Notebookcheck Logo

AMD E-240 vs AMD E1-1200 vs AMD E-300

AMD E-240

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-240 (codename Zacate) is a single core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-240 one Bobcat core (the second one is deactivated) can access 512KB level 2 cache. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (AMD V-Series) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-240 should be between a 2 GHz Atom and a Celeron single core with 1.1 GHz.

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD.

AMD E1-1200

► remove from comparison

The AMD E1-1200 (codename Zacate, not to be confused with the Ryzen 3 1200 from 2017) is a dual-core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It is produced on a 40 nm process and offers a relatively powerful integrated GPU and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller. Compared to the older E-300, which is based on the same chip, the E1-1200 offers a 100 MHz higher CPU clock rate.

The E1-1200 has two Bobcat cores running at 1.4 GHz (no Boost here) that can access 512 KB of L2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed.

The integrated Radeon HD 7310 GPU offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video decoder. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, an HD 7310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. The HD 7310's clock rate is 500 MHz to be very similar to the HD 6310 (488 - 500 MHz depending on the APU).

Performance

The average E1-1200 in our database is in the same league as the Celeron N2807 and the AMD E-300, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is an outrageously slow chip, as of mid 2022.

Power consumption

This E-series APU has a default TDP of 18 W, meaning an active cooling solution is pretty much a must.

The AMD E1-1200 is built with a 40 nm process for very, very, very low, as of 2022, energy efficiency.

AMD E-300

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-300 (codename Zacate) is a low-end dual-core processor designed for the smaller laptops and netbooks. The E-series processor has a relatively fast iGPU and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

An E-300 has two Bobcat processor cores running at 1.3 GHz, each with the access to 512 KB of Level 2 cache (1 M in total). In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an out-of-order execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed.

The Radeon HD 6310 iGPU has 80 unified shaders and an UVD3 video processing engine. The iGPU has no trouble outshining the Intel GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, and it does not lag behind the Nvidia ION, either. The Radeon has support for HDMI 1.4a video output.

Performance

The average E-300 in our database is in the same league as the A4-1250, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. Which isn't a great result. This is a fairly slow chip, as of mid 2022; expect to see plenty of slowdowns no matter what it is that you are currently doing.

Power consumption

This APU has a default TDP of 18 W, meaning an active cooling solution is a must.

The AMD E-300 is manufactured on a 32 nm process leading to really, really low, as of 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD E-240AMD E1-1200AMD E-300
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
CodenameZacateZacateZacate
Series: E-Series Zacate
AMD E2-20001.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-18001.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-15001.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-240 « 1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
AMD E2-20001.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-18001.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-15001.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1200 « 1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
AMD E2-20001.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-18001.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-3501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-15001.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-12001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-300 « 1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock1500 MHz1400 MHz1300 MHz
L1 Cache64 KB128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 12 / 22 / 2
TDP18 Watt18 Watt18 Watt
Technology40 nm40 nm32 nm
Die Size75 mm275 mm275 mm2
SocketFT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 (BGA413)FT1 (BGA413)
FeaturesMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VDDR3-1066 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4ADDR3-1066 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 2 [?], MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SVM
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 7310AMD Radeon HD 6310
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
0.3 Points (0%)
min: 0.47     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (1%)     max: 0.54 Points
min: 0.46     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (1%)     max: 0.5 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 0.27     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (7%)     max: 0.28 Points
93%
1 E-300 +
min: 0.24     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (6%)     max: 0.26 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 891     avg: 938     median: 937.5 (6%)     max: 984 Points
min: 888     avg: 906     median: 912 (6%)     max: 918 Points
853 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 1654     avg: 1709     median: 1682 (1%)     max: 1791 Points
70%
1 E-300 +
1176 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 1887     avg: 1909     median: 1913 (1%)     max: 1926 Points
92%
1 E-300 +
min: 1714     avg: 1762     median: 1761.5 (1%)     max: 1809 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 988     avg: 1016     median: 1015.5 (1%)     max: 1043 Points
min: 984     avg: 1000     median: 1008 (1%)     max: 1008 Points
min: 899     avg: 920     median: 920 (1%)     max: 941 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
4472 s (53%)
min: 2347     avg: 2479     median: 2410 (28%)     max: 2679 s
2511 s (30%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
137.4 s (28%)
min: 74     avg: 78.7     median: 76 (15%)     max: 86.2 s
79 s (16%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 398     avg: 417.5     median: 417.5 (1%)     max: 437 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 497     avg: 501     median: 500.5 (1%)     max: 504 Points
min: 837     avg: 872     median: 873.5 (2%)     max: 905 Points
min: 836     avg: 839     median: 838.5 (2%)     max: 841 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
57.5 s (12%)
min: 48.44     avg: 54.1     median: 57 (12%)     max: 57 s
min: 59     avg: 59.5     median: 59.5 (13%)     max: 60 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
120.3 s (5%)
min: 110.5     avg: 120.8     median: 124 (5%)     max: 128 s
min: 132     avg: 133.5     median: 133.5 (6%)     max: 135 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 2718     avg: 2755     median: 2766 (12%)     max: 2780 s
99%
1 E-300 +
min: 2920     avg: 2941     median: 2940.5 (13%)     max: 2961 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 E-240 +
min: 3750     avg: 4097     median: 4270 (2%)     max: 4270 MIPS
187%
1 E1-1200 +
8000 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 E-240 +
min: 3520     avg: 3730     median: 3520 (3%)     max: 4150 MFLOPS
184%
1 E1-1200 +
6460 MFLOPS (5%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
2.5 Points (32%)
min: 3.4     avg: 3.5     median: 3.6 (46%)     max: 3.6 Points
3.4 Points (44%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 1347     avg: 1594     median: 1645.5 (1%)     max: 1738 Points
96%
1 E-300 +
min: 1544     avg: 1580     median: 1579.5 (1%)     max: 1615 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 E-240 +
269 Points (1%)
225%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 598     avg: 602     median: 604 (2%)     max: 605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
8205 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
596 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
748 Points (1%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1437 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1179 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1597 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1433 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1440 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks AMD E-240 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks AMD E1-1200 → 132% n=9

Average Benchmarks AMD E-300 → 126% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 28. 13:56:19

#0 checking url part for id 1511 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3146 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 2854 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.025s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1511 +0.003s ... 0.027s

#8 got single benchmarks 1511 +0.014s ... 0.041s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3146 +0.003s ... 0.044s

#10 got single benchmarks 3146 +0.017s ... 0.061s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 2854 +0.003s ... 0.064s

#12 got single benchmarks 2854 +0.011s ... 0.075s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.075s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.16s ... 0.235s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.235s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)