AMD E-300 vs AMD E1-1500 vs AMD E2-1800

AMD E-300

► remove

The AMD E-300 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-300 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-300 lies a bit beyond a Athlon X2 L310 at 1.2 GHz

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. Furthermore, the E-300 also support HTMI 1.4a.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E1-1500

► remove

The AMD E1-1500 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the old E1-1200, which is based on the same chip, the E1-1500 offers an 80 MHz higher CPU and 29 MHz higher GPU clock rate.

Inside the E1-1500 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E1-1500 is a bit below an Athlon X2 L310 at 1.2 GHz

The integrated Radeon HD 7310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD7310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. In the E1-1500 the 7310 is clocked at 529 MHz and therefore not much different to the HD 6310 (488 - 500 MHz depending on the APU).

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 W by AMD. That's similar to Intels (faster) Ivy and Sandy Bridge ULV-CPUs.

AMD E2-1800

► remove

The AMD E2-1800 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the older E-450, the E2-1800 offers only slightly higher CPU (50 MHz)  and GPU (20-80 MHz) clock rates.

Inside the E2-1800 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-450 lies a bit beyond a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 7340 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD7340 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. The difference to the older 6320 in the E-450 is a 20-80MHz higher clock rate.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E-300AMD E1-1500AMD E2-1800
AMD E-SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
ZacateZacateZacate
: E-Series Zacate
AMD E2-20001750 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-18001700 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-4501650 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3501600 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-15001480 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-12001400 MHz2 / 2
» AMD E-3001300 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-2401500 MHz1 / 1
AMD E2-20001750 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-18001700 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-4501650 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3501600 MHz2 / 2
» AMD E1-15001480 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-12001400 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3001300 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-2401500 MHz1 / 1
AMD E2-20001750 MHz2 / 2
» AMD E2-18001700 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-4501650 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3501600 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-15001480 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-12001400 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3001300 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-2401500 MHz1 / 1
1300 MHz1480 MHz1700 MHz
128 KB128 KB128 KB
1 MB1 MB1 MB
2 / 22 / 22 / 2
18 18 18
40 40 40
75 mm275 mm275 mm2
FT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-Ball
MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 6310

Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
0.5 Points (1%)
0.6 Points (1%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
0.3 Points (13%)
0.3 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
853 Points (9%)
min: 997     avg: 1093.4     median: 1110 (12%)     max: 1128 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
1176 Points (2%)
min: 2068     avg: 2115.3     median: 2121 (3%)     max: 2147 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
min: 1714     avg: 1761.5     median: 1761 (2%)     max: 1809 Points
min: 2245     avg: 2312.2     median: 2321 (3%)     max: 2374 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
min: 899     avg: 920     median: 920 (9%)     max: 941 Points
min: 1099     avg: 1191.8     median: 1208 (12%)     max: 1226 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
2511 seconds (30%)
min: 1900     avg: 2125.8     median: 2151 (25%)     max: 2380 seconds
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
79 seconds (16%)
min: 60     avg: 67.2     median: 69 (14%)     max: 72 seconds
WinRAR - Result
min: 456     avg: 482.3     median: 486 (6%)     max: 505 KB/s
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
3.3 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
18.3 fps (7%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 836     avg: 838.5     median: 838 (6%)     max: 841 Points
min: 527     avg: 1025.2     median: 1082 (7%)     max: 1124 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 59     avg: 59.5     median: 59 (13%)     max: 60 Seconds
min: 45     avg: 46.7     median: 46 (10%)     max: 48 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 132     avg: 133.5     median: 133 (6%)     max: 135 Seconds
min: 101     avg: 105     median: 103 (4%)     max: 114 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2920     avg: 2940.5     median: 2940 (13%)     max: 2961 Seconds
min: 2250     avg: 2300     median: 2277 (10%)     max: 2383 Seconds
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 9610     avg: 9926     median: 9800 (5%)     max: 10530 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 7900     avg: 7972     median: 8000 (6%)     max: 8000 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Processor
3.4 points (49%)
3.9 points (56%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
min: 1544     avg: 1579.5     median: 1579 (2%)     max: 1615 Points
min: 1858     avg: 1999.6     median: 1993 (3%)     max: 2146 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
min: 682     avg: 724.3     median: 736 (4%)     max: 740 points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 9739     avg: 9796     median: 9796 (6%)     max: 9853 Points
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 701     avg: 708     median: 708 (2%)     max: 715 Points
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
min: 935     avg: 938.5     median: 938 (3%)     max: 942 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
min: 1784     avg: 1788.5     median: 1788 (14%)     max: 1793 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
min: 1487     avg: 1502     median: 1502 (14%)     max: 1517 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
min: 1939     avg: 1948.5     median: 1948 (3%)     max: 1958 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
min: 1770     avg: 1772     median: 1772 (3%)     max: 1774 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
min: 1775     avg: 1781     median: 1781 (4%)     max: 1787 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD E-300 → 100%

Average Benchmarks AMD E2-1800 → 109%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)