Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 vs Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y

Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6

► remove from comparison Intel E3-1505M v6

The Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 is a fast quad-core processor notebooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. It is the second fastest mobile Xeon model and the performance is slightly better tha the 100 MHz slower clocked consumer Core i7-7820HQ. Compared to the Core processors, the chip also supports ECC-RAM (error correction). Besides four cores including Hyper-Threading support running at 3 - 4 GHz (4 cores up to 3.6 GHz, 2 cores up to 3.8 GHz), the processor is also equipped with the professional HD Graphics P630 GPU as well as a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L-1600/DDR4-2400). It is manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Thanks to the higher clocks, even the smaller model of the mobile Xeons is ahead of the fastest Skylake models (Xeon E3-1575M v6) and is therefore als powerful enough for very demanding applications.

Graphics

The integrated professional Intel HD Graphics P630 has 24 Execution Units (similar to previous HD Graphics 530) running at 350 - 1100 MHz. The performance depends a lot on the memory configuration; it should be comparable to a dedicated Nvidia GeForce 920M in combination with fast DDR4-2133 dual-channel memory. It offers certified drivers for 15 professional and CAD applications.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors, which were announced in January, should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel still specifies the TDP with 45 Watts, but it can also be reduced to 35 Watts by the notebook manufacturers (cTDP down). This will obviously affect the performance, because the Turbo Boost cannot be maintained for longer periods.

 

Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium 4415Y

The Intel Pentium 4415Y is a low power entry level processor for small laptops or tablets and based on the Kaby Lake architecture. It was announced in Q2 2017 and offers two processor cores clocked at 1.6 GHz (no Turbo Boost). Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder. It is still produced in a 14 nm process with FinFET transistors. Compared to the much faster Core m3-7Y30, the Pentium 4415 offers no Turbo Boost, different CPU and GPU clock speeds, a smaller L3 cache and a higher TDP of 6 Watt.

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical. Only the Speed-Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of the voltages and clocks was improved, and the matured 14 nm process now also enables much higher frequencies and better efficiency than before. 

Performance

Due to the missing Turbo Boost, the Pentium 4415Y offers a significantly worse single thread performance than the more expensive Core m3-7Y30. This should be noticeable in daily tasks.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) like the old HD Graphics 515 and runs with clocks between 300 and 850 MHz in combination with this processor. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14 nm process with FinFET transistors, so the power efficiency was once again improved significantly. The TDP is rated at 6 Watt and can be reduced to 4,5 Watt (cTDP down).

ModelIntel Xeon E3-1505M v6Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
SeriesIntel Kaby LakeIntel Kaby Lake
CodenameKaby LakeKaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 48 MB
» Intel Xeon E3-1505M v63 - 4 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7130U compare2.7 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y1.6 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 48 MB
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v63 - 4 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7130U compare2.7 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 42 MB
» Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y1.6 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Clock3000 - 4000 MHz1600 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB512 KB
L3 Cache8 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 82 / 4
TDP45 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, SIPP, vPro, TXTDual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, TXT
iGPUIntel HD Graphics P630 (300 - 1150 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 615 (300 - 850 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$623 U.S.$161 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Kaby Lake E3-1505M v6Intel Kaby Lake Pentium 4415Y
SocketFCBGA1515

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 654     avg: 728     median: 737 (8%)     max: 792 Points
04080120160200240280320360400440480520560600640680720760Tooltip
164 Points (2%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 170     avg: 170.3     median: 170 (52%)     max: 171 Points
65 Points (20%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 7.89     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (15%)     max: 8.61 Points
1.8 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.9 Points (6%)
0.8 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6332 Points (57%)
2521 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
23780 Points (32%)
5586 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
7213 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3264 Points (20%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 319     avg: 327.2     median: 327.2 (4%)     max: 335.3 s
982 s (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 11     avg: 11     median: 11 (2%)     max: 11.02 s
31.1 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 3986     avg: 4554     median: 4554 (26%)     max: 5122 Points
1455 Points (8%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 48     avg: 48.5     median: 48.5 (20%)     max: 49.05 fps
11 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
185 fps (49%)
58.3 fps (16%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
1.1 fps (2%)
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.911.11.21.31.41.51.61.71.81.92Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.8 GB/s (0%)
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.4 GB/s (0%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7230     avg: 7714     median: 7713.5 (16%)     max: 8197 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 9     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (2%)     max: 10 s
16.3 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 20     avg: 21.5     median: 21.5 (1%)     max: 23 s
35.9 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 489     avg: 509     median: 508.5 (2%)     max: 528 s
1240 s (6%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 9594     avg: 9882     median: 9813 (34%)     max: 10239 Points
2319 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
44564 Points (29%)
20028 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
42023 Points (35%)
19576 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 52711     avg: 53987     median: 53987 (45%)     max: 55263 Points
20366 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 4304     avg: 6891     median: 8126 (21%)     max: 8243 Points
1836 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 6294     avg: 9708     median: 11348 (26%)     max: 11483 Points
2541 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4282 Points (23%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
14680 Points (26%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
4042 Points (79%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
15367 Points (24%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4224 Points (69%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 847     avg: 884     median: 897 (1%)     max: 907 ms
3077 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 36239     avg: 39903     median: 39902.5 (41%)     max: 43566 Points
11875 Points (12%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
81.1 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
78.7 Watt (21%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
10.1 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y → 43% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 04. 04:46:16

#0 checking url part for id 8448 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9580 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:14:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.007s ... 0.012s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.016s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#49 composed specs +0s ... 0.017s

#50 did output specs +0s ... 0.017s

#51 getting avg benchmarks for device 8448 +0s ... 0.018s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.021s

#54 got single benchmarks 8448 +0.01s ... 0.031s

#55 getting avg benchmarks for device 9580 +0s ... 0.031s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#58 got single benchmarks 9580 +0.008s ... 0.04s

#59 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.04s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.025s ... 0.064s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.068s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.071s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.075s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.079s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.082s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.085s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.088s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.091s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.093s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.096s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.098s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.015s ... 0.113s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.114s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.116s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.119s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.119s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.123s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.123s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.126s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.13s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.133s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.141s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.141s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.147s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.153s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.153s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.154s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.155s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.156s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.156s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.157s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.159s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.16s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.16s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.161s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.161s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.161s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.164s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.164s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.164s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.164s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.165s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.165s

#143 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.166s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.031s ... 0.196s

#145 return log +0.004s ... 0.2s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)