AMD E-300 vs AMD E1-1500 vs AMD E-240

AMD E-300

► remove

The AMD E-300 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-300 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-300 lies a bit beyond a Athlon X2 L310 at 1.2 GHz

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. Furthermore, the E-300 also support HTMI 1.4a.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E1-1500

► remove

The AMD E1-1500 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the old E1-1200, which is based on the same chip, the E1-1500 offers an 80 MHz higher CPU and 29 MHz higher GPU clock rate.

Inside the E1-1500 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E1-1500 is a bit below an Athlon X2 L310 at 1.2 GHz

The integrated Radeon HD 7310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD7310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. In the E1-1500 the 7310 is clocked at 529 MHz and therefore not much different to the HD 6310 (488 - 500 MHz depending on the APU).

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 W by AMD. That's similar to Intels (faster) Ivy and Sandy Bridge ULV-CPUs.

AMD E-240

► remove

The AMD E-240 (codename Zacate) is a single core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-240 one Bobcat core (the second one is deactivated) can access 512KB level 2 cache. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (AMD V-Series) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-240 should be between a 2 GHz Atom and a Celeron single core with 1.1 GHz.

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD.

AMD E-300AMD E1-1500AMD E-240
AMD E-SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
ZacateZacateZacate
: E-Series Zacate
AMD E2-20001750 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-18001700 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-4501650 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3501600 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-15001480 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-12001400 MHz2 / 2
» AMD E-3001300 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-2401500 MHz1 / 1
AMD E2-20001750 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-18001700 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-4501650 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3501600 MHz2 / 2
» AMD E1-15001480 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-12001400 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3001300 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-2401500 MHz1 / 1
AMD E2-20001750 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-18001700 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-4501650 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3501600 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-15001480 MHz2 / 2
AMD E1-12001400 MHz2 / 2
AMD E-3001300 MHz2 / 2
» AMD E-2401500 MHz1 / 1
1300 MHz1480 MHz1500 MHz
128 KB128 KB64 KB
1 MB1 MB512 KB
2 / 22 / 21 / 1
18 18 18
40 40 40
75 mm275 mm275 mm2
FT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-Ball
MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 6310

Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
0.5 Points (1%)
0.3 Points (1%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
0.3 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
853 Points (9%)
min: 891     avg: 937.5     median: 937 (10%)     max: 984 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
1176 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
min: 1714     avg: 1761.5     median: 1761 (2%)     max: 1809 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
min: 899     avg: 920     median: 920 (9%)     max: 941 Points
min: 988     avg: 1015.5     median: 1015 (10%)     max: 1043 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
2511 seconds (30%)
4471.7 seconds (53%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
79 seconds (16%)
137.4 seconds (28%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 836     avg: 838.5     median: 838 (6%)     max: 841 Points
min: 497     avg: 500.5     median: 500 (3%)     max: 504 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 59     avg: 59.5     median: 59 (13%)     max: 60 Seconds
57.5 Seconds (12%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 132     avg: 133.5     median: 133 (6%)     max: 135 Seconds
120.3 Seconds (5%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2920     avg: 2940.5     median: 2940 (13%)     max: 2961 Seconds
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 3750     avg: 4096.7     median: 4270 (2%)     max: 4270 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 3520     avg: 3730     median: 3520 (3%)     max: 4150 MFLOPS
Windows 7 Experience Index - Processor
3.4 points (49%)
2.5 points (36%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
min: 1544     avg: 1579.5     median: 1579 (2%)     max: 1615 Points
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
269 points (1%)

Average Benchmarks AMD E-300 → 100%

Average Benchmarks AMD E-240 → 91%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)