Notebookcheck Logo

AMD E2-1800 vs AMD E-450 vs AMD E1-1200

AMD E2-1800

► remove from comparison

The AMD E2-1800 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the older E-450, the E2-1800 offers only slightly higher CPU (50 MHz)  and GPU (20-80 MHz) clock rates.

Inside the E2-1800 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-450 lies a bit beyond a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 7340 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD7340 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. The difference to the older 6320 in the E-450 is a 20-80MHz higher clock rate.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E-450

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-450 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the older E-350, the E-450 offers only 60MHz more clock speed, but a faster graphics card (thanks to Turbo Core) and DDR3-1333 and HDMI 1.4a support.

Inside the E-450 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-450 lies a bit beyond a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 6320 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6320 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E1-1200

► remove from comparison

The AMD E1-1200 (codename Zacate, not to be confused with the Ryzen 3 1200 from 2017) is a dual-core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It is produced on a 40 nm process and offers a relatively powerful integrated GPU and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller. Compared to the older E-300, which is based on the same chip, the E1-1200 offers a 100 MHz higher CPU clock rate.

The E1-1200 has two Bobcat cores running at 1.4 GHz (no Boost here) that can access 512 KB of L2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed.

The integrated Radeon HD 7310 GPU offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video decoder. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, an HD 7310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. The HD 7310's clock rate is 500 MHz to be very similar to the HD 6310 (488 - 500 MHz depending on the APU).

Performance

The average E1-1200 in our database is in the same league as the Celeron N2807 and the AMD E-300, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is an outrageously slow chip, as of mid 2022.

Power consumption

This E-series APU has a default TDP of 18 W, meaning an active cooling solution is pretty much a must.

The AMD E1-1200 is built with a 40 nm process for very, very, very low, as of 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD E2-1800AMD E-450AMD E1-1200
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
CodenameZacateZacateZacate
Series: E-Series Zacate
AMD E2-20001.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-1800 « 1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-15001.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
AMD E2-20001.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-18001.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-450 « 1.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-15001.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
AMD E2-20001.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-18001.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-15001.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1200 « 1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock1700 MHz1650 MHz1400 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP18 Watt18 Watt18 Watt
Technology40 nm40 nm40 nm
Die Size75 mm275 mm275 mm2
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 (BGA413)
FeaturesMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VDDR3-1066 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 7310
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.66 Points
min: 0.55     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.64 Points
min: 0.47     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (1%)     max: 0.54 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.26     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (8%)     max: 0.34 Points
min: 0.31     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (8%)     max: 0.33 Points
min: 0.27     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (7%)     max: 0.28 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 997     avg: 1093     median: 1110 (7%)     max: 1128 Points
min: 665     avg: 1013     median: 1062.5 (6%)     max: 1077 Points
min: 888     avg: 906     median: 912 (6%)     max: 918 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2068     avg: 2115     median: 2121 (2%)     max: 2147 Points
min: 1568     avg: 1961     median: 2020.5 (1%)     max: 2082 Points
min: 1654     avg: 1709     median: 1682 (1%)     max: 1791 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 2245     avg: 2312     median: 2321 (2%)     max: 2374 Points
min: 1968     avg: 2204     median: 2216.5 (2%)     max: 2299 Points
min: 1887     avg: 1909     median: 1913 (1%)     max: 1926 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 1099     avg: 1192     median: 1208 (1%)     max: 1226 Points
min: 1011     avg: 1137     median: 1170.5 (1%)     max: 1180 Points
min: 984     avg: 1000     median: 1008 (1%)     max: 1008 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1900     avg: 2126     median: 2152 (25%)     max: 2381 s
min: 2006     avg: 2017     median: 2021 (24%)     max: 2025 s
min: 2347     avg: 2479     median: 2410 (28%)     max: 2679 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 60     avg: 67.2     median: 69.1 (14%)     max: 72.3 s
min: 62     avg: 65.2     median: 64.5 (13%)     max: 69.6 s
min: 74     avg: 78.7     median: 76 (15%)     max: 86.2 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 456     avg: 482.3     median: 486 (1%)     max: 505 Points
min: 485     avg: 491     median: 489 (1%)     max: 499 Points
min: 398     avg: 417.5     median: 417.5 (1%)     max: 437 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 E2-1800 +
3.3 fps (1%)
89%
1 E-450 +
2.9 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 E2-1800 +
18.3 fps (4%)
88%
1 E-450 +
16.2 fps (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 0.0263     avg: 0     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.0526 GB/s
101%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.05     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.0511 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 0.0406     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (1%)     max: 0.0759 GB/s
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.072     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (1%)     max: 0.0747 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 0.0891     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.0961 GB/s
96%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.0889     avg: 0.4     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.94 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 527     avg: 1025     median: 1082.5 (2%)     max: 1124 Points
min: 1004     avg: 1030     median: 1034.5 (2%)     max: 1070 Points
min: 837     avg: 872     median: 873.5 (2%)     max: 905 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 45     avg: 46.7     median: 46.6 (10%)     max: 48 s
min: 47     avg: 47.7     median: 47.5 (10%)     max: 48.69 s
min: 48.44     avg: 54.1     median: 57 (12%)     max: 57 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 101     avg: 105     median: 103.2 (4%)     max: 114.8 s
min: 105     avg: 107.1     median: 107.4 (5%)     max: 109 s
min: 110.5     avg: 120.8     median: 124 (5%)     max: 128 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2250     avg: 2300     median: 2277 (10%)     max: 2384 s
min: 2334     avg: 2364     median: 2369 (11%)     max: 2384 s
min: 2718     avg: 2755     median: 2766 (12%)     max: 2780 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 9610     avg: 9926     median: 9800 (5%)     max: 10530 MIPS
9480 MIPS (4%)
8000 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 7900     avg: 7972     median: 8000 (6%)     max: 8000 MFLOPS
7530 MFLOPS (6%)
6460 MFLOPS (5%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 E-450 +
3310 Points (7%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
3.9 Points (50%)
min: 3.8     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (50%)     max: 3.9 Points
min: 3.4     avg: 3.5     median: 3.6 (46%)     max: 3.6 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 1858     avg: 2000     median: 1993 (2%)     max: 2146 Points
min: 1625     avg: 1864     median: 1892 (2%)     max: 2123 Points
min: 1347     avg: 1594     median: 1645.5 (1%)     max: 1738 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 682     avg: 724     median: 736 (2%)     max: 740 Points
min: 587     avg: 681     median: 703 (2%)     max: 721 Points
min: 598     avg: 602     median: 604 (2%)     max: 605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 9739     avg: 9796     median: 9796 (8%)     max: 9853 Points
8205 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 701     avg: 708     median: 708 (2%)     max: 715 Points
596 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 935     avg: 939     median: 938.5 (2%)     max: 942 Points
748 Points (1%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1784     avg: 1789     median: 1788.5 (14%)     max: 1793 Points
1437 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1487     avg: 1502     median: 1502 (14%)     max: 1517 Points
1179 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1939     avg: 1949     median: 1948.5 (4%)     max: 1958 Points
1597 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1770     avg: 1772     median: 1772 (4%)     max: 1774 Points
1433 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1775     avg: 1781     median: 1781 (5%)     max: 1787 Points
1440 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks AMD E2-1800 → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks AMD E-450 → 98% n=18

Average Benchmarks AMD E1-1200 → 87% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 28. 21:49:22

#0 checking url part for id 3144 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2852 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3146 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.026s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.026s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3144 +0.002s ... 0.028s

#8 got single benchmarks 3144 +0.029s ... 0.057s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 2852 +0.003s ... 0.06s

#10 got single benchmarks 2852 +0.038s ... 0.098s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 3146 +0.002s ... 0.1s

#12 got single benchmarks 3146 +0.015s ... 0.115s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.115s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.243s ... 0.357s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.358s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)