, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD E-240 vs AMD E1-1200

AMD E-240

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-240 (codename Zacate) is a single core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-240 one Bobcat core (the second one is deactivated) can access 512KB level 2 cache. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (AMD V-Series) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-240 should be between a 2 GHz Atom and a Celeron single core with 1.1 GHz.

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD.

AMD E1-1200

► remove from comparison

The AMD E1-1200 (codename Zacate, not to be confused with the Ryzen 3 1200 from 2017) is a dual-core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It is produced on a 40 nm process and offers a relatively powerful integrated GPU and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller. Compared to the older E-300, which is based on the same chip, the E1-1200 offers a 100 MHz higher CPU clock rate.

The E1-1200 has two Bobcat cores running at 1.4 GHz (no Boost here) that can access 512 KB of L2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. The CPU should have no trouble outperforming an Athlon X2 L310 (1.2 GHz).

The integrated Radeon HD 7310 GPU offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video decoder. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, an HD 7310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. The HD 7310's clock rate is 500 MHz to be very similar to the HD 6310 (488 - 500 MHz depending on the APU).

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air running Windows 7.

AMD E-240AMD E1-1200
AMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
ZacateZacate
Series: E-Series Zacate
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-450 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-350 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-450 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-350 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1
1500 MHz1400 MHz
64 KB128 KB
512 KB1 MB
1 / 12 / 2
18 18
40 40
75 mm275 mm2
FT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-Ball
MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
Architecturex86x86

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
0.3 Points (0%)
min: 0.47     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (1%)     max: 0.54 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 0.27     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (9%)     max: 0.28 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 891     avg: 938     median: 937.5 (8%)     max: 984
min: 888     avg: 906     median: 912 (8%)     max: 918
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 1654     avg: 1709     median: 1682 (3%)     max: 1791
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 1887     avg: 1909     median: 1913 (2%)     max: 1926 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 988     avg: 1016     median: 1015.5 (7%)     max: 1043 Points
min: 984     avg: 1000     median: 1008 (7%)     max: 1008 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
4472 s (53%)
min: 2347     avg: 2479     median: 2410 (28%)     max: 2678.85 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
137 s (28%)
min: 74     avg: 78.7     median: 76 (15%)     max: 86.187 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 398     avg: 418     median: 417.5 (3%)     max: 437
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 497     avg: 501     median: 500.5 (3%)     max: 504 Points
min: 837     avg: 872     median: 873.5 (5%)     max: 905 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
57.5 s (12%)
min: 48.435     avg: 54.1     median: 57 (12%)     max: 57 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
120 s (5%)
min: 110.502     avg: 121     median: 124 (5%)     max: 128 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 2717.76     avg: 2755     median: 2766 (12%)     max: 2780 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 3750     avg: 4097     median: 4270 (2%)     max: 4270 MIPS
8000 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 3520     avg: 3730     median: 3520 (3%)     max: 4150 MFLOPS
6460 MFLOPS (5%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
2.5 Points (32%)
min: 3.4     avg: 3.5     median: 3.6 (46%)     max: 3.6 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 1347     avg: 1594     median: 1645.5 (2%)     max: 1738 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
269 Points (1%)
min: 598     avg: 602     median: 604 (2%)     max: 605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
8205 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
596 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
748 Points (2%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1437 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1179 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1597 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1433 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1440 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks AMD E-240 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks AMD E1-1200 → 148% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 21. 11:24:45

#0 checking url part for id 1511 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3146 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:09:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 1511 +0s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 1511 +0.008s ... 0.016s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3146 +0s ... 0.017s

#9 got single benchmarks 3146 +0.011s ... 0.028s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.028s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.042s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.045s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)