, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD E-240 vs AMD E-450

AMD E-240

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-240 (codename Zacate) is a single core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller.

Inside the E-240 one Bobcat core (the second one is deactivated) can access 512KB level 2 cache. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (AMD V-Series) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-240 should be between a 2 GHz Atom and a Celeron single core with 1.1 GHz.

The integrated Radeon HD 6310 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD.

AMD E-450

► remove from comparison

The AMD E-450 (codename Zacate) is a dual core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It offers a relatively powerful integrated graphics card and a single channel DDR3-1333 memory controller. Compared to the older E-350, the E-450 offers only 60MHz more clock speed, but a faster graphics card (thanks to Turbo Core) and DDR3-1333 and HDMI 1.4a support.

Inside the E-450 two Bobcat cores can access 512KB level 2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed. However, the performance is far worse than similar clocked Penryn (Celeron) or Danube (Athlon II) cores. On average the cpu performance of the E-450 lies a bit beyond a Celeron SU2300 at 1.2 GHz or a Athlon II Neo K325 at 1.3 GHz. 

The integrated Radeon HD 6320 graphics card offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video processor. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, the HD6320 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution.

The power consumption is rated with a TDP of 18 Watt by AMD. According to first reviews of Brazos prototypes the power consumption was between 11 to 29 Watt. This would be on a level of a (much more powerful) 11" MacBook Air using Windows 7.

AMD E-240AMD E-450
AMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
ZacateZacate
Series: E-Series Zacate
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-350 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1200 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E-4501.65 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-350 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-1200 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
AMD E-2401.5 GHz1 / 1
1500 MHz1650 MHz
64 KB128 KB
512 KB1 MB
1 / 12 / 2
18 18
40 40
75 mm275 mm2
FT1 BGA 413-BallFT1 BGA 413-Ball
MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-VMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
Architecturex86x86

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
0.3 Points (0%)
min: 0.55     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.64 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.31     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (10%)     max: 0.33 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 891     avg: 938     median: 937.5 (8%)     max: 984
min: 665     avg: 1013     median: 1062.5 (9%)     max: 1077
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 1568     avg: 1961     median: 2020.5 (3%)     max: 2082
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 1968     avg: 2204     median: 2216.5 (2%)     max: 2299 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 988     avg: 1016     median: 1015.5 (7%)     max: 1043 Points
min: 1011     avg: 1137     median: 1170.5 (8%)     max: 1180 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
4472 s (53%)
min: 2006     avg: 2017     median: 2021 (24%)     max: 2025 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
137 s (28%)
min: 62     avg: 65.2     median: 64.5 (13%)     max: 69.623 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 485     avg: 491     median: 489 (3%)     max: 499
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 E-450 +
2.9 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 E-450 +
16.2 fps (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.05     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (2%)     max: 0.0511 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.072     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (2%)     max: 0.0747 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 0.0889     avg: 0.4     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.94 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 497     avg: 501     median: 500.5 (3%)     max: 504 Points
min: 1004     avg: 1030     median: 1034.5 (6%)     max: 1070 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
57.5 s (12%)
min: 47     avg: 47.7     median: 47.5 (10%)     max: 48.688 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
120 s (5%)
min: 105     avg: 107     median: 107.4 (5%)     max: 109 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 2334     avg: 2364     median: 2369 (11%)     max: 2384 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 3750     avg: 4097     median: 4270 (2%)     max: 4270 MIPS
9480 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 3520     avg: 3730     median: 3520 (3%)     max: 4150 MFLOPS
7530 MFLOPS (6%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 E-450 +
3310 Points (21%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
2.5 Points (32%)
min: 3.8     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (50%)     max: 3.9 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 E-450 +
min: 1625     avg: 1864     median: 1892 (2%)     max: 2123 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
269 Points (1%)
min: 587     avg: 681     median: 703 (3%)     max: 721 Points

Average Benchmarks AMD E-240 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks AMD E-450 → 168% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 20. 20:34:12

#0 checking url part for id 1511 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2852 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:09:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 1511 +0s ... 0.006s

#7 got single benchmarks 1511 +0.008s ... 0.015s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 2852 +0s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 2852 +0.021s ... 0.036s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.05s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.054s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)