, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD E-350 vs AMD E1-1200

AMD E-350

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-350 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-350 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-350 lies a bit beyond a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E1-1200

► remove from comparison

The AMD E1-1200 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller. Compared to the old E-300, which is based on the same chip, the E1-1200 offers a 100 MHz higher CPU clock rate.

Inside the E1-1200 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-300 lies a bit beyond a Athlon X2 L310 at 1.2 GHz

The integrated Radeon HD 7310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD7310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. In the E1-1200 the 7310 is clocked at 500 MHz and therefore not much different to the HD 6310 (488 - 500 MHz depending on the APU).

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E-350AMD E1-1200
AMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
ZacateZacate
Series: E-Series Zacate
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-450 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E-3501.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-240 compare1.5 GHz1 / 1
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-450 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-3501.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-240 compare1.5 GHz1 / 1
1600 MHz1400 MHz
128 KB128 KB
1 MB1 MB
2 / 22 / 2
18 18
40 40
75 mm275 mm2
FT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-Ball
MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 6310
Architecturex86x86

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.59     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.62 Points
min: 0.47     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (1%)     max: 0.54 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 0.27     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (9%)     max: 0.28 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1029     avg: 1048     median: 1048.5 (9%)     max: 1064
min: 888     avg: 906     median: 912 (8%)     max: 918
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 1887     avg: 1997     median: 2005 (3%)     max: 2080
min: 1654     avg: 1709     median: 1682 (3%)     max: 1791
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 2034     avg: 2182     median: 2195.5 (2%)     max: 2250 Points
min: 1887     avg: 1909     median: 1913 (2%)     max: 1926 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 1122     avg: 1140     median: 1140 (8%)     max: 1158 Points
min: 984     avg: 1000     median: 1008 (7%)     max: 1008 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 2054     avg: 2130     median: 2093 (25%)     max: 2257.48 s
min: 2347     avg: 2479     median: 2410 (28%)     max: 2678.85 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 64     avg: 68.7     median: 68.8 (14%)     max: 72.09 s
min: 74     avg: 78.7     median: 76 (15%)     max: 86.187 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 398     avg: 418     median: 417.5 (3%)     max: 437
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 985     avg: 1016     median: 1021 (6%)     max: 1033 Points
min: 837     avg: 872     median: 873.5 (5%)     max: 905 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 49     avg: 51.2     median: 50 (11%)     max: 61 s
min: 48.435     avg: 54.1     median: 57 (12%)     max: 57 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 109     avg: 112     median: 112 (5%)     max: 115 s
min: 110.502     avg: 121     median: 124 (5%)     max: 128 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2409.83     avg: 2466     median: 2460 (11%)     max: 2539 s
min: 2717.76     avg: 2755     median: 2766 (12%)     max: 2780 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 9290     avg: 9647     median: 9790 (5%)     max: 9860 MIPS
8000 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 7490     avg: 7520     median: 7530 (6%)     max: 7540 MFLOPS
6460 MFLOPS (5%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 3.7     avg: 3.8     median: 3.8 (49%)     max: 3.8 Points
min: 3.4     avg: 3.5     median: 3.6 (46%)     max: 3.6 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 1818     avg: 1933     median: 1982 (2%)     max: 1998 Points
min: 1347     avg: 1594     median: 1645.5 (2%)     max: 1738 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 605     avg: 638     median: 609 (2%)     max: 690 Points
min: 598     avg: 602     median: 604 (2%)     max: 605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
8205 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
596 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
748 Points (2%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1437 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1179 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1597 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1433 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1440 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks AMD E-350 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks AMD E1-1200 → 91% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 07. 18:58:16

#0 checking url part for id 1509 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3146 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 03 May 2021 13:07:39 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 1509 +0s ... 0.006s

#7 got single benchmarks 1509 +0.032s ... 0.039s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3146 +0s ... 0.039s

#9 got single benchmarks 3146 +0.011s ... 0.05s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.05s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.067s

#12 return log +0.024s ... 0.091s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)