Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1

Samsung Exynos 2200

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 2200

The Samsung Exynos 2200  is a high end SoC with 8 cores in three clusters. One fast ARM Cortex-S2 with up to 2.8 GHz for single thread performance. Three more slower ARM Cortex-A710 with up to 2.52 GHz for performance tasks and four efficient cores using the ARM Cortex-A510 architecture clocked at up to 1.82 GHz.

The SoC also integrates a 5G modem with up to 7.35 Gbps (5G NR Sub-6Hz, 5G NR mmWave, LTE Cat.24 DL / Cat.22 UL) similar to the Exynos 2100. In addition to this, an image processor for 200mP in single camera mode and 8K video, an AI engine with a dual-core NPU and DPS and various GNSS systems (GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo).

As a first, the Exynos 2200 integrates a graphics card based on the AMD RDNA 2 architecture called Samsung Xclipse 920).

The CPU performance in our benchmarks was slightly below the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (fastest Android SoC currently) and the Apple A15 in the iPhone 13.

The chip is produced in the modern 4nm process at Samsung using EUV.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 8+ Gen 1

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 Mobile Platform is a high-end SoC for smartphones that was introduced in mid 2022 and manufactured in 4 nm at TSMC. It integrates one “Prime Core” based on a ARM Cortex-X2 architecture clocked at up to 3.2 GHz. Three more performance cores are based on the Cortex-A710 but clocked up to 2.5 GHz. Furthermore, four energy saving cores are integrated that are based on the ARM Cortex-A510 architecture and clocked at up to 1.8 GHz. All cores can use the shared 6 MB level 3 cache.

Compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, the SoC is now produced in the more power efficient 4nm process at TSMC and offers higher clocked CPU and GPU cores (at a lower power consumption according to Qualcomm).

The integrated AI Engine can offer up to 4x faster AI performance thanks to the bigger Tensor engine. The 18-Bit-Spectra-ISP also saw some big improvements and is now called Snapdragon Sight.

The integrated Adreno 730 offers a 30% graphics boost compared to the previous Adreno 660.

The integrated Snapdragon X65 5G modem is also new and offers faster transfer rates (up to 10 Gbps download and 3 Gbps upload). The FastConnect 6900 offers support for the current Wifi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2.

ModelSamsung Exynos 2200Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
CodenameExynos X2 / Cortex-A710 / A510Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
SeriesSamsung ExynosQualcomm Snapdragon 8
Clock1820 - 2800 MHz1800 - 3200 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology4 nm4 nm
Features5G NR Sub-6GHz, 5G NR mmWave, LTE Cat. 24/22, LPDDR5-RAM, Dual-Core NPU, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.2Adreno 730 GPU, Spectra ISP, Hexagon, X65 5G Modem, FastConnect 6900 WiFi, LPDDR5-6400 Memory Controller
iGPUSamsung Xclipse 920 ( - 555 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 730
ArchitectureARMARM v9
Announced
Manufacturersemiconductor.samsung.comwww.qualcomm.com
Series: Snapdragon 8 Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 « 1.8 - 3.2 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 compare1.8 - 3 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
L3 Cache6 MB

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 3909     avg: 4039     median: 3978.5 (37%)     max: 4288 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 3923     avg: 4120     median: 4085.5 (47%)     max: 4385 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
1601 Points (40%)
min: 1530     avg: 1735     median: 1741 (43%)     max: 1854 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
3938 Points (15%)
min: 4140     avg: 4493     median: 4584 (18%)     max: 4761 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 1271     avg: 1650     median: 1771.5 (56%)     max: 1785 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 4025     avg: 4458     median: 4565 (19%)     max: 4677 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1133     avg: 1148     median: 1149.5 (45%)     max: 1161 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3474     avg: 3600     median: 3579.5 (6%)     max: 3768 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5788     avg: 5830     median: 5829.5 (58%)     max: 5871 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15209     avg: 15260     median: 15259.5 (15%)     max: 15310 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
15884 Points (25%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
6109 Points (91%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 840.3     avg: 1306     median: 1408.5 (2%)     max: 1566 ms
min: 665.3     avg: 1023     median: 908.2 (1%)     max: 1706.5 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
281.5 ms (3%)
190.4 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 34055     avg: 42162     median: 41695 (32%)     max: 51202 Points
min: 17622     avg: 42193     median: 40372 (31%)     max: 61536 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
130 Points (36%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 124     avg: 142     median: 149 (27%)     max: 153 Points
min: 106     avg: 159.4     median: 156.5 (28%)     max: 224 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 704479     avg: 797881     median: 818322 (40%)     max: 850401 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 145904     avg: 195898     median: 208772 (52%)     max: 220142 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
1124910 Points (37%)
min: 1162600     avg: 1270620     median: 1308220 (43%)     max: 1341050 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
327492 Points (10%)
min: 279154     avg: 333526     median: 359125 (11%)     max: 362299 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
70.5 MB/s (48%)
min: 46.8     avg: 58     median: 55.5 (38%)     max: 71.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
685 MB/s (19%)
min: 1222     avg: 1383     median: 1422 (40%)     max: 1504 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
41.6 MB/s (20%)
min: 37.6     avg: 40.3     median: 37.9 (18%)     max: 45.4 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
1300 MB/s (36%)
min: 1503     avg: 1624     median: 1588 (44%)     max: 1780 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 31101     avg: 33630     median: 33934.5 (15%)     max: 35551 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 12579     avg: 13805     median: 13820.5 (51%)     max: 14998 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 12233     avg: 12402     median: 12402 (81%)     max: 12571 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 888     avg: 979     median: 949.5 (36%)     max: 1129 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 6.24     avg: 6.7     median: 6.8 (3%)     max: 7.01 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0.625     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.913 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 2200 → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 → 118% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 24. 15:53:09

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14146 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14528 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1750773189s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Jun 2025 05:19:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14146 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 14146 +0.005s ... 0.01s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14528 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#10 got single benchmarks 14528 +0.023s ... 0.034s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.023s ... 0.057s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.058s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)