Notebookcheck Logo

AMD E-450 vs AMD E-240 vs AMD E-350

AMD E-450

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-450 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the older E-350, the E-450 offers only 60MHz more clock speed, but a faster graphics card (thanks to Turbo Core) and DDR3-1333 and HDMI 1.4a support.

Inside the E-450 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-450 lies a bit beyond a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 6320 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6320 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E-240

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-240 (codename Zacate) is a single core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-240 one Bobcat core (the second one is deactivated) can access 512KB level 2 cache. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (AMD V-Series) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-240 should be between a 2 GHz Atom and a Celeron single core with 1.1 GHz.

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD.

AMD E-350

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-350 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-350 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed.

Performance

The average E-350 in our database is in the same league as the V120, E-450, E1-2500 and also the Celeron SU2300, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned.

The ThinkPad X121e as well as the ThinkPad X120e are among the fastest systems built around the E-350 that we know of.

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics adapter offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

show full text
ModelAMD E-450AMD E-240AMD E-350
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
CodenameZacateZacateZacate
Series: E-Series Zacate
AMD E2-20001.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-18001.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-450 « 1.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-15001.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
AMD E2-20001.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-18001.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-15001.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-240 « 1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
AMD E2-20001.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-18001.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-350 « 1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-15001.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock1650 MHz1500 MHz1600 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB64 KB
L2 Cache1 MB512 KB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 21 / 12 / 2
TDP18 Watt18 Watt18 Watt
Technology40 nm40 nm40 nm
Die Size75 mm275 mm275 mm2
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 (BGA413)
FeaturesMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VDDR3-1066/DDR3L-1066 RAM, PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
max. Temp.90 °C
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 6310
Manufacturerwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.55     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.64 Points
0.3 Points (0%)
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.62 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.31     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (8%)     max: 0.33 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 665     avg: 1013     median: 1062.5 (6%)     max: 1077 Points
min: 891     avg: 938     median: 937.5 (6%)     max: 984 Points
min: 1029     avg: 1048     median: 1048.5 (6%)     max: 1064 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 1568     avg: 1961     median: 2020.5 (1%)     max: 2082 Points
99%
1 E-350 +
min: 1887     avg: 1997     median: 2005 (1%)     max: 2080 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 1968     avg: 2204     median: 2216.5 (2%)     max: 2299 Points
99%
1 E-350 +
min: 2034     avg: 2182     median: 2195.5 (2%)     max: 2250 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 1011     avg: 1137     median: 1170.5 (1%)     max: 1180 Points
min: 988     avg: 1016     median: 1015.5 (1%)     max: 1043 Points
min: 1122     avg: 1140     median: 1140 (1%)     max: 1158 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 2006     avg: 2017     median: 2021 (24%)     max: 2025 s
4472 s (53%)
min: 2054     avg: 2130     median: 2093 (25%)     max: 2257 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 62     avg: 65.2     median: 64.5 (13%)     max: 69.6 s
137.4 s (28%)
min: 64     avg: 68.7     median: 68.8 (14%)     max: 72.1 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 485     avg: 491     median: 489 (1%)     max: 499 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 E-450 +
2.9 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 E-450 +
16.2 fps (4%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.05     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.0511 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.072     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (1%)     max: 0.0747 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.0889     avg: 0.4     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.94 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1004     avg: 1030     median: 1034.5 (2%)     max: 1070 Points
min: 497     avg: 501     median: 500.5 (1%)     max: 504 Points
min: 985     avg: 1016     median: 1021 (2%)     max: 1033 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 47     avg: 47.7     median: 47.5 (10%)     max: 48.69 s
57.5 s (12%)
min: 49     avg: 51.2     median: 50 (11%)     max: 61 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 105     avg: 107.1     median: 107.4 (5%)     max: 109 s
120.3 s (5%)
min: 109     avg: 111.6     median: 112 (5%)     max: 115 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 2334     avg: 2364     median: 2369 (11%)     max: 2384 s
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 2410     avg: 2466     median: 2460 (11%)     max: 2539 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
9480 MIPS (4%)
min: 3750     avg: 4097     median: 4270 (2%)     max: 4270 MIPS
min: 9290     avg: 9647     median: 9790 (5%)     max: 9860 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
7530 MFLOPS (6%)
min: 3520     avg: 3730     median: 3520 (3%)     max: 4150 MFLOPS
min: 7490     avg: 7520     median: 7530 (6%)     max: 7540 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 E-450 +
3310 Points (7%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 3.8     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (50%)     max: 3.9 Points
2.5 Points (32%)
min: 3.7     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (49%)     max: 3.8 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 1625     avg: 1864     median: 1892 (2%)     max: 2123 Points
105%
1 E-350 +
min: 1818     avg: 1933     median: 1982 (2%)     max: 1998 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 587     avg: 681     median: 703 (2%)     max: 721 Points
269 Points (1%)
min: 605     avg: 638     median: 609 (2%)     max: 690 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD E-450 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks AMD E-240 → 67% n=12

Average Benchmarks AMD E-350 → 98% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 19. 13:45:21

#0 checking url part for id 2852 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1511 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1509 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.069s ... 0.071s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.071s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 2852 +0.003s ... 0.073s

#8 got single benchmarks 2852 +0.037s ... 0.111s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1511 +0.003s ... 0.113s

#10 got single benchmarks 1511 +0.011s ... 0.125s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 1509 +0.003s ... 0.127s

#12 got single benchmarks 1509 +0.061s ... 0.189s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.189s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.169s ... 0.357s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.357s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)