AMD E-350 vs AMD E2-2000 vs AMD E-240

AMD E-350

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-350 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-350 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-350 lies a bit beyond a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E2-2000

► remove from comparison

The AMD E2-2000 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the older E2-1800 offers only slightly higher CPU (50 MHz) and GPU (15 - 20 MHz) clock rates.

Inside the E2-2000 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E2-2000 is a bit below a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 7340 graphics card offers 80 shaders, clocked at 538 - 700 MHz, and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD7340 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 W by AMD. That's about the same level as Intels (significantly faster) ULV CPUs.

AMD E-240

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-240 (codename Zacate) is a single core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-240 one Bobcat core (the second one is deactivated) can access 512KB level 2 cache. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (AMD V-Series) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-240 should be between a 2 GHz Atom and a Celeron single core with 1.1 GHz.

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD.

AMD E-350AMD E2-2000AMD E-240
AMD E-SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
ZacateZacateZacate
Series: E-Series Zacate
AMD E2-20001.75 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-18001.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E-3501.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-15001.48 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-3001.3 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1
» AMD E2-20001.75 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-18001.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-3501.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-15001.48 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-3001.3 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1
AMD E2-20001.75 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-18001.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-3501.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-15001.48 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-3001.3 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1
1600 MHz1750 MHz1500 MHz
128 KB128 KB64 KB
1 MB1 MB512 KB
2 / 22 / 21 / 1
18 18 18
40 40 40
75 mm275 mm275 mm2
FT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-Ball
MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 6310
Architecturex86x86x86

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.62 Points
43%
1 E-240 +
0.3 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 1029     avg: 1048     median: 1048.5 (9%)     max: 1064
89%
1 E-240 +
min: 891     avg: 938     median: 937.5 (8%)     max: 984
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 1887     avg: 1997     median: 2005 (3%)     max: 2080
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 2034     avg: 2182     median: 2195.5 (2%)     max: 2250 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 1122     avg: 1140     median: 1140 (8%)     max: 1158 Points
89%
1 E-240 +
min: 988     avg: 1016     median: 1015.5 (7%)     max: 1043 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 2054     avg: 2130     median: 2093 (25%)     max: 2257.48 s
63%
1 E-240 +
4472 s (53%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 64     avg: 68.7     median: 68.8 (14%)     max: 72.09 s
84%
1 E-240 +
137 s (28%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 985     avg: 1016     median: 1021 (6%)     max: 1033 Points
49%
1 E-240 +
min: 497     avg: 501     median: 500.5 (3%)     max: 504 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 49     avg: 51.2     median: 50 (11%)     max: 61 s
98%
1 E-240 +
57.5 s (12%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 109     avg: 112     median: 112 (5%)     max: 115 s
100%
1 E-240 +
120 s (5%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 2409.83     avg: 2466     median: 2460 (11%)     max: 2539 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 9290     avg: 9647     median: 9790 (5%)     max: 9860 MIPS
44%
1 E-240 +
min: 3750     avg: 4097     median: 4270 (2%)     max: 4270 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 7490     avg: 7520     median: 7530 (6%)     max: 7540 MFLOPS
47%
1 E-240 +
min: 3520     avg: 3730     median: 3520 (3%)     max: 4150 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 3.7     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (49%)     max: 3.8 Points
66%
1 E-240 +
2.5 Points (32%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 1818     avg: 1933     median: 1982 (2%)     max: 1998 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 E-350 +
min: 605     avg: 638     median: 609 (2%)     max: 690 Points
44%
1 E-240 +
269 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks AMD E-350 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD E-240 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)