Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Xeon E-2176M vs Intel Core i5-8400H

Intel Xeon E-2176M

► remove from comparison Intel E-2176M

The Intel Xeon E-2176M is a high-end processor for professional laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture. The processor clocks at between 2.7 - 4.4 GHz (4.1 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. 

According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. The Xeon E-2176M is the second fastest model after the Xeon E-2178M / Core i9-8950HK in early 2018. Compared to the similar consumer Core i7-8850H, the mobile Xeon offers support for ECC main memory, is slightly higher clocked and offers more L3 cache.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to a similar clocked Kaby Lake processor.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is unchanged to the older Intel HD Graphics 630 an maybe only slightly higher clocked. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i9 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions.

Intel Core i5-8400H

► remove from comparison Intel i5-8400H

The Intel Core i5-8400H is a high-end processor for laptops with four cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and will be announced early 2018. The processor clocks at between 2.5 and 4.2 GHz (4.1 with 4 cores) and can execute up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

The Intel Core i5-8400H should perform similar as the older Core i7-7920HQ (3.1 - 4.1 GHz). The faster Coffee Lake CPUs, like the Core i7-8750H offers two additional cores and is therefore up to 50% faster in multithreaded benchmarks. Still, the performance of the i5-8400H should be sufficient for even demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz (rumored). The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i5 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

ModelIntel Xeon E-2176MIntel Core i5-8400H
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
CodenameCoffee Lake-HCoffee Lake-H
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
Intel Core i9-9980HK compare2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H compare2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H compare2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M « 2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H compare2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H compare2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H compare2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H compare3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK compare2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H compare2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H compare2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H compare2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H compare2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H compare2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H « 2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H compare3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Clock2700 - 4400 MHz2500 - 4200 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB1 MB
L3 Cache12 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 124 / 8
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
SocketFCBGA1440
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
4657 Points (4%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1128 Points (48%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
393 Points (44%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1793 Points (4%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 987     avg: 1067     median: 1095 (7%)     max: 1118 Points
min: 753     avg: 762     median: 761.5 (5%)     max: 770 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 169     avg: 181.7     median: 187 (56%)     max: 189 Points
min: 168     avg: 170.4     median: 170.4 (51%)     max: 172.8 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 9.32     avg: 11.3     median: 12.3 (16%)     max: 12.4 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 1.99     avg: 2.1     median: 2 (51%)     max: 2.12 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6928     avg: 7681     median: 6973 (42%)     max: 9142 Points
6659 Points (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 31923     avg: 35912     median: 32132 (23%)     max: 43681 Points
21711 Points (16%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 147     avg: 163.3     median: 163.3 (2%)     max: 179.6 s
230.8 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 4.909     avg: 5.3     median: 5.3 (1%)     max: 5.77 s
7.2 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 3947     avg: 4625     median: 4624.5 (7%)     max: 5302 Points
5391 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
22023 MIPS (13%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4553 MIPS (54%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 58.2     avg: 63.1     median: 63.1 (22%)     max: 67.9 fps
45.3 fps (16%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 195.8     avg: 203.6     median: 203.6 (47%)     max: 211.3 fps
185.2 fps (43%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
8.7 fps (15%)
6.5 fps (11%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.601     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (0%)     max: 0.756 GB/s
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 1     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (19%)     max: 1.2 GB/s
0.8 GB/s (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 6.1     avg: 6.9     median: 6.9 (18%)     max: 7.6 GB/s
4.6 GB/s (12%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
1151 Seconds (15%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 465.8     avg: 510     median: 509.9 (4%)     max: 554 Seconds
596 Seconds (4%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (15%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 7203     avg: 9007     median: 9757 (21%)     max: 10061 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.508     avg: 8.6     median: 8.6 (2%)     max: 8.69 s
9 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 18.78     avg: 19     median: 19 (1%)     max: 19.26 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 475.2     avg: 477     median: 477 (2%)     max: 478.8 s
498.3 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 38520     avg: 39431     median: 39431 (35%)     max: 40342 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 10234     avg: 11628     median: 11727 (32%)     max: 12923 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 30521     avg: 44313     median: 44313 (36%)     max: 58105 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 30553     avg: 43412     median: 43412 (35%)     max: 56271 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 59124     avg: 59647     median: 59646.5 (50%)     max: 60169 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 5617     avg: 8399     median: 9331 (24%)     max: 10250 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 11097     avg: 13737     median: 14418 (26%)     max: 15696 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 3916     avg: 4729     median: 4728.5 (20%)     max: 5541 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1493 Points (45%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
4963 Points (20%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1127 Points (48%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4352 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1118 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4211 Points (13%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 4077     avg: 4660     median: 4660 (47%)     max: 5243 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E-2176M +
min: 19388     avg: 20690     median: 20689.5 (23%)     max: 21991 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1048     avg: 1054     median: 1054 (1%)     max: 1060 ms
987 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 E-2176M +
76.2 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 35521     avg: 36102     median: 36101.5 (32%)     max: 36682 Points
49389 Points (44%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
155.3 Points (45%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
209 Points (44%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1127 Points (43%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 E-2176M +
88.9 Watt (16%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 E-2176M +
12.6 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon E-2176M → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8400H → 90% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 26. 00:46:16

#0 checking url part for id 9904 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9572 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.027s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9904 +0.003s ... 0.031s

#7 got single benchmarks 9904 +0.016s ... 0.047s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9572 +0.003s ... 0.05s

#9 got single benchmarks 9572 +0.009s ... 0.059s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.059s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.232s ... 0.291s

#12 return log +0.039s ... 0.33s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)