LTE modem supports LTE-Advanced Pro Cat.20 (8CA 2 Gbps download, 3CA 316 Mbps upload). The integrated graphics card is a ARM Mali G76MP12 with 12 cores. Thanks to higher clock rates, the G76 is now a bit faster compared to the Exynos 9820.

The performance of the CPU part is positioned in the high end segment for smartphone processors. Due to the slight changes in clock rates, it is very comparable to the older Eynos 9 9820. Maybe in longer load phases, the improved 7nm process helps to maintain clock speeds a bit better. The direct competitor Snapdragon 855 can be left behind in single-core benchmarks like Geekbench and operates on par in multi-core benchmarks.

The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 7nm LPP (with EUV) process that should improve power efficiency compared to the Exynos 9820.

ModelSamsung Exynos 9810Samsung Exynos 9820Samsung Exynos 9825
SeriesSamsung ExynosSamsung ExynosSamsung Exynos
CodenameExynos M3 / Cortex-A55Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Series: Exynos Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 98251.9 - 2.73 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 98201.9 - 2.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 9810 « - 2.9 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 98251.9 - 2.73 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 9820 « 1.9 - 2.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 9810 - 2.9 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 9825 « 1.9 - 2.73 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 98201.9 - 2.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 9810 - 2.9 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Clock <=2900 MHz1900 - 2700 MHz1900 - 2730 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8
Technology10 nm8 nm7 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G72MP18 GPU , 4x Exynos M3 (max 2.9 GHz), 4x Cortex-A55 (max 1.9 GHz) big.LITTLE, LPDDR4x Memory ControllerARM Mali-G76MP12 GPU , 2x Samsung Mongoose Custom CPU, 2x Cortex-A75, 4x Cortex-A55 big.LITTLE, LPDDR4x Memory ControllerARM Mali-G76MP12 GPU , 2x Samsung Mongoose Custom CPU, 2x Cortex-A75, 4x Cortex-A55 big.LITTLE, LPDDR4x Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-G72 MP18ARM Mali-G76 MP12ARM Mali-G76 MP12
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturernews.samsung.comwww.samsung.comwww.samsung.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 9820
0.8 pt (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 18756     avg: 23944     median: 26226 (22%)     max: 26851 Points
min: 31297     avg: 32016     median: 32228.5 (27%)     max: 32308 Points
min: 31908     avg: 32588     median: 32588 (27%)     max: 33268 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2546     avg: 2717     median: 2601.5 (31%)     max: 3120 Points
min: 2925     avg: 3123     median: 3043.5 (36%)     max: 3480 Points
min: 3389     avg: 3519     median: 3519 (41%)     max: 3649 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2561     avg: 2752     median: 2649.5 (30%)     max: 3148 Points
min: 3077     avg: 3226     median: 3087 (35%)     max: 3513 Points
min: 3498     avg: 3622     median: 3622 (41%)     max: 3746 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
825 Points (35%)
834 Points (35%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2259 Points (4%)
2331 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
679 Points (3%)
836 Points (4%)
min: 805     avg: 814     median: 813.5 (4%)     max: 822 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2033 Points (6%)
2306 Points (7%)
min: 2177     avg: 2184     median: 2184 (7%)     max: 2191 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3688     avg: 3721     median: 3698 (37%)     max: 3776 Points
min: 4499     avg: 4510     median: 4505.5 (45%)     max: 4529 Points
min: 4549     avg: 4550     median: 4550 (45%)     max: 4551 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8786     avg: 8874     median: 8874 (10%)     max: 8963 Points
min: 10162     avg: 10366     median: 10374 (12%)     max: 10553 Points
min: 10367     avg: 10426     median: 10425.5 (12%)     max: 10484 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3786 Points (52%)
min: 4881     avg: 4958     median: 4957.5 (67%)     max: 5034 Points
5109 Points (70%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8491 Points (21%)
min: 10000     avg: 10109     median: 10109 (25%)     max: 10218 Points
10487 Points (26%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5895     avg: 5915     median: 5915 (9%)     max: 5935 Points
min: 7690     avg: 7824     median: 7823.5 (12%)     max: 7957 Points
7453 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1961     avg: 1965     median: 1965 (29%)     max: 1969 Points
min: 2382     avg: 2388     median: 2387.5 (36%)     max: 2393 Points
2169 Points (32%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 895     avg: 1039     median: 1039 (8%)     max: 1183 Points
min: 1870     avg: 1985     median: 1984.5 (16%)     max: 2099 Points
3566 Points (29%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 1898     avg: 2002     median: 2001.5 (18%)     max: 2105 Points
min: 2997     avg: 3050     median: 3049.5 (28%)     max: 3102 Points
5534 Points (50%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 10213     avg: 10328     median: 10328 (20%)     max: 10443 Points
min: 14240     avg: 14552     median: 14552 (29%)     max: 14864 Points
13991 Points (27%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 5651     avg: 5656     median: 5656 (11%)     max: 5661 Points
min: 7271     avg: 7404     median: 7403.5 (15%)     max: 7536 Points
7083 Points (14%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 6025     avg: 6099     median: 6098.5 (16%)     max: 6172 Points
min: 8338     avg: 8493     median: 8492.5 (22%)     max: 8647 Points
8839 Points (23%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2060     avg: 2509     median: 2394 (3%)     max: 3189 ms
min: 1823     avg: 1961     median: 1890.5 (2%)     max: 2240 ms
min: 2478     avg: 2503     median: 2503 (3%)     max: 2528 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 12933     avg: 14397     median: 14711.5 (13%)     max: 15233 Points
min: 18697     avg: 20121     median: 20469.5 (18%)     max: 20849 Points
min: 18908     avg: 19022     median: 19021.5 (17%)     max: 19135 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 63     avg: 67.8     median: 68 (14%)     max: 72 Points
115 Points (24%)
min: 97     avg: 107.5     median: 107.5 (22%)     max: 118 Points
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
99150 Points (100%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 214090     avg: 218110     median: 217950 (74%)     max: 222290 Points
min: 269219     avg: 275038     median: 273831 (93%)     max: 283270 Points
min: 291772     avg: 292608     median: 292608 (100%)     max: 293444 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 7800     avg: 8235     median: 8294 (25%)     max: 8612 Points
min: 12202     avg: 12486     median: 12323.5 (38%)     max: 13096 Points
min: 18280     avg: 18321     median: 18320.5 (56%)     max: 18361 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 53528     avg: 55588     median: 55698 (68%)     max: 57538 Points
min: 67209     avg: 68326     median: 68203 (84%)     max: 69689 Points
min: 70640     avg: 70670     median: 70669.5 (87%)     max: 70699 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 91292     avg: 92956     median: 92887 (29%)     max: 94690 Points
min: 148074     avg: 148912     median: 149162 (46%)     max: 149249 Points
min: 155432     avg: 155907     median: 155906 (48%)     max: 156381 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 80534     avg: 86884     median: 88577 (54%)     max: 91540 Points
min: 97864     avg: 99848     median: 99722 (61%)     max: 102082 Points
min: 101869     avg: 102259     median: 102259 (63%)     max: 102649 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 236552     avg: 243663     median: 243861 (43%)     max: 250577 Points
min: 327454     avg: 329572     median: 328778 (58%)     max: 333277 Points
min: 347082     avg: 347156     median: 347156 (61%)     max: 347229 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
58288 Points (49%)
64371 Points (54%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
51005 Points (41%)
71200 Points (57%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
117851 Points (22%)
166540 Points (31%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
102716 Points (37%)
128208 Points (46%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
329860 Points (32%)
430319 Points (41%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 121702     avg: 154312     median: 154312 (20%)     max: 186922 Points
215665 Points (28%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 2385     avg: 2407     median: 2407 (13%)     max: 2429 Points
min: 5013     avg: 5063     median: 5075 (27%)     max: 5101 Points
5864 Points (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 5088     avg: 5342     median: 5341.5 (11%)     max: 5595 Points
min: 8407     avg: 8786     median: 8830 (19%)     max: 9121 Points
22707 Points (49%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5184     avg: 5411     median: 5305 (35%)     max: 5851 Points
min: 7595     avg: 7769     median: 7758 (51%)     max: 7966 Points
min: 8801     avg: 8914     median: 8914 (58%)     max: 9027 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5736     avg: 6022     median: 5891 (29%)     max: 6571 Points
min: 9557     avg: 9777     median: 9771.5 (49%)     max: 10008 Points
min: 11011     avg: 11412     median: 11412 (57%)     max: 11813 Points

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9810 → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9820 → 138% n=29

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9825 → 162% n=29

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 25. 23:16:05

#0 checking url part for id 9632 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11322 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11485 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.027s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9632 +0.003s ... 0.031s

#8 got single benchmarks 9632 +0.012s ... 0.043s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11322 +0.014s ... 0.057s

#10 got single benchmarks 11322 +0.012s ... 0.069s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11485 +0.002s ... 0.071s

#12 got single benchmarks 11485 +0.011s ... 0.082s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.082s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.239s ... 0.321s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.321s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)