AMD E-350 vs AMD E2-2000 vs AMD E1-1200

AMD E-350

► remove

The AMD E-350 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-350 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-350 lies a bit beyond a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E2-2000

► remove

The AMD E2-2000 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the older E2-1800 offers only slightly higher CPU (50 MHz) and GPU (15 - 20 MHz) clock rates.

Inside the E2-2000 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E2-2000 is a bit below a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 7340 graphics card offers 80 shaders, clocked at 538 - 700 MHz, and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD7340 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 W by AMD. That's about the same level as Intels (significantly faster) ULV CPUs.

AMD E1-1200

► remove

The AMD E1-1200 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller. Compared to the old E-300, which is based on the same chip, the E1-1200 offers a 100 MHz higher CPU clock rate.

Inside the E1-1200 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-300 lies a bit beyond a Athlon X2 L310 at 1.2 GHz

The integrated Radeon HD 7310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD7310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. In the E1-1200 the 7310 is clocked at 500 MHz and therefore not much different to the HD 6310 (488 - 500 MHz depending on the APU).

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E-350AMD E2-2000AMD E1-1200
AMD E-SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
ZacateZacateZacate
: E-Series Zacate
AMD E2-20001750 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-18001700 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-4501650 MHz2 / 2
» AMD E-3501600 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-15001480 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-12001400 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3001300 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-2401500 MHz1 / 1
» AMD E2-20001750 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-18001700 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-4501650 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3501600 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-15001480 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-12001400 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3001300 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-2401500 MHz1 / 1
AMD E2-20001750 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-18001700 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-4501650 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3501600 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-15001480 MHz2 / 2
» AMD E1-12001400 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3001300 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-2401500 MHz1 / 1
1600 MHz1750 MHz1400 MHz
128 KB128 KB128 KB
1 MB1 MB1 MB
2 / 22 / 22 / 2
18 18 18
40 40 40
75 mm275 mm275 mm2
FT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-Ball
MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 6310

Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.62 Points
min: 0.47     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (1%)     max: 0.54 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 0.27     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (11%)     max: 0.28 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 1029     avg: 1048     median: 1048.5 (11%)     max: 1064 Points
min: 888     avg: 906     median: 912 (9%)     max: 918 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 1887     avg: 1997     median: 2005 (3%)     max: 2080 Points
min: 1654     avg: 1709     median: 1682 (3%)     max: 1791 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 2034     avg: 2182     median: 2195.5 (3%)     max: 2250 Points
min: 1887     avg: 1909     median: 1913 (2%)     max: 1926 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 1122     avg: 1140     median: 1140 (11%)     max: 1158 Points
min: 984     avg: 1000     median: 1008 (9%)     max: 1008 Points
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m *
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 2054     avg: 2130     median: 2093 (25%)     max: 2257.48 seconds
min: 2347     avg: 2479     median: 2410 (28%)     max: 2678.85 seconds
wPrime 2.10 - 32m *
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 64     avg: 68.7     median: 68.8 (14%)     max: 72.09 seconds
min: 74     avg: 78.7     median: 76 (15%)     max: 86.187 seconds
WinRAR - Result
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 398     avg: 418     median: 417.5 (4%)     max: 437 KB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - CPU Score
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 985     avg: 1016     median: 1021 (7%)     max: 1033 Points
min: 837     avg: 872     median: 873.5 (6%)     max: 905 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M *
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 49     avg: 51.2     median: 50 (11%)     max: 61 Seconds
min: 48.435     avg: 54.1     median: 57 (12%)     max: 57 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M *
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 109     avg: 112     median: 112 (5%)     max: 115 Seconds
min: 110.502     avg: 121     median: 124 (5%)     max: 128 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M *
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 2409.83     avg: 2466     median: 2460 (11%)     max: 2539 Seconds
min: 2717.76     avg: 2755     median: 2766 (12%)     max: 2780 Seconds
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - Dhrystone
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 9290     avg: 9647     median: 9790 (5%)     max: 9860 MIPS
8000 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - Whetstone
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 7490     avg: 7520     median: 7530 (6%)     max: 7540 MFLOPS
6460 MFLOPS (5%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Processor
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 3.7     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (49%)     max: 3.8 points
min: 3.4     avg: 3.5     median: 3.6 (46%)     max: 3.6 points
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 1818     avg: 1933     median: 1982 (3%)     max: 1998 Points
min: 1347     avg: 1594     median: 1645.5 (2%)     max: 1738 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 605     avg: 638     median: 609 (3%)     max: 690 points
min: 598     avg: 602     median: 604 (3%)     max: 605 points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
100%
1 E1-1200 +
8205 Points (5%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
100%
1 E1-1200 +
596 Points (2%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
100%
1 E1-1200 +
748 Points (2%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1437 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1179 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1597 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1433 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1440 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks AMD E-350 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD E1-1200 → NAN% n=

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.14
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)