Notebookcheck Logo

AMD E1-1200 vs AMD E-350

AMD E1-1200

► remove from comparison

The AMD E1-1200 (codename Zacate, not to be confused with the Ryzen 3 1200 from 2017) is a dual-core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It is produced on a 40 nm process and offers a relatively powerful integrated GPU and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller. Compared to the older E-300, which is based on the same chip, the E1-1200 offers a 100 MHz higher CPU clock rate.

The E1-1200 has two Bobcat cores running at 1.4 GHz (no Boost here) that can access 512 KB of L2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed.

The integrated Radeon HD 7310 GPU offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video decoder. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, an HD 7310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. The HD 7310's clock rate is 500 MHz to be very similar to the HD 6310 (488 - 500 MHz depending on the APU).

Performance

The average E1-1200 in our database is in the same league as the Celeron N2807 and the AMD E-300, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is an outrageously slow chip, as of mid 2022.

Power consumption

This E-series APU has a default TDP of 18 W, meaning an active cooling solution is pretty much a must.

The AMD E1-1200 is built with a 40 nm process for very, very, very low, as of 2022, energy efficiency.

AMD E-350

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-350 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-350 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed.

Performance

The average E-350 in our database is in the same league as the V120, E-450, E1-2500 and also the Celeron SU2300, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

The ThinkPad X121e as well as the ThinkPad X120e are among the fastest systems built around the E-350 that we know of.

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics adapter offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

ModelAMD E1-1200AMD E-350
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
CodenameZacateZacate
Series: E-Series Zacate
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-450 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1200 « 1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-240 compare1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-450 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-350 « 1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-240 compare1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock1400 MHz1600 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP18 Watt18 Watt
Technology40 nm40 nm
Die Size75 mm275 mm2
SocketFT1 (BGA413)FT1 (BGA413)
FeaturesDDR3-1066 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4ADDR3-1066/DDR3L-1066 RAM, PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 7310AMD Radeon HD 6310
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
max. Temp.90 °C

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.47     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (1%)     max: 0.54 Points
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.62 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 0.27     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (7%)     max: 0.28 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 888     avg: 906     median: 912 (6%)     max: 918 Points
min: 1029     avg: 1048     median: 1048.5 (6%)     max: 1064 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 1654     avg: 1709     median: 1682 (1%)     max: 1791 Points
min: 1887     avg: 1997     median: 2005 (1%)     max: 2080 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 1887     avg: 1909     median: 1913 (1%)     max: 1926 Points
min: 2034     avg: 2182     median: 2195.5 (2%)     max: 2250 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 984     avg: 1000     median: 1008 (1%)     max: 1008 Points
min: 1122     avg: 1140     median: 1140 (1%)     max: 1158 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 2347     avg: 2479     median: 2410 (28%)     max: 2679 s
min: 2054     avg: 2130     median: 2093 (25%)     max: 2257 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 74     avg: 78.7     median: 76 (15%)     max: 86.2 s
min: 64     avg: 68.7     median: 68.8 (14%)     max: 72.1 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 398     avg: 417.5     median: 417.5 (1%)     max: 437 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 837     avg: 872     median: 873.5 (2%)     max: 905 Points
min: 985     avg: 1016     median: 1021 (2%)     max: 1033 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 48.44     avg: 54.1     median: 57 (12%)     max: 57 s
min: 49     avg: 51.2     median: 50 (11%)     max: 61 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 110.5     avg: 120.8     median: 124 (5%)     max: 128 s
min: 109     avg: 111.6     median: 112 (5%)     max: 115 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2718     avg: 2755     median: 2766 (12%)     max: 2780 s
min: 2410     avg: 2466     median: 2460 (11%)     max: 2539 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
8000 MIPS (4%)
min: 9290     avg: 9647     median: 9790 (5%)     max: 9860 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
6460 MFLOPS (5%)
min: 7490     avg: 7520     median: 7530 (6%)     max: 7540 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 3.4     avg: 3.5     median: 3.6 (46%)     max: 3.6 Points
min: 3.7     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (49%)     max: 3.8 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 1347     avg: 1594     median: 1645.5 (1%)     max: 1738 Points
min: 1818     avg: 1933     median: 1982 (2%)     max: 1998 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 598     avg: 602     median: 604 (2%)     max: 605 Points
min: 605     avg: 638     median: 609 (2%)     max: 690 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
8205 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
596 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
748 Points (1%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1437 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1179 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1597 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1433 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1440 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks AMD E1-1200 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks AMD E-350 → 111% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 29. 07:03:19

#0 checking url part for id 3146 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1509 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.03s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3146 +0.003s ... 0.033s

#7 got single benchmarks 3146 +0.018s ... 0.051s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 1509 +0.004s ... 0.054s

#9 got single benchmarks 1509 +0.071s ... 0.125s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.125s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.155s ... 0.281s

#12 return log +0.038s ... 0.318s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)