, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD E2-9000 vs AMD A6-9220e

AMD E2-9000

► remove from comparison AMD E2-9000

The AMD E2-9000 is the least powerful chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation) at the time of announcement in 2017. The SoC integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 1.8-2.2 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R2 GPU clocked at 600 MHz as well as a single-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports. Compared to the older E2-9010, the E2-9000 offers a lower base speed (1.8 versus 2 GHz).

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the E2-9000 with 10 Watts (compared to the 9010 at 15W). This means the APU is intended for thin and light notebooks.

AMD A6-9220e

► remove from comparison AMD A6-9220e

The AMD A6-9220e is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2017. The 9220e is an entry-level Stoney Ridge processor (dual-core version of Bristol Ridge) and integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 1.6 - 2.4 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R4 GPU, probably with 192 shaders at 600 MHz, as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports. Compared to the similar named A6-9220 the 9220e is significantly slower clocked (2.5 - 2.9 GHz) including the GPU (600 versus 655 MHz) and can be passively cooled thanks to the TDP of 6W.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Because of the significantly lower clock speed, the A6-9220e is noticeably slower than the A6-9220. In the Cinebench R15 Multi benchmark the 9220 reaches 38% higher scores, in the single thread test its more than twice as fast (219% versus the 9220 in the HP 255 G6). Compared to Intel CPUs, the A6-9220e is on par with the old Celeron N2820 in Cinebench (single and multi core). Therefore, the CPU is placed in the lowest segment (performance wise) and only suited for light tasks and light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) GPU is probably similar to the R5 with 192 active shader units (3 compute cores), but a reduced clock of just 655 instead of 800 MHz. More details about the GPU are available in the linked articles above. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A6-9220e with 6 Watts and therefore significantly below the 15 W of the A6-9220. This means the APU can be passively cooled and is a good choice for thin and light notebooks.

AMD E2-9000AMD A6-9220e
AMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol Ridge
Stoney RidgeStoney Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Stoney Ridge
AMD A9-9425 compare3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420e compare0 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220 compare2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9210 compare2.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-9010 compare2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E2-90001.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220e1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9425 compare3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420e compare0 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220 compare2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9210 compare2.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120 compare2.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-9010 compare2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-90001.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
» AMD A6-9220e1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
1800 - 2200 MHz1600 - 2400 MHz
1 MB1 MB
2 / 22 / 2
10 6
1200 1200
28 28
124.5 mm2124.5 mm2
90 °C90 °C
BGABGA
Single-Channel DDR4-1866, Virtualization,Single-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,
iGPUAMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
AMD Bristol Ridge E2-9000
160 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
73 Points (11%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
110 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
84 Points (2%)
0510152025303540455055606570758084.7483.0183.1283.5283.0882.9683.282.8682.482.7979.2379.577.7479.5480.3481.3180.5380.9280.180.48Tooltip
86 Points (2%)
051015202530354045505560657075808586.0734.741.6342.8543.2242.8342.7242.3641.1440.6339.7239.438.2538.4739.3841.174343.9844.4942.842.1840.2739.2538.9237.9637.8637.3736.6536.4335.7935.2633.332.7932.8432.87Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
47 Points (17%)
31 Points (11%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 E2-9000 +
1 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E2-9000 +
0.6 Points (19%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1787 (16%)
1056 (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2897 (5%)
1741 (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1242 s (15%)
1517 s (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
36.2 s (7%)
35.2 s (7%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
744 (5%)
519 (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
6.3 fps (3%)
2.7 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
35.7 fps (11%)
14.7 fps (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (4%)
0 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (4%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.7 GB/s (3%)
0.3 GB/s (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 E2-9000 +
1556 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
26.8 s (6%)
66.4 s (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
59.8 s (3%)
113 s (5%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1304 s (6%)
2732 s (12%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 E2-9000 +
3146 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
1199 Points (4%)
529 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
11949 Points (8%)
4502 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
10209 Points (11%)
4404 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
11528 Points (12%)
5273 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
914 Points (2%)
444 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1255 Points (3%)
376 Points (1%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2993 Points (24%)
3297 Points (27%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2893 Points (26%)
2796 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
2847 Points (6%)
3496 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
2914 Points (6%)
3085 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
2894 Points (8%)
3192 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
2323 (4%)
1929 (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1430 (29%)
1247 (26%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2439 (4%)
2003 (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1526 (31%)
1329 (27%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1543 (24%)
1112 (17%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2371 (6%)
1513 (4%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1591 (20%)
1260 (16%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
2461 (4%)
1571 (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
260 (14%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
293 (2%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3175 ms (5%)
4105 ms (7%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
259 ms (3%)
358 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
10575 Points (15%)
9070 Points (13%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
64 Points (22%)

Average Benchmarks AMD E2-9000 → 100% n=37

Average Benchmarks AMD A6-9220e → 75% n=37

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 15. 08:58:34

#0 checking url part for id 9294 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11876 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 12 Jun 2021 13:08:06 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.012s ... 0.012s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9294 +0s ... 0.013s

#7 got single benchmarks 9294 +0.008s ... 0.021s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11876 +0s ... 0.021s

#9 got single benchmarks 11876 +0.006s ... 0.027s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.036s ... 0.063s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.067s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)