Notebookcheck Logo

AMD E1-1200 vs AMD E2-1800 vs AMD E-300

AMD E1-1200

► remove from comparison

The AMD E1-1200 (codename Zacate, not to be confused with the Ryzen 3 1200 from 2017) is a dual-core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It is produced on a 40 nm process and offers a relatively powerful integrated GPU and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller. Compared to the older E-300, which is based on the same chip, the E1-1200 offers a 100 MHz higher CPU clock rate.

The E1-1200 has two Bobcat cores running at 1.4 GHz (no Boost here) that can access 512 KB of L2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed.

The integrated Radeon HD 7310 GPU offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video decoder. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, an HD 7310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. The HD 7310's clock rate is 500 MHz to be very similar to the HD 6310 (488 - 500 MHz depending on the APU).

Performance

The average E1-1200 in our database is in the same league as the Celeron N2807 and the AMD E-300, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is an outrageously slow chip, as of mid 2022.

Power consumption

This E-series APU has a default TDP of 18 W, meaning an active cooling solution is pretty much a must.

The AMD E1-1200 is built with a 40 nm process for very, very, very low, as of 2022, energy efficiency.

AMD E2-1800

► remove from comparison

The AMD E2-1800 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the older E-450, the E2-1800 offers only slightly higher CPU (50 MHz)  and GPU (20-80 MHz) clock rates.

Inside the E2-1800 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-450 lies a bit beyond a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 7340 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD7340 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. The difference to the older 6320 in the E-450 is a 20-80MHz higher clock rate.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E-300

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-300 (codename Zacate) is a low-end dual-core processor designed for the smaller laptops and netbooks. The E-series processor has a relatively fast iGPU and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

An E-300 has two Bobcat processor cores running at 1.3 GHz, each with the access to 512 KB of Level 2 cache (1 M in total). In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an out-of-order execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed.

The Radeon HD 6310 iGPU has 80 unified shaders and an UVD3 video processing engine. The iGPU has no trouble outshining the Intel GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, and it does not lag behind the Nvidia ION, either. The Radeon has support for HDMI 1.4a video output.

Performance

The average E-300 in our database is in the same league as the A4-1250, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which isn't a great result. This is a fairly slow chip, as of mid 2022; expect to see plenty of slowdowns no matter what it is that you are currently doing.

Power consumption

This APU has a default TDP of 18 W, meaning an active cooling solution is a must.

The AMD E-300 is manufactured on a 32 nm process leading to really, really low, as of 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD E1-1200AMD E2-1800AMD E-300
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
CodenameZacateZacateZacate
Series: E-Series Zacate
AMD E2-20001.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-18001.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-15001.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1200 « 1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
AMD E2-20001.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-1800 « 1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-15001.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
AMD E2-20001.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-18001.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-15001.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-300 « 1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock1400 MHz1700 MHz1300 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP18 Watt18 Watt18 Watt
Technology40 nm40 nm32 nm
Die Size75 mm275 mm275 mm2
SocketFT1 (BGA413)FT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 (BGA413)
FeaturesDDR3-1066 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4AMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VDDR3-1066 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 2 [?], MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SVM
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 7310AMD Radeon HD 6310
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.47     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (1%)     max: 0.54 Points
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.66 Points
min: 0.46     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (1%)     max: 0.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.27     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (7%)     max: 0.28 Points
min: 0.26     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (8%)     max: 0.34 Points
min: 0.24     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (6%)     max: 0.26 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 888     avg: 906     median: 912 (6%)     max: 918 Points
min: 997     avg: 1093     median: 1110 (7%)     max: 1128 Points
853 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 1654     avg: 1709     median: 1682 (1%)     max: 1791 Points
min: 2068     avg: 2115     median: 2121 (2%)     max: 2147 Points
1176 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 1887     avg: 1909     median: 1913 (1%)     max: 1926 Points
min: 2245     avg: 2312     median: 2321 (2%)     max: 2374 Points
min: 1714     avg: 1762     median: 1761.5 (1%)     max: 1809 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 984     avg: 1000     median: 1008 (1%)     max: 1008 Points
min: 1099     avg: 1192     median: 1208 (1%)     max: 1226 Points
min: 899     avg: 920     median: 920 (1%)     max: 941 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 2347     avg: 2479     median: 2410 (28%)     max: 2679 s
min: 1900     avg: 2126     median: 2152 (25%)     max: 2381 s
2511 s (30%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 74     avg: 78.7     median: 76 (15%)     max: 86.2 s
min: 60     avg: 67.2     median: 69.1 (14%)     max: 72.3 s
79 s (16%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 398     avg: 417.5     median: 417.5 (1%)     max: 437 Points
116%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 456     avg: 482.3     median: 486 (1%)     max: 505 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 E2-1800 +
3.3 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 E2-1800 +
18.3 fps (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 0.0263     avg: 0     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.0526 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 0.0406     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (1%)     max: 0.0759 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 0.0891     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.0961 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 837     avg: 872     median: 873.5 (2%)     max: 905 Points
min: 527     avg: 1025     median: 1082.5 (2%)     max: 1124 Points
min: 836     avg: 839     median: 838.5 (2%)     max: 841 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 48.44     avg: 54.1     median: 57 (12%)     max: 57 s
min: 45     avg: 46.7     median: 46.6 (10%)     max: 48 s
min: 59     avg: 59.5     median: 59.5 (13%)     max: 60 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 110.5     avg: 120.8     median: 124 (5%)     max: 128 s
min: 101     avg: 105     median: 103.2 (4%)     max: 114.8 s
min: 132     avg: 133.5     median: 133.5 (6%)     max: 135 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2718     avg: 2755     median: 2766 (12%)     max: 2780 s
min: 2250     avg: 2300     median: 2277 (10%)     max: 2384 s
min: 2920     avg: 2941     median: 2940.5 (13%)     max: 2961 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 E1-1200 +
8000 MIPS (4%)
123%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 9610     avg: 9926     median: 9800 (5%)     max: 10530 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 E1-1200 +
6460 MFLOPS (5%)
124%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 7900     avg: 7972     median: 8000 (6%)     max: 8000 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 3.4     avg: 3.5     median: 3.6 (46%)     max: 3.6 Points
3.9 Points (50%)
3.4 Points (44%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 1347     avg: 1594     median: 1645.5 (1%)     max: 1738 Points
min: 1858     avg: 2000     median: 1993 (2%)     max: 2146 Points
min: 1544     avg: 1580     median: 1579.5 (1%)     max: 1615 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 598     avg: 602     median: 604 (2%)     max: 605 Points
122%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 682     avg: 724     median: 736 (2%)     max: 740 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
8205 Points (7%)
119%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 9739     avg: 9796     median: 9796 (8%)     max: 9853 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
596 Points (2%)
119%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 701     avg: 708     median: 708 (2%)     max: 715 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
748 Points (1%)
125%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 935     avg: 939     median: 938.5 (2%)     max: 942 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1437 Points (12%)
124%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1784     avg: 1789     median: 1788.5 (14%)     max: 1793 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1179 Points (11%)
127%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1487     avg: 1502     median: 1502 (14%)     max: 1517 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1597 Points (3%)
122%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1939     avg: 1949     median: 1948.5 (4%)     max: 1958 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1433 Points (3%)
124%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1770     avg: 1772     median: 1772 (4%)     max: 1774 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1440 Points (4%)
124%
1 E2-1800 +
min: 1775     avg: 1781     median: 1781 (5%)     max: 1787 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD E1-1200 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks AMD E2-1800 → 114% n=14

Average Benchmarks AMD E-300 → 94% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 18. 10:15:38

#0 checking url part for id 3146 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3144 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 2854 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:37:29 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.042s ... 0.043s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.043s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3146 +0.003s ... 0.046s

#8 got single benchmarks 3146 +0.017s ... 0.064s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3144 +0.003s ... 0.067s

#10 got single benchmarks 3144 +0.034s ... 0.1s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 2854 +0.002s ... 0.103s

#12 got single benchmarks 2854 +0.011s ... 0.114s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.114s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.235s ... 0.349s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.349s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)